Preview

To what extent were the Scots guilty of naivety in their dealings with Edward I in the period 1286 – 1292?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2792 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
To what extent were the Scots guilty of naivety in their dealings with Edward I in the period 1286 – 1292?
To what extent were the Scots guilty of naivety in their dealings with Edward I in the period 1286 – 1292?
“The Crown of medieval Scotland is dominated by the crisis of inheritance of 1286 to 1292, events which in turn provoked the bitter Wars of Independence against England.”1 ***
The actions of the Scottish kingdom towards Edward I and England within the time period of 1286 – 1292 has provided a basis of great scrutiny and speculation over the years. With the death of Alexander III, Scotland was plunged into a Succession Crisis, from which a guardianship was formed to provide governance over the kingdom of Scotland. During the time following Alexander III's death, Edward I became an influential and involved constituent towards this guardianship. However, can the Scottish kingdom's decision to involve the King of England in the country's affairs be perceived as an act of naivety or was it a piece of sensible pragmatism? Furthermore, in events such as the Treaties of both Birgham and Salisbury, along with those of the Great Cause and election of John Balliol as King of Scots, all including Edward I's presence, it is possible that the kingdom of Scotland blindingly accepted the aid of their most powerful neighbour without truly considering the English king's own intentions. Death of Alexander III, 1286 With the death of Alexander III in 1286, also came the threat of civil war and the crisis of succession. Being outlined as an act of pragmatism by historian Neil Oliver2, it had been agreed following the death of Alexander III’s son, the Prince of Scotland, that Eric II’s daughter (and Alexander III’s grand-daughter) Margaret, known as the ‘Maid of Norway’, would become the accepted heir to the Scottish throne. Therefore, from 1286 – 1292, in the absence of a monarch, Scotland was governed by six Scottish nobles (Bishops Fraser and Wishart, representing the church; earls Alexander Comyn of Buchan and Duncan MacDuff of Fife; and barons John Comyn of Badenoch

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The book 1066 The Year of the Conquest by David Howarth is an overview of one of the most important years in England’s history. At the start of 1066 the death of King Edward would spark a series of events that would eventually lead to the changes in England. Throughout the book it discusses this dramatic year and all these events that took place from various different perspectives. These stories are from contemporary sources from all sides of the conflict explaining their perspective of what was happening during this time. As one might expect, the people living through this will obviously form bias opinions based on where they are from. Howarth does a great job of staying neutral, giving him the ability to tell every story as it is while also adding his own personal insight. In addition to the various perspectives, he does a great job of bringing forth a historic event and not holding it to today’s standards.…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the years 1511-25, England managed to successfully pursue a policy of peacemaking due to Wolsey’s excellent diplomatic skills and managed to negotiate peace at London in 1518 between twenty countries and become a leading power in European affairs; this reflected extremely well on England’s image with the rest of Europe and could be viewed as the basis for the argument that the policy was successful. Further argument for the successes in foreign policy outweighing failures could be made by referring to the successful initial invasion campaigns against France between 1512-13 as well as the several peace negotiations England had arranged up until the year 1525, the several invasions it had fended off on the Scottish border as well as Wolsey’s immense skills in funding the policy. In this essay I will be looking at whether these successes outweigh the failures in foreign policy.…

    • 1761 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    7. nnocent Annulling the Magna Carta from The Letters of Pope Innocent III (1198-1216), Concerning England and Wales edited and translated by Christopher R. Cheney and Mary G. Cheney, (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967), pp. 212-16…

    • 2243 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Edward VI died in 1483, there was debate as to who was most suited to take up his position on the throne. It has been argued that Richard, Duke of Gloucester had himself set on usurping the throne from the rightful heir Edward V, as soon as his brother died. Others argue that it was never the case that his immediate wishes were to seize the throne; actions after his brother’s death led him to this decision. There is evidence for and against to support the principal statement.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. Enhance his reputation and ambition. Comparisons with other great warrior Kings eg. Henry V.…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 1470 Edward IV’s rule was challenged by the former monarch that he had usurped, Henry VI, and one of the key reasons as to why he was able to overcome this challenge was due to his popularity as king. Edward had proved to be an able king who was also young, strong and handsome, which is severely juxtaposed to the monarch he had usurped, as Henry VI was old, a less than capable ruler and thought to be insane. This meant that not only his original usurpation of Henry in 1461 was considered more acceptable to England’s population as it was most likely going to better the country; it also meant that Henry’s usurpation of Edward in 1470 was especially unfavourable with the population. Another reason why Edward was able to overcome his challenge of usurpation was at that time France was very unpopular with England, which is unsurprising as it is said that ‘England’s national hobby was going to war with France’, and Henry VI’s wife, Margaret of Anjou was the French kings niece. This marriage alone would be enough to make Edward appear more favourable with the general population; however it seemed likely that if Edward had not usurped, an alliance between the two countries would proceed, which only served to support Edward’s campaign to get back on the throne. Nonetheless, the most damaging factor to the position of the opposition is most likely the circumstances that the Lancastrian house found themselves in as with the deaths of both their key supporter, the Earl of Warwick, at the Battle of Barnet and of the Lancastrian heir, Edward, Prince of Wales at Tewkesbury, the Lancastrian position was no longer considered viable. The popularity of Edward IV was not repeated with Richard III however, and this combined with the fact he usurped a king that was showing great…

    • 1818 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A question such as this is not a straightforward answer; there are many arguments for and against his success with the Godwin's. The Godwin's power changed over time from when Godwin was bought up through power under the reign of Cnut right up until when Edward declared Harold to be the next king on his death bed. Edward needed to control the power of the Godwin's in order to keep his own power because if he did not control them they would overthrow him from the throne. He had to give them a certain amount of power by weighing up the balance of power between himself and the Godwin's very carefully. One factor is the Dover incident, and how he dealt with the Godwin's during and after the incident. He dealt with the family members individually: Godwin, Edith, Swegn, Harold and Tostig. One other factor is Edward sitting back and allowing Harold to look as if he is in control, but ultimately having control himself. These are the points that will decide the balance of the argument and question presented.…

    • 2051 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    ‘Scotland was a Patriarchacal Society’, to what extent is this view of Scottish Society during the Inter-war period valid?…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Tongue nor heart cannot conceive nor name thee!” (2.3. 74). Thy greatest king hath been murdered. Thoughts of sorrow and wondering have filled thee. Who wouldst do such a thing? Was thy host not watchful enough with the most honored man in his presence? Maybe thou should have stayed with his Majesty for he is of the highest nobility and honor possible. Who ever hath committed this crime is guilty of murder and treason. Oh! The people, the people! What shall become of them without thy leader? Will the criminals roam the streets, with the people fearing to leave their homes? All of these are questions with no answers! I do believe it’s my turn to step in and allow myself the privilege of discovering which fiend it was that hath murdered his Majesty, the king. At first, it was thought to be the beast like guards who stood outside the king’s chamber. It deeply concerns me as to why Macbeth would dispose of them so soon after the death of his royal highness without the chance to probe their minds with questions and make them face the rest of Scotland as those whom betrayed their leader. Maybe it was the sons of the great Duncan which have set up the murderous plot to gain the throne for their own selfish purpose. The fact that they have left the country and fled in opposite directions is beyond my knowledge. If they wanted to be king, why murder your own father and flee to a different country…? What about the recently promoted Thane of Cawdor? He holds much too great of an honor and sincerely respected Duncan. But still, he did murder the guards; maybe he was hiding something like a vital piece of information. Now that I think of it, if I had been the one in Macbeth’s position, I too may have lost my temper. In the wise words of Macbeth, “Who can be wise, amazed, temp’rate, and furious,/ Loyal, and neutral, in a moment? No man.” (2.3. 27-28).…

    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Jacobite risings of 1715 and 1745-46 were the two most serious threats to the Hanoverian crown in 18th Century Britain. Although there were numerous smaller attempts at returning the Stuarts to the throne the ’15 and ’45 remain the closest to succeeding. This essay will look at several of the contributing factors to the failures of these risings.…

    • 1427 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Miss

    • 2003 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When Edward IV claimed the throne in the Battle of Townton and established the Yorkist dynasty, it was thought that this young and strong man would rule without problems from those other than the Lancastrians. However in 1469 his closest adviser and ‘king maker’, Warwick turned against him in favour of the weak Lancastrian Henry VI. It is argued that it was Warwick’s own selfish and uncontrolled ambition which led to this breach between two friends, however numerous factors may have also caused this end, for example Edwards unscrupulous marriage to Elizabeth Woodville and the differing opinions to foreign policy, which would lead to the breach in friendship and yet another war between the Lancastrians and Yorkist leaders.…

    • 2003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Explain why Edward IV’s death opened up such a bitter family feud in the weeks from 9th April to 26th June 1483 (12 marks)…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scotland is “under a hand accursed” (3.6.52). Macbeth is not a blessing for Scotland, but is a damned power that brings…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Which means that he must pretend he doesn't know who killed Duncan and he has to convince his heart to do the same too so he doesn't show any evidence or weakness about the truth of him killing Duncan. As planned after killing Duncan he becomes the next king of Scotland.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In William Shakespeare's tragedy, Macbeth, Macbeth’s greed leads to his downfall; his death. In eleventh century Scotland, war, bloodshed, and cruelty were all common occurrences. Duncan, the elected King of Scotland, is bravely fighting a war at the play’s opening in 1040. Macbeth, the Thane of Glamis, is also fighting. Following the battle, Macbeth tirelessly works to become king and maintain his kingship. The greed he displays while committing those acts, as well as the greed he displays through his interpretation of the apparitions, cause his downfall. Macbeth’s greed negatively affects the kingdom of Scotland by being the catalyst of mass chaos and death throughout the land, which is only unraveled at Macbeth’s demise.…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays