Preview

To What Extent Was Responsible For Henry Viii's Failure

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
597 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
To What Extent Was Responsible For Henry Viii's Failure
I agree with this view that Henry VIII was responsible for the English foreign policy failures in the years 1509-1529, and this is because he was too keen to establish his presence in international affairs and believed that he had to demonstrate his strengths to his subjects. This way of thought was due to his peaceful rise to the throne and because of his confident personality; Henry wanted to win victories on the battlefield and wanted to establish his image of a Renaissance warrior.

Henry’s first failure was in France, 1512. Henry persuaded his advisers that a foreign campaign would benefit England’s reputation, so he led an army to France in hope to revive the hostilities there, but achieved little as the expenditure was rapidly increasing and the soldiers, whom were ill or suffering from disease, then proceeded to quickly return back to England. Apart
…show more content…
Henry did not self-indulge in financial or any matters, he stated what he wanted and relied on other people; Henry VIII was practically the opposite of his father, Henry VII. Henry also spent his wealth, he enjoyed grand feasts and owning luxurious items; he had the true image of a King. This could have led to his and England’s weakness, as the French and Habsburgs monarchies were great in size and wealth, and England couldn’t even compete with them, it was too weak.

Another aspect was that Henry didn’t and couldn’t have a lot of victories, this was due to England being poor. Instead, the 20 year old French successor, Francis I invaded northern Italy and recaptured Milan from the Habsburgs. Francis, like Henry, wanted to be the centre of attention and he could afford to. Another person who made Henry look weaker, was Charles V who became the King of Spain, The Holy Roman Emperor and the Duke in the Netherlands, he was the ultimate ruler, whereas Henry lacked great titles so couldn't compete and couldn't improve his ‘warrior

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    There were many successes of their (Henry and Wolsey’s) foreign policy. Wolsey was a successful peace broker, and the treaty of London in 1518 was a great example of him ability. This treaty in 1518 was an agreement of peace which seemed to put England in to the centre of diplomatic affairs in Europe (which was what Henry wanted). The treaty bound France, Spain, the Papacy, HRE and England against the Turkish. At the time it seemed like a great success as it seemed to signify the end of fear of England being isolated in Europe, however in the long term it failed despite the short term success.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, Henry didn’t always get his way. Early on in his reign he made an agreement with Maximilian of Burgundy to aid him in his campaign against the French and the Flemish so long as…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gaining international recognition and influence for England was a big part of Henry’s foreign policy; this was because England had not been an active part of European affairs since the end of the hundred year’s war in 1453. So with Henry’s ascension to the throne and wanting to make g his mark this was a very important factor on judging how effective the foreign policy was because this was one of the more consistent of the factors of the foreign policy from 1515 to 1529. An example was in 1513 Henry gained Tournai and Therouanne, this is a good example of how the foreign policy was effective as Tournai was a significant achievement as although it wasn’t a city of great economic or strategic importance it was internationally known therefore bringing England prestige, this would add to the international recognition got England. The capture of Therouanne in the same year also meant that Henry was gaining…

    • 3141 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry had great success when dealing with The Yorkshire Rebellion 1498. It occurred when conflict between the Earl of Northumberland and the people of Northumberland and York sparked. The people were reluctant to pay more taxes and the Earl of Northumberland was killed when explaining about the situation...this is when the rebellion began. Henry was able to stop the rebellion quickly and swiftly, the leader of the rebellion was hung along with him accomplices, showing how Henry was able to deal with challenges to his authority smoothly and efficiently. The Yorkshire Rebellion was a local affair that did little to threaten the security of the realm therefore Henry was fully successful in dealing with this challenge.…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe that Henry VIII was ultimately unsuccessful in his aims from 1509-1514. He had three mains aims during this time and these were to secure the dynasty that Henry VII had created, assert his authority over his new kingdom and Foreign Policy, which Henry was planning to completely change. Various factors and traits contributed to this lack of success, which will be explored in this essay.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It might be inferred that Henry was less than impressive as he was clearly insecure. Source two shows Henry seeking to compare favourability with his rival king Francis I of France. He persistently asks the Venetian ambassador whether he is more physically impressive than Francis e.g. Henry asks ‘what sort of legs has he got?’ Such insecurity might encourage challenges as Henry could be seen as unconfident about his own authority. This argument could gain weight from the fact that the ambassador would be seeking to provide accurate information to the government of Venice. It could however be seen as the only one incident by a king who had only been on the throne for six years. Also it is not sustained in the other two sources.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Source C’s disagreement with the suggestion that Henry and Wolsey conducted an effective foreign policy in the years 1515-30 is also backed up with source A as source A says “Although there were some obvious large scale failures, especially between 1515-25 and 1529” source A also is partly talking about the failure of the amicable grant which resulted in England being sidelined from European affairs.…

    • 768 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Roman Catholic Church was very powerful in England. Henry hated the fact that his country should allow someone else to have so much power of them. After all, Henry was very lustful for power, and was used to getting what he wants when he wants!…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Warfare was the way Kings achieved this. David Potter is quite sceptical about such high flown ambitions but other historians believe that this objective underpinned Henry’s character. Driving factor was rivalry with Francis I and Charles V. 3 ambitious young monarchs…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Henry V had two major areas of impact, his first campaign into France in 1415, in which he captured a powerful tool in the form of the castle Harfluer. During the same campaign he won a decisive victory at Agincourt, smashing the French opponents even when heavily outnumbered. His other area of significance was his second campaign into France, in which he would eventually conquer all of Normandy and take the French crown for England. Henry V achieved all of the goals during his lifetime; he conquered and occupied all the northern areas of France. Most importantly though, is that he secured the throne of France for England.…

    • 3238 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the devastating fall of Cardinal Thomas Wolsey, to the rise of his successor, the relentless Thomas Cromwell. Cromwell, throughout the course of English history has continually been portrayed as the main villain during Henry VIII’s reign, aside from Henry himself of course. A man, who thought nothing of betraying friends or allies in his conquest to secure the most notorious career in history. Since Henry VIII sent his chief minister and close advisor to the scaffold five centuries ago on 28 July 1540, historians have debated on the characterisation of Cromwell. Was he a manipulative death merchant who, throughout his political career killed and victimised thousands of innocent people for obeying their religious beliefs. Or was Cromwell simply a man of modest decent, risen from the ashes of his poor upbringing, due to his impeccable intelligence and determination?…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry VI and the Nobility

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages

    extremely weak one with Henry VI who seemed to show a clear lack of interest in ruling the country, and…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite this being the main reason, it is true that Wolsey’s unpopularity was a factor that contributed as well, his many enemies at court provided reasons for Henry to remove him but Henry didn’t get rid of his straight away because Wolsey was able to do what he asked. However, when he failed, Henry took into consideration these enemies (especially the Duke of Norfolk because of his family ties with Anne Boleyn.) and his failures with gaining the nobilities favour. Therefore Wolsey’s ultimate downfall was the failure of not securing an annulment, but his unpopularity and minor failures such as the subsidies were contributing factors to the most important reasons of why he eventually fell from…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry the Young, crowned by his father in 1172 as co-regent of the Kingdom of England and the duchy of Normandy, led one of the main rebellion that Henry II affronted during is reign. During two years, 1173-74, Henry the Young moved war against his father with the support…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people wonder why King Henry VIII, was such a brutal king. King Henry had six wives, he lost one due to a jousting accident. Henry wanted his tomb a certain way so he tried to have it made, however they didn’t get it made in time. As a young boy Henry was given a special task from Prince Arthur. King Henry just wanted a male heir for the throne and was willing to do anything to get one. I personally do not agree with what he did.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays