Preview

To What Extent Did Stalin’s Rule Mar the Key Turning Point in Russia’s Political Development 1856-1953?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1037 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
To What Extent Did Stalin’s Rule Mar the Key Turning Point in Russia’s Political Development 1856-1953?
To what extent did Stalin’s rule mar the key turning point in Russia’s political development 1856-1953?

In an historical context, a ‘turning point’ can be categorized as an event o impact caused by an individual that, had it not occurred, would have altered the final outcome of a period of history. In the period of Russian history 1856-1953 there is no doubt there was a huge amount on political change, at the bringing of the period Russia was a state ruled by an autocratic Tsar and by the end it had seen provisional governments, local and national assemblies and a whole variety of rulers, some more autocratic and reactionary than others. Stalin’s period of rule in Russia could be seen as the most brutal rule Russia saw in this period, but a lot of changes were made whilst he was in power. Historians’ opinions on Stalin are, as ever, wide ranging, Marxist historians tend to be of the opinion that the brutality was a means to an end which was a necessity. Martin McCauley believes that Stalin’s personal impact was not that great and that he was simply at the head of a machine that ran by itself with him as the public figurehead. There are many other events that may be turning points in this period including the reigns Tsars Alexander II, Alexander II and Nicholas II, the October Manifesto, Lenin’s actions in abolishing the Constituent Assembly and the overthrow of the Provisional Government. However one of the most key of these is the period 1916-1917 during which Russia lost its Tsar, gained a Provisional Government which was subsequently overthrown and replaced with Bolshevik rule under Lenin. A period of extreme political change which provided an overwhelming different style of government.

Following the abdication of Tsar Nicholas II and the rejection of the title by his brother Grand Duke Michael, Russian politics was thrown into turmoil with a system of Dual power, shared between the Provisional Government and the Soviets. This was essentially a struggle



Bibliography: • http://europeanhistory.about.com/od/famouspeople/p/prstalin.htm 31st November 2012 • www.Spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/FWWinRussia.htm 31st November 2012 • https://sites.google.com/site/ibhistoryrussia/syllabus-overview---imperial-russia/alexander-ii • ‘Years of Russia, the USST and the Collapse of Soviet Communism’ David Evans, Jane Jenkins • W.C Mosse ‘Alexander II (1855-81)’ • www.alexanderplace.org/palace/alexanderIIbio.html

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    All state leaders across the whole period held qualities that didn’t please the whole of the population in Russia. During the reign of Alex II, the government showed some strength with controlling opposition from the peasantry through the emancipation of the serfs in 1861. It was thought that to prevent revolt from below, this was a key movement that had to be made, and therefore prevented future unrest and opposition. However, the new liberated serfs had to deal with more laws concerning land ownership with led to further unrest and repression in the peasantry by the state. The state moreover, appeased the most vocal critics but in such a way that allowed dissenters to express themselves in the knowledge that Tsar’s decision would be final. Compared to Nicholas II’s reign, this showed a decisive leading technique, as Nicholas’s style was more conservative, and showed weakness, relying on others’ advice to fuel his decisions. A key failure throughout his period was the mixed rule attempt with the Duma introduced from 1906 to 1917, it is arguable that Nicholas II made concessions only to keep opposition temporarily at bay and that his aim was to uphold the principle of autocracy.…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How significant were the personalities of the contenders to succeed Lenin in accounting for Stalin’s defeat of his opponents in the years 1924-29…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Soviet Union DBQ

    • 840 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1924, the Soviet Union faced a power struggle when it’s leader and creator Vladimir Lenin died. His successor however, came into power and immediately began to make changes. This man knew exactly what he wanted to keep and more importantly what he wanted to change. His birth name was Iosif Vissarionovich Dzhugashvili, but who could possibly rule and leave a legacy with that name? He then adopted the name Joseph Stalin, (which means man of steel.) and began to rule the Soviet Union. At this time, the Soviet Union was well behind all the other countries; Stalin made many changes to the soviet society, employing many methods to achieve his aims.…

    • 840 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Josephe Stalin DBQ

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One of the most controversial leaders in world history was Joseph Stalin. He transformed the Soviet Union into a modern superpower between the years of 1928 and 1941. His ruling could be characterized as rapid industrialization, collectivized agriculture, great purges, and the extermination of opposition. Stalin’s rule could be proven both positively and negatively towards Russia. He powered the Russians military force but his methods negatively affected Russians.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Turning points are points where an important change occurs. It is very important that it will never be forgotten since these turning points make such great impact on history. Some of these impacts include food, people, plants, animals, technology, and diseases passed from one continent to the other. The voyages of Columbus and the Collapse of Communism in the Soviet Union are one of the most significant turning points that made political, social, and cultural impact.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The first of these was headed by a moderate liberal, Georgi Lvov and the second was ran by Alexander Krensky. The Provisional Government knew that the Bolsheviks were going to strike. The reports of the Bolshevik's conspiracy in where always in Krensky's mind, but there was overwhelming dissent about the revolution. The government was so unstable that Krensky had little to no control over the congress or military, and because Krensky did not have "the majesty of government, the laws, the protection of friends and of the state," he had no power, no control over his fortune. Krensky's failure as a prince had to do with the unstable government and the political factions all brewing their revolutions and civil unrest. He did not prepare for fortune. He met his end by not being able to deal with…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Soviet Russia and the United States were so called ‘’allies’’ however due to the difference and hatred of one another’s governing systems the cold war began to evolve. Both countries knew that getting…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dziewanowski, M. K. (2003). Russia in the twentieth century (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.…

    • 1696 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In global history, many civilizations have undergone changes that historians consider turning points. A turning point is a point in time at which a significant change occurs that affects a whole society's way of life. There are many examples of turning points in the past.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aglaya's Response To Stalin

    • 2546 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Or how the reaction to Stalin by three social groups illustrates the development of Socialism in the Soviet Union from 1945 to the 1990s.…

    • 2546 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A historical turning point is a significant event in history that has led to lasting change. Many historical turning points have taken place in history; some minor, and others life changing. Some examples of turning points in history include the Emancipation Proclamation, and the Trail of Tears. Both of these events resulted in major outcomes that can be considered both positive and negative.…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    To what extent did war act as a catalyst for change in Russia between 1855 and 1924…

    • 1389 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Though such victory strengthened Russia's international political role, at home the people faced an inefficient government and economic turmoil. When Nicholas I (1825-1855) succeeded his older brother Alexander I in 1825, he faced a public grieved by the peasants' hardship and influenced by the neighboring French Revolution. The result came as an uprising, with a group of liberal western-minded nobles and army officers engaging in the Decembrist Revolt of 1825. Tsar Nicholas I crushed the rebellion, and in the aftermath he became increasingly authoritarian--sending police to detect revolutionaries, abandoning Peter the Great's established Westernization Program and rigorously censoring written materials.…

    • 2263 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A historical turning point is a significant event in history that has led to a lasting change. One example of a well-known turning point is the Scientific Revolution. The Scientific Revolution was a time period of rapid advances in European scientific, mathematical, and political thought. This period led people to begin to question what they knew about the world around them.…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Although the Romanov Regime had always been very unpopular with the Russian people over many years, the regime had always managed to survive until 1917. In order to discover why the regime fell so quickly, it is necessary to look at the number of different factors which led the Tsarist regime to fall in March 1917. Tsar Nicholas II 's regime was autocratic, which means that the rule of the country is placed on the ruling of one person in this case, Nicholas II. There were a broad number of factors that led to the downfall of the Tsarist regime, and these can be placed in long and short term factors.…

    • 1756 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays