Preview

To What Extent Does The Alien Act Violate The Constitution

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
520 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
To What Extent Does The Alien Act Violate The Constitution
The Federal government is trying to take away our rights and our constitution. They are to believe that the president shall be allowed to make any “alien” leave the united states at any time he thinks is necessary. The historical question is “does the alien act violate the constitution and should it be legal?” People may say the act does not go against the constitution and it should be legal because the federal government has a job to protect and has the right and duty to defend against the war. The alien act does go against the U.S constitution and should not be legal.

If the government were to enforce the alien act then we would be going against the constitution and would have no freedom of speech or the press. It was stated “Also, the first amendment says that the congress should not make laws limiting,”the freedom of speech or the press.” This means that harmful lies and defamation are not under the power of the federal court.” This quote states that with the freedom of speech and press that the government can not deal with any mentally harmful or offensive comments or writings that the people have to say. If the alien act was enforced then we would have our freedom of speech or press taken from us. Since we do not have the alien act with us then we have the privilege of freedom of speech and press.
…show more content…
It was stated “ if we accept these acts we will surrender the form of government we have chosen. We will live under a government that gets it owns power from its own will, and not from our authority.” This quote states that if we allowed the alien act to the part taken in we would be giving the government unlimited power and have no one to control them. The alien act should not be allowed because if it’s enforced then we will live under a government who has no authority to tell them when too much power is too

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Alien Acts Dbq Analysis

    • 239 Words
    • 1 Page

    President Adams’s response to the French foreign threat was to pass a series of laws that included the repression of domestic protest. The four bills are known as the Alien and Sedition Acts that were collectively passed by the Federalist Congress and President Adams in 1789. There were three Alien Acts. The first, being the Alien Enemies Law, which granted the president extraordinary wartime powers. The president was able to detain or deport citizens of the nations that the United States were at war with. Also those who the president thought were acting in a suspicious manner. This legislation never went into effect because President Adams never declared a war. The second act, the Alien law, gave power to the president to banish any foreigners…

    • 239 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bethel V Fraser

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This is the major question that arises. I believe that everyone knows that speech is protected under the…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hudgens V Labar Case Study

    • 2468 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Our constitution gives us the right under the First Amendment to the Freedom of Speech. This seems like a fairly straight forward right, but what many don’t know is that the Constitution only guarantees our right to freedom of speech against abridgement by government, federal or state. (Hudgens v. National Labor Relations Board, 424 U.S. 507 Lexis).…

    • 2468 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe the reasons why Congress passed this law was in order to protect our country is a few reasons. Due to the September 11th attack on America the Bush Administration basically bullied Congress to approve the law that they had previously rejected. The Bush Administration basically threatened members that if they voted against the bill that they would personally be blamed if there were any more attacks on America. This brought forth the way in which the bill was passed, members barely had time in which to read the bill in order to make a logical…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This law allows the president to send the military into action against anyone deemed a terrorist, essentially making it a “blank check” justifying any military action. The Founders would be astonished by this act, as it gives the President almost unlimited authority to use the military. They expected Congress to rein in the President on military matters, as the Constitution only authorized military appropriations for two year periods which was intended to keep the President from permanently supporting an army.2I also believe the Founders would disapprove of the idea of the “legislating president.” While executive orders have been issued by almost every President, they have always been criticized as increasingly violating Congress’ power to make the laws. The line between making laws and enforcing them has been blurred as presidents choose to enforce laws differently. While the presidency was given several specific powers, the Take Care clause has been interpreted to mean that the President may enforce laws however he sees fit, greatly expanding presidential…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The First Amendment protection for freedom of expression “consists of the rights to freedom of speech, press, assembly, petition the government for a redress of grievances, and the implied rights of association and belief” (www.law.cornell.edu). Though there are several components of freedom of expression “the most basic component of freedom of expression is the right of freedom of speech” (www.law.cornell.edu). The First Amendment states that the “right to freedom of speech allows individuals to express themselves without interference or constraint by the government”…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the First Amendment granted freedom of speech and assembly, as well as the freedom to hold private meetings, Americans should have had the right to express personal ideas without fear of government searches, regardless of the medium in which the communication took…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Document H says "… the power to acquire territory by treaty implies not only the power to govern such territory, but to prescribe upon what terms the United States will receive its' inhabitants…" By using treaties, the U.S Government was annexing new lands and gaining "territories". However, the government, at the same time, was denying the inhabitants of the new land the right to U.S citizenship. The U.S government was interested only in the land gained by these annexations and not the people living on the land. Document E shows the second idea, the idea of power, the U.S politicians held over the newly annexed lands. "… The power that rules the Pacific… is the power that rules the world. And…that power is and will forever be the American Republic." Politicians saw that by annexing lands such as the Philippians, Hawaii, Dominican Republic, Haiti and Cuba, a nation we now do not control, the government was fulfilling the idea that America was destined to be a "world…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Federalist authorities and their supporters claimed that the laws were motivated by the need to protect the nation against destabilizing foreign factors in such a revolutionary era (Neuman 54). However, the Republican opposition thought that the true reason was domestic politics. At the time, the split of politics to the federalist and democratic sides made the government uncomfortable, especially considering that immigrants were also political. The Naturalization Act for instance was therefore meant to deal with French and Irish immigrants who tended to engage themselves a lot in republican political activity (Neuman 53). The other alien acts were also supposed to intimidate foreign critics and the Sedition Act to suppress the media and therefore protect the federalist…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Patriot Act Pros And Cons

    • 3614 Words
    • 15 Pages

    On October 26th, 2001, just 45 days after September 11th a panicked Congress passed, with little debate, the USA Patriot Act. The 342 page patriot act violates our 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th, 8th and 14th amendments, thus making it unconstitutional. I don't know why Congress passed this act, or how it got through the Supreme Court, but most people in Congress didn't even read the Patriot Act. I am sure that our founding fathers would not have wanted the Patriot Act. Just look at what Ben Franklin said, "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."…

    • 3614 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    They have the rights to not say anything and to not self-incriminate. b. As a result of this, Americans have the right to remain silent, the right to not testify against yourself, and the right for an attorney. 2. Fruit of a poisonous tree.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Alien Act raised the residency requirement for citizens from five to fourteen years, gave the president the authority to deport individuals whom he considered a threat to the United States, and provided for the deportation or imprisonment of any individual in time of declared war. The Sedition Act stated that speaking, writing, or publishing criticism of the government were at the very least misdemeanors and possibly treasonous. The federalists saw foreigners as a threat to security during the Quasi Naval War. “The man who...shall be the apologist of France, and (who attacks) his own government, is not an American. The choice for him lies between being deemed a fool, a madman, or a traitor,” (ALEXANDER FUCKING HAMILTON MOTHERFUCKER (on a side note i do not agree with his statement but i still think his musical fucking…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    People would consider the Alien and Sedition Acts unconstitutional because they did not followed they freedom established in the Bill of Rights. According to the Constitution, the President had no authority to imprison or deport aliens he considered dangerous for the nation’s security, because the power is shared between the state government and the national government. The Bill of Rights allows people to have their right to speech and the President couldn’t prison people who doesn’t agree with his laws, publish scandalous or malicious writings against him. All criminal prosecutions have the right to speedy and public trial. Any person can’t be discriminated by their religion or be prohibited of practicing it, just like aliens can’t be considerate…

    • 140 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This act also allowed the government to deport immigrants. Furthermore, the “sedition” part of the Alien and Sedition acts prevented people, including citizens, from speaking out against the…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Japanese Internment

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Although the reasoning of the President and the federal government may seem valid, many civil and constitutional rights were violated with Executive Order 9066. Habeas corpus was a right given to…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays