Preview

To What Extent Was Pitt's Repressive Policy the Main Reason for His Success in Resisting the Radical Challenge to 1801?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
936 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
To What Extent Was Pitt's Repressive Policy the Main Reason for His Success in Resisting the Radical Challenge to 1801?
To what extent was Pitt’s repressive policy the main reason for his success in resisting the radical challenge to 1801?

The growing threat of revolution by English radicals being influenced by Irish rebels and the French Revolution was the main thing William Pitt the younger was faced with during his time as Prime Minister. To deal with this, he reinforced a repressive policy of tough legislation strengthened through propaganda.It was not only these actions taken that managed to quell the revolutionaries from revolting. Other than the actions taken by Pitt, there was discordance between the radicals,also the loyalist reaction sparked by the war in France; these are only a few reasons amongst many. It was the contribution of factors that chastened the movement, not just a singular factor.

The chance of revolution was reduced by the repressive policies put in place by Pitt as it subdued the radicals, as he adopted and introduced laws to extinguish the growth and spread of radical ideas. Habeas corpus (a legal action, through which a prisoner can be released from unlawful detention)was suspended by Pitt, allowing people to be imprisoned without trial for as long as it is wished. The suspension of Habeas corpus gave Pitt the right to have suspected radicals imprisoned to prevent them spreading their ideas or taking action. Another law that came into action during Pitts time in office was the 1793 Aliens Act, which prevented foreigners from entering the United Kingdom without permission, this was a precaution taken to stop the influx of French revolutionaries entering the country bringing with them radical ideas. The 1795 Public Meetings Act made meetings of more than 50 people illegal, this was a measure also to prevent radicals meeting and spreading their ideas. All these measures were introduced to dampen the spread and popularity of the radical movement, these policies however were not the only ones that help do this.

Pitt went to war with France in 1793,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Chem Lab.

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages

    3. Determine the mass of the clean dry vial and record your mass to 2 decimal places on your lab sheet.…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To add to this, the suspension of Habeas Corpus in 1817 meant that radicals could be charged without trial, and this successfully led to the radical voice being silenced. The radicals couldn’t complain because the government would simply arrest…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The third law, claimed that any royal official accused of a capital crime would be tried in Britain. This law in essence meant that any crime committed in the colonies by a royal official, would have less punishment when it was tried in a sympathetic England, if there was a trial at all. Lastly, the fourth law allowed military commanders to lodge soldiers wherever necessary, including private homes. This law did not sit well with the colonist and would eventually lead to the third amendment in the Bill of Rights, which stated that no soldier would be quartered in a private home during times of peace. Parliament and the Prime Minister felt justified in these actions after an attempt to help colonist by lowering British tea prices. After the blatant disregard for British authority, Parliament needed to reassert their dominance over the colonies. The acts were opposed in the colonies due to their invasive nature. The Coercive Acts hurt business, corrupted the justice system, and forced colonist to…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In March 1784 the British General Election consolidated William Pitt’s power in many different ways.…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The French revolution broke out in 1789, and while at first Britain was pleased and welcomed the changes that the revolution brought to France (i.e. the new constitutional monarchy mirrored Britain's political system in many ways.) Pitt and his government began to become worried when the revolution in France stepped up a gear and became more extreme, they obviously didn't want a repeat of the French experience in Britain. The outcome of the revolution was inevitable and in 1792 when France became a republic, it was also the start of a period of time (1793-1794) that became known as 'revolutionary terror'. Revolutionary terror is essentially force used or implemented against people or groups who are counter-revolutionary. This caused a great fear of revolution in Britain and contributed to Britain going to war with France In January 1793 after the execution of Louis XVI. This led to a fear of French invasion of Britain throughout the country and worried Pitt and his government greatly from 1793-1801. This fear was not unfounded as France tried to invade Britain twice, firstly, in 1797 a small group of French soldiers landed in the small welsh village of Fishguard . Even though this small band of troops were easily captured and dealt with, it still began to plant a very real threat of invasion into Britain's soils. In 1798, a larger French military force landed in Ireland and successfully assisted the Irish Rebels, which again showed and proved that the threat of invasion to Britain was now significant and there were now also British worried that France would begin to use Ireland as a 'stepping-stone' to invade Britain. After Pitt declared War on France in 1793, he had hoped to fight a traditional colonial war, but due to the state of the army, he had to focus Britain's army on the naval war and pay others to fight the colonial war for him. He paid for this by introducing income tax.…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pitt recognized this and made it his first priority to raise national revenue and increase the confidence of the people. Several of Pitt’s reforms were extremely successful due to this deep understanding Pitt had, and he managed to base many of his reforms on it. Pitt successfully passed the “Commutation Act” in 1784 which reduced the duty on tea, wines, spirits and other general products. This discouraged much of the smuggling which was taking place in and out of Britain, for there was less of an incentive to smuggle with such low taxation. Pitt managed to reduce smuggling a great deal with the Commutation Act and also by extending rights of search over suspect cargoes. By 1790 the yield to the government on wines had increased by 29 per cent, on spirits by 63 per cent and on tobacco by 39 percent. By tactically destroying the profitability of smuggling, Pitt ensured a general increase in the wealth and prosperity of the country, 47 percent higher than 1783, of which the Exchequer received a surplus £1.7 million. This financial reform proved extremely successful, and owed much of its success to Pitt’s knowledge of how Britain was being run and…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Tudor governments were relatively successful in dealing with the problem of rebellion, although this was more effective towards the end of the period than at the beginning shown through the decline in rebellion after 1549: only 5 English rebellions occurred as opposed to 10 before 1549. Over the course of the Tudor period the main aims of rebellions were only fully achieved in the rebellions of 1525, the Amicable Grant and 1553. In addition to this the reforms made to local government, policies directly implemented by central government and the effects of trials and retribution, such as Henry VII’s concessions made to the late 15th century pretenders, Lambert Simnell and Perkin Warbeck and later in the period during Elizabeth’s reign, who recognised rebel Shane O’Neil as Earl of Tyrone, all contributed to the reduction in the frequency and scale of English rebellions. Pre-emptive strikes implemented by Tudor governments were also instrumental, especially during the start of the period in Henry’s reign and later in Elizabeth’s reign, in preventing rebellion or stopping riots from becoming dangerous rebellions. In some areas these strategies and tactics worked better in some areas than others; Irish rebellions were generally more costly and more difficult to suppress.…

    • 2557 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    To What Extent Was Pitt’s Repressive Policy The Main Reason For His Success In Resisting The Radical Challenge Of 1801?…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    a beginning push to the movement of the revolution. England eventually found a new power…

    • 548 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dr bob

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages

    (b) To what extent were the policies of the Younger Pitt the most significant influence on…

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The period of 1830-1931 saw gradual yet largely significant governmental reforms which led to an extension of the franchise from 500,000 to around 21 million. Prior to 1832, Britain’s franchise composed of a selective elite of the landowning class, however the 1832 reform act, although a disappointment in the extent of what it achieved, paved the way for further reform as it brought people together in rebellion (the Bristol Riots). This proved that popular pressure had the potential to be very successful in orchestrating parliamentary reform. The influence of pressure from outside parliament was certainly a major vehicle for generating improved representation and greater democracy in Britain, particularly due to the legacy of the French Revolution which caused concern in the government who were worried that it would give impetus to the British to remove power from the aristocracy and monarchy. However other factors also played a significant role in stimulating change such as the work of individuals and rivalry between the political parties themselves.…

    • 2685 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The first key point to look at is the nature of British society at the time. The economy and living conditions can always be catalysts for a revolution- an example is the sorry state of the French economy, one of the major causes of revolution breaking out there, just before they went into revolution. Now, had the economy of Britain in the 1790’s been as crippled as France’s was, then it would have been likely that people in Great Britain would have been feeling desperate for change, and a revolutionary would have been looking likely. However, this was not the case. Although the years 1795 and 1797 were very difficult in terms of high bread prices and unemployment, the situation was simply not severe enough to make revolution a necessity for people in Great Britain. Hunger and famine were very sparse, in comparison to France. In fact, the standard of living of most people in the 1790’s had actually improved due to the industrial revolution taking place at the time. Pitt, thanks to his numerous reforms and changes to the government, such as increasing taxes and the introduction of the sinking fund, meant that the threat of revolution was significantly decreased.…

    • 2322 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    To begin with, political radicalism refers when someone promotes a radical thought and wants to establish a profound change in politics structures that are in force. In England, The Glorious Revolution resulted from the fall of catholic James II who was replaced by his protestant daughter Mary and her husband William III. George I ascended the throne after Mary and William’s death. Moreover, there were two different and opposite political parties in the parliament of England: Whig (liberal party) and Tory (conservative party). Another point related to England is that there was a contrast between poverty and wealth in London, and therefore it became a disreputable city.…

    • 2122 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American Revolution displayed certain stages throughout that matched with the broad general pattern. As a prelude before the Revolution itself, there were already preliminary symptoms of unrest within America that followed the first step in the general pattern of revolutions. Prior to the initial shots in 1775, growing discontent against the British Government who were passing certain acts that the Americans thought as very unfair had already risen to a high degree. With the majority of acts incurring economic and financial costs, by 1767, the Townshend Acts had been passed, putting further taxes on paper, glass and tea. Upon the taxes that the Stamp Act of 1965 incurred on such items as newspapers, official documents and almanacs, the American people became highly agitated and a feeling of resentment quickly spilled over the masses, ‘several person were for dying rather than submitting to it...’ [pg52 Maier, P.] Additionally, the Colonialist became increasingly violent, ‘Almost immediately after the Acts [implementation], outbreak of mob activity. By 1770, the preliminary symptom of unrest displayed through protest and discontent was evident. The Colonialist did not feel that they were obligated to be subject to these taxes without representation in British Parliament. Additionally, the psychological pre-condition associated with the cause of war was present in the Colonialist discontent regarding the numerous Acts bearing economic consequences. Not only had the events up till 1770 displayed active protests and early mob activity, it also hinted at the potential oncoming violence the growing mob could inflict which was the next step in the general broad pattern of revolutions.…

    • 1506 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is also supports the idea that it was not revolutionary because William did not immediately assume Kingship, and instead called an assembly and a Parliament to sort out lawfully who should be King or not. In the case of a revolution, the actions of those taking over are usually much more decisive and radical.…

    • 989 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays