Preview

To What Extent Is The House Of Commons Effective In Carrying Out Its Various Functions

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1905 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
To What Extent Is The House Of Commons Effective In Carrying Out Its Various Functions
To what extent is the House of Commons effective in carrying out its various functions?

The House of Commons is the publicly elected chamber of parliament, it is made up of 659 MP’s, all of whom are elected within a constituency throughout the UK. With the rare exception, such as Martin Bell in 1997, almost all MP’s are elected from a political party. Members in the House of Commons debate the major political issues of the day and make proposals for new laws. The House of Commons holds legislative functions, and is also used to hold the executive to account. It could be argued that the House of Commons is very effective in carrying out it’s functions due to the introduction, and then reform, of the select committees, the regular questioning of ministers, the fact that they have, although it is a rarity, voted against parliament and the growth in use of social media has helped MP’s to become more in contact with their constituencies. Others may claim that the House of Commons is not effective as there is only limited power to challenge the prerogative powers exercised by the Prime Minister and other government ministers, the fusion of the executive and legislative branch combined with the extensive use of party whips makes it difficult for the backbenchers to challenge the government.

Select committees were introduced in 1979 and have hugely increased the effectives of the House of Commons in both its legislative function, forcing them to amend law on occasion, and also by holding the executive to account. There are currently 40 select committees ranging from things such as the Communities and Local Government Committee to the Science and Technology Committee, examining the spending, policies and administration of each government department. Select Committees can choose the subject of their investigations, and who and when to interview allowing them to scrutinize them very effectively. Since 2002, the Prime minister has appeared twice a year in front of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. What does Parliament consist of and how are the members selected in each house?…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    TMA 1 W200

    • 1435 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The most important source of English Law is Legislation; it is implemented by the queen in Parliament I.e. the House of Commons, the House of lord and the Monarch. As part of the UK elections, citizens permitted to vote will elect an association to represent the House of Commons. On the other hand the House of Lords are not elected members and do not represent. At present majority of the Lords are selected by the Monarch on the advice of the Prime Minister; however the House of Lords Appointments Commission assists with the vetting nominations.…

    • 1435 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The house of lords is the upper chamber of the Uk’s bicameral parliament, Beginning in the the 11th century. The house of lords’ role in government is to work with the house of commons to; make laws, check and challenge the actions of government ( the house of lords has no veto power) and provide independent competence. Firstly, in 1999 the Labour party under Tony Blair as Prime Minister reformed the house of lords. For centuries the house of lords consisted of members that inherited their seats, the Act removed such right. The act reduced members of the house of lords from 1,330 members to 669 members and a proportion of the members that are ‘cross benchers’ members with no party affiliation. In order for this act to receive supported votes, Tony Blair and the labour party passed the Weatherill Amendment that put in place a deal that allowed 92 of the 669 members to remain heredity. The reforms in houses of lords progressive towards democracy due to the fact that Historically, members of the House of Lords have been the richest and most important landowners in the country, who would pass their peerages down through their family, which creates bias towards the wealthy. By…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the House of Commons there are many parties all fighting individually for control of the house, and to be in power and govern the land of the UK. To win the election and do this a party or coalition of parties needs a 326 majority to be able to form a government. This system creates a dominance in the house of commons if that majority is achieved sufficiently, as with Tony Blair’s landslide in 1997 where he had over a 150 seat majority, it is this kind of one party dominance I am going to be discussing in this essay and whether or not it limits parliaments main function to represent constituents and pass laws which benefit them.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It can be argued that Backbench MPs are effective due to their role working on Select Committees. Whilst working on Select Committees, backbenchers check and report on areas ranging from the work of government departments to economic affairs. This over-seeing and examination of executive work provides effective and detailed scrutiny. The scrutinizing of the government ensures its democratic legitimacy and therefore gives it the authority and right to exercise political power . Through Select Committees, backbench MPs have proven to be effective because their close examination of the execute has led to action being taken. An example of this is George Osborne’s 2012 Budget which propose a “Pasty-Tax” on UK hot, baked goods. Following intense scrutiny from the Treasury Select Committee,…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The select committees have a very effective role as they have the power to question and cross examine ministers, their civil servants and any witnesses they may want to call from any external organisations. MPs gain a lot of knowledge and expertise while being in the select committees, which can be a very good thing as they are able to wisely question and analyse the policies that are being debated. They are able to request access to government papers, so they are able to increase their knowledge on the specific issue.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The word parliament derives from a word loosely translated as ‘to talk’ or ‘to deliberate’. The UK Parliament consists officially of the two Houses of Parliament: the Lords and the Commons and the monarch, which by convention, delegates his or her authority to a group of ministers known as the executive. The role of parliament is mainly to legislate and to govern the United Kingdom through elected representatives. However the executive has a special role over the legislatures and it has been argued that the UK Parliament has become increasingly dominated by the executive.…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although not mentioned in the Constitution Congressional committees have become an essential tool in Congress as its membership has increased and an expansion in government involvement in economic and social life has required a far greater volume of legislation and increased scrutiny of the executive. Select committees are permanent and therefore members of a committee who are re-elected gain a large amount of expertise in the policy area the committee deals with and a large amount of skill in executive scrutiny. The main functions of committees are the scrutiny of legislation in their field of speciality (N.B. this involves the power to stop a bill), the scrutiny of executive departments and basic 'housekeeping' and co-ordination roles. Congressional committees are powerful, well-funded, well-staffed (large numbers of researchers) and respected as important bodies. For this reason members want to serve; also they may advance in the party through good committee service and also through committee membership have a more powerful influence on the legislative process and may gain a degree of control over legislation of particular importance to their…

    • 1740 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The pass bills, they debate and changes laws but to what extent is it effective.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There is an element of truth in the given statement and this essay will seek to explain UK’s Parliament today does, to a certain degree, lack democratic accountability, and this can be shown in dominance of the (i) Executive, (ii) Unrepresentative, and its (iii) Detachment from citizens.…

    • 2004 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ww1 and Ww2

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Congress and Parliament both have a bicameral legislature or a two-house legislature. Parliament’s two houses are the Lords and the House of Commons. Members of the House of Commons are publically elected by the people of England. Currently, the House of Commons has 1,100 members. Their primary responsibility is to propose new laws, yet they also deal with financial bills such as creating a new dollar. The Lords are mostly appointed representatives chosen by Parliament. They currently have 830 members. Their responsibilities are too make laws, investigate policy issues, and often compliment the works of the House of Commons. Similarly, Congress’ houses are the Senate and the House of Representatives. These parties are both voted in by constituents or people of the United States. The Senate is often known as the “upper” house of congress while the House of Representatives is often known as the “lower” house. Both houses of Congress can propose new laws and vote on them. The overall main difference is that the Senate controls all of the Presidents meetings and appointments, and they can decide the future of a bill. The Senate is home to 100 members of Congress, while the House of Representatives is home to 435 members of Congress.…

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    They decide who shall be recognized to speak on the floor of the House, rules weather a motion is relevant and relevant to the business at hand, and decide the committees to which new bills shall be assigned…

    • 4804 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The House of Commons is made up of 338 members of Parliament that represent different constituencies which vote in Canada’s federal elections (Courtney, 2015). More importantly, the electoral system in which members of parliament are elected is called first past the post system and the candidate with the most votes wins the elections with plurality voting (Cross, 2010, p. 130). On the other hand, the second chamber of Canada’s Parliament is the Senate. The Senate is regarded as the chamber of “sober second thought” as the Senate reviews legislation from a less partisan perspective while representing Canada’s regions (Letwin, 2016). However, based on constitutional convention, the elected House of Commons is the dominant chamber in Parliament with the Senate rarely opposing the elected legislators’ will (Letwin, 2016). In terms of governance, the concept of responsible government makes the executive branch of government accountable to Parliament (Sharman, 2008, p. 8). Thus, the role of both chambers of Parliament becomes evident as they make up the legislative branch of government which under the concept of parliamentary supremacy is supreme over the other branches of government such as the executive and judicial branches of government (Sharman, 2008, p. 4). It is, therefore, necessary to examine the issues within both chambers…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Canadian Party Discipline

    • 3485 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Mahler, Gregory. “Congress and the House of Commons: Legislative Behavior and Legislative Roles in Two Democracies.” Ed. C. Soe. Annual Editions; Comparative Politics, 02/03. 20th edition. Guilford, CN: McGraw-Hill, 2002: 74–78…

    • 3485 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Uk Political System

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Parliament checks the work of the government on behalf of UK citizens through investigative select committees and by asking government ministers questions. The House of Commons also has to approve proposals for government taxes and spending.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays