Preview

To What Extent Is the House of Commons Effective in Carrying Out Its Various Functions?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
787 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
To What Extent Is the House of Commons Effective in Carrying Out Its Various Functions?
To What Extent is the House of Commons Effective in Carrying out Its Various Functions? The mechanisms placed in the House of Commons to ensure its effectiveness are vital to the democracy and overall quality of governing within the UK. Whilst government domination proves to be the key hindrance affecting the quality of the Commons’ work, the checks and balances and opportunities to scrutinise produce an effective chamber in regards to the most important of its functions. The primary function of the House of Commons is being a law-making body and the majority government in the House of Commons can be argued as having improved the speed with which bills can be passed by the chamber, especially in relation to states of emergency such as the Anti-Terrorism Laws in 2007. However, it comes with the tendency to pass legislature that hasn’t been fairly scrutinised and to not consider bills that have been proposed by MPs outside of government, overlooking needed legislation simply because it hasn’t originated from the executive, with only 72 Private Member’s Bills being passed under the Labour government from 1997 to 2010. The executive’s domination of seats also means government-sponsored bills can be quickly and assuredly passed in the first chamber, lessening their quality as there is less debate. On the other hand, the House of Commons has defeated government control on various occasions, one example being on the 29 April 2009, in which a Liberal Democrat motion that all Ghurkhas be offered an equal right of residence was passed, in opposition to Labour policy. This shows a degree of efficiency within the non-executive areas of the Commons, particularly over controversial and publicised issues. Also, the recent coalition government, with a relatively small majority of 77 seats, has found it more difficult to logistically dominate votes and is therefore forced to provide sufficient scrutiny and amendment. These examples of the Common’s independence from
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Discuss To The Extent Which Party Contr
    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Discuss To The Extent Which Party Contr

    In the House of Commons there are many parties all fighting individually for control of the house, and to be in power and govern the land of the UK. To win the election and do this a party or coalition of parties needs a 326 majority to be able to form a government. This system creates a dominance in the house of commons if that majority is achieved sufficiently, as with Tony Blair’s landslide in 1997 where he had over a 150 seat majority, it is this kind of one party dominance I am going to be discussing in this essay and whether or not it limits parliaments main function to represent constituents and pass laws which benefit them.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How are effective are Backbench MPs?
    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages

    How are effective are Backbench MPs?

    One of the main functions of backbench MPs is scrutinize the government and hold them to account via different ways, and it is this function which proves them to be highly effective. Their role in Parliament ensures and strengthens the democratic legitimacy of the executive, thus giving government the authority and right to exercise political power. Another key role of backbench MPs is to act as cross-section of the larger society and therefore represent their interests in Parliament. However, the increase of power held by the government further supports the Burkean view that an “elective dictatorship” has formed considerably in the UK political system. In addition to this, many people have argued that backbench MPs have limited power in actually calling the government to account due to the party system, which ensures that MPs are dictated by ministers and party whips – who use persuasive methods (the promise of promotions or the threat of expulsion/demotion) reduce the effectiveness within the political system. There are both arguments for and against the effectiveness of backbench MPs, however it is debatable as to which outweighs the other.…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    To what extent do MPs fulfil their role of holding the government to account?
    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To what extent do MPs fulfil their role of holding the government to account?

    There are different ways that MPs hold the government to account; there are debates, select committees and questions, however there are many reasons in which these methods can be seen as ineffective. Accountability is forcing the government and it’s ministers to justify their policies, for opposition parties’ accountability may imply alternatives to the proposals of the government.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    To what extent has the formation of a coalition altered the relationship between Parliament and government?
    • 787 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To what extent has the formation of a coalition altered the relationship between Parliament and government?

    The first sign that the Coalition has changed the relationship between the Executive and the Legislature would be the rising effectiveness and opportunity of scrutiny. Parliament’s role of scrutinizing the government has become extensive with the lack of majority in the House of Commons. With a majority in the government, MPs would usually support the governing party and there was less elbowroom for criticism. Parliamentary scrutiny has become most effective through Prime Minister’s question time, where the Parliament have a chance to hold the executive accountable every Wednesday, and The Wrights Reforms, brought about in 2010. This has made it harder for the government to pass legislation, as they can no longer use the select committees to ease the passage of legislation. The Wrights reforms changed the appointment of chairs of departmental and select committees to being elected by MPs rather than appointed by the Prime Minister. This has freed the select committees from the control of the whips and manipulation by the government. An example of the effectiveness would be when Theresa May faced difficult…

    • 787 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    John Ibbitson Argument Summary
    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    John Ibbitson Argument Summary

    In his thinking – which is entirely true – the role of the senate is an advisory role to the government and checking the laws that are passed by the House of Commons. However, for the purposes of democracy, he sites that even if the members of the senate are appointed as independent candidates, the selection process ought to be on the basis of merit and ought to follow the due process. I am in support of the arguments presented by this author because he looks at the public good. At times the House of Commons might pass laws while looking at their immediate self-interest, however, an experienced senate remains as one of the bodies to bring justice…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Uk Parliament Is Increasingly Dominated by the Executive
    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Uk Parliament Is Increasingly Dominated by the Executive

    The word parliament derives from a word loosely translated as ‘to talk’ or ‘to deliberate’. The UK Parliament consists officially of the two Houses of Parliament: the Lords and the Commons and the monarch, which by convention, delegates his or her authority to a group of ministers known as the executive. The role of parliament is mainly to legislate and to govern the United Kingdom through elected representatives. However the executive has a special role over the legislatures and it has been argued that the UK Parliament has become increasingly dominated by the executive.…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How effective are backbench MPs?
    • 630 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How effective are backbench MPs?

    Backbench MPs are critical for UK democracy. They allow for high standard scrutiny of the government which holds them accountable for their actions to the people. They help in representing the electorate. However there are some circumstances in which backbench MPs have little control, for example an elective dictatorship or because of the UK party system which is enforced by party whips.…

    • 630 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Discuss the View That the Uk Parliament Is No Longer Sovereign.
    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Discuss the View That the Uk Parliament Is No Longer Sovereign.

    Before evaluating whether or not Parliament is sovereign, it’s important to define what sovereignty means. Sovereignty can be split into two; political and legal. Legal sovereignty is the ultimate power to make laws which will be enforced within the state. Members of Parliament and the Prime Minister have ultimate legal power because they propose and enforce legislation. Citizens have no legal sovereignty because they don’t play a role in the legislative function even though pressure group activity may influence decisions. Political sovereignty is where real political power lies, and depending on the situation political sovereignty doesn’t always lie within Parliament. Critics have argued that due to recent changes, Parliament is no longer truly sovereign. This essay will assess the arguments for and against.…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Explain 3 ways in which parliament has lost sovereignty
    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Explain 3 ways in which parliament has lost sovereignty

    Second way is that a lot of acts which are created in Westminster Parliament are passed because of government members majority and therefore coalition government members which also vote in parliament have the majority sits in parliament and therefore can affect acts and laws which can be passed. So parliament has lost sovereignty because government can affect parliament and they are not separate (like in USA where they have Congress and government and they are not bind together in any way) whereas in our system government is bind with parliament. A good example of coalition government affecting act passing in parliament are 37 acts, which has been passed because of majority of government members in parliament.…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    “Constitutional Reform Since 1997 Has Not Gone Far Enough” Discuss
    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Constitutional Reform Since 1997 Has Not Gone Far Enough” Discuss

    In 1999 Labour reformed the House of Lords; Labour removed 600 hereditary peers and reduced it to only 92 hereditary Lords in the House of Lords. However, the labor government did propose a system of “elected peers”, where the public could choose peers to sit in the House of Lords. This proposal was never fully implemented into the UK constitution. Until this proposal is full entrenched it is argued that the Lords are not democratically legitimate as all policy making institutions must have legitimacy. Therefore, there is much that can be done towards constitutional reform.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    To what extent has the location of sovereignty changed in recent years
    • 1577 Words
    • 5 Pages

    To what extent has the location of sovereignty changed in recent years

    One factor which can be argued to of had the biggest effect in terms of changing where parliamentary sovereignty resides in recent years is the EU. The UK initially joined the EC in 1973 since then the EC has become the EU and has also become increasingly more powerful over the UK as time has passed, the EU could even be argued to be supreme over UK statues and the UK parliament. This is shown in the factortame case in which EU law took precedent over UK wishes, allowing Spanish fishing boats to fish in UK waters, this was the first time UK law was scrutinized and removed by courts due to EU law contradicting these laws. Furthermore, being part of the EU ultimately is a way of binding the UK governments successors partly due to the fact that if the UK left the EU there could be major…

    • 1577 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    How Does Parliament Lack Democratic Accountability
    • 2004 Words
    • 9 Pages

    How Does Parliament Lack Democratic Accountability

    There is an element of truth in the given statement and this essay will seek to explain UK’s Parliament today does, to a certain degree, lack democratic accountability, and this can be shown in dominance of the (i) Executive, (ii) Unrepresentative, and its (iii) Detachment from citizens.…

    • 2004 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Role Of Parliament In Canada's Democracy
    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Role Of Parliament In Canada's Democracy

    The House of Commons is made up of 338 members of Parliament that represent different constituencies which vote in Canada’s federal elections (Courtney, 2015). More importantly, the electoral system in which members of parliament are elected is called first past the post system and the candidate with the most votes wins the elections with plurality voting (Cross, 2010, p. 130). On the other hand, the second chamber of Canada’s Parliament is the Senate. The Senate is regarded as the chamber of “sober second thought” as the Senate reviews legislation from a less partisan perspective while representing Canada’s regions (Letwin, 2016). However, based on constitutional convention, the elected House of Commons is the dominant chamber in Parliament with the Senate rarely opposing the elected legislators’ will (Letwin, 2016). In terms of governance, the concept of responsible government makes the executive branch of government accountable to Parliament (Sharman, 2008, p. 8). Thus, the role of both chambers of Parliament becomes evident as they make up the legislative branch of government which under the concept of parliamentary supremacy is supreme over the other branches of government such as the executive and judicial branches of government (Sharman, 2008, p. 4). It is, therefore, necessary to examine the issues within both chambers…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Parliament as a Law Maker
    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Parliament as a Law Maker

    Parliament is the supreme law making body consisting of all elected members of both houses. Its main role is to make laws, laws that not only protect society and individual rights but reflect the societies values. Parliament can be viewed as an arena for debate where new ideas for laws and proposed laws are discussed and debated on their purpose for an effective law to be delivered. Thus lessening the chance of an unjust law being created. However, parliament is not always effective when making laws as many factors can hinder the process of legislation within the two houses. However there are multiple strengths that far outweigh the weaknesses when determining parliament’s effectiveness.…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Canadian Party Discipline
    • 3485 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Canadian Party Discipline

    Mahler, Gregory. “Congress and the House of Commons: Legislative Behavior and Legislative Roles in Two Democracies.” Ed. C. Soe. Annual Editions; Comparative Politics, 02/03. 20th edition. Guilford, CN: McGraw-Hill, 2002: 74–78…

    • 3485 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics