Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

tobacco and its effect on health

Good Essays
1499 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
tobacco and its effect on health
History[edit]
Concern about health effects of tobacco has a long history. Gideon Lincecum, an American naturalist and practitioner of botanical medicine, wrote in the early 19th century on tobacco: "This poisonous plant has been used a great deal as a medicine by the old school faculty, and thousands have been slain by it. ... It is a very dangerous article, and use it as you will, it always diminishes the vital energies in exact proportion to the quantity used - it may be slowly, but it is very sure."[15]
The late-19th century invention of automated cigarette-making machinery in the American South made possible mass production of cigarettes at low cost, and cigarettes became elegant and fashionable among society men as the Victorian era gave way to the Edwardian. In 1912, American Dr. Isaac Adler was the first to strongly suggest that lung cancer is related to smoking.[16] In 1924, economist Irving Fisher wrote an anti-smoking article for the Readers Digest, which said "... tobacco lowers the whole tone of the body and decreases its vital power and resistance ... tobacco acts like a narcotic poison, like opium and like alcohol, though usually in a less degree".[17] In 1929, Fritz Lickint of Dresden,Germany, published a formal statistical evidence of a lung cancer-tobacco link, based on a study showing that lung cancer sufferers were likely to be smokers.[18] Lickint also argued that tobacco use was the best way to explain the fact that lung cancer struck men four or five times more often than women (since women smoked much less).[18]
Prior to World War I, lung cancer was considered to be a rare disease, which most physicians would never see during their career.[19][20] With the postwar rise in popularity of cigarette smoking, however, came an epidemic of lung cancer.
In 1950, Richard Doll published research in the British Medical Journal showing a close link between smoking and lung cancer.[21] Four years later, in 1954, the British Doctors Study, a study of some 40,000 doctors over 20 years, confirmed the suggestion, based on which the government issued advice that smoking and lung cancer rates were related.[22] The British Doctors Study lasted until 2001, with results published every ten years and final results published in 2004 by Doll and Richard Peto.[23] Much early research was also done by Alton Ochsner. Reader's Digest magazine for many years published frequent anti-smoking articles. On January 11, 1964, the United States Surgeon General'sReport on Smoking and Health was published; this led millions of American smokers to quit, the banning of certain advertising, and the requirement of warning labels on tobacco products.
Studies[edit]
The term "smoker" is used to mean a person who habitually smokes tobacco on a daily basis. This category has been the focus of the vast majority of tobacco studies. However, the health effects of less-than-daily smoking are far less well understood. Studies have often taken the data of "occasional smokers" (those who have never smoked daily) and grouped them with those who have never smoked.[24]
In the 1930s German scientists showed that cigarette smoking caused lung cancer.[25]:15 In 1938 a study by a Johns Hopkins University scientist suggested a strongly negative correlation between smoking and lifespan. In 1950 five studies were published in which "smoking was powerfully implicated in the causation of lung cancer".[26] These included the now classic paper "Smoking and Carcinoma of the Lung" which appeared in the British Medical Journal. This paper reported that "heavy smokers were fifty times as likely as non-smokers to contract lung cancer".[21][26]
In 1953, scientists at the Sloan-Kettering Institute in New York City demonstrated that cigarette tar painted on the skin of mice caused fatal cancers.[25] This work attracted much media attention; the New York Times and Life both covered the issue. The Reader's Digest published an article entitled "Cancer by the Carton".[25]:14
A team of British scientists headed by Richard Doll carried out a longitudinal study of 34,439 medical specialists from 1951 to 2001, generally called the "British Doctors Study."[23]The study demonstrated that about half of the persistent cigarette smokers born in 1900–1909 were eventually killed by their addiction (calculated from the logarithms of the probabilities of surviving from 35–70, 70–80, and 80–90) and about two thirds of the persistent cigarette smokers born in the 1920s would eventually be killed by their addiction.
The health effects of tobacco have been significant for the development of the science of epidemiology. As the mechanism of carcinogenicity is radiomimetic or radiological, the effects are stochastic. Definite statements can be made only on the relative increased or decreased probabilities of contracting a given disease; For a particular individual, it is impossible to definitively prove a direct causal link between exposure to a radiomimetic poison such as tobacco smoke and the cancer that follows; such statements can only be made at the aggregate population level. Tobacco companies have capitalized on this philosophical objection and exploited the doubts of clinicians, who consider only individual cases, on the causal link in the stochastic expression of the toxicity as actual disease.[27]
There have been multiple court cases on the issue that tobacco companies have researched the health effects of tobacco, but suppressed the findings or formatted them to imply lessened or no hazard.[27]
A 2006 European study on occasional smoking published findings that the risk of the major smoking-related cancers for occasional smokers was 1.24 times that of those who have never smoked at all but the result was not statistically significant. (For a confidence interval of 95%, this data showed an incidence rate ratio of 0.80 to 1.94.)[24] (Data reduction used Cox proportional hazard model, stratified by gender and country.) This compares to studies showing that habitual heavy smokers have greater than 50 times the incidence of smoking-related cancers. After a ban on smoking in all enclosed public places was introduced in Scotland in March 2006, there was a 17 percent reduction in hospital admissions for acute coronary syndrome. 67% of the decrease occurred in non-smokers.[28]
A study published in the journal Pediatrics refers to the danger posed by what the authors call "third-hand smoke" — toxic substances that remain in areas where smoking has recently occurred.[29]
Overview and prevalence[edit]

Percentage of females smoking any tobacco product

Percentage of males smoking any tobacco product. Note that there is a difference between the scales used for females and the scales used for males.[3]
Tobacco may be consumed by either smoking or other smokeless methods such as chewing, the World Health Organization (WHO) only collects data on smoked tobacco.[1] Smoking has therefore been studied more extensively than any other form of consumption.[2]
In 2000, smoking was practiced by 1.22 billion people, predicted to rise to 1.45 billion people in 2010 and 1.5 to 1.9 billion by 2025. If prevalence had decreased by 2% a year since 2000 this figure would have been 1.3 billion in 2010 and 2025.[30] Despite dropping by 0.4 percent from 2009 to 2010, the United States still reports an average of 17.9 percent usage.[31]
As of 2002, about twenty percent of young teens (13–15) smoke worldwide, with 80,000 to 100,000 children taking up the addiction every day—roughly half of whom live in Asia. Half of those who begin smoking in adolescent years are projected to go on to smoke for 15 to 20 years.[32]
The WHO states that "Much of the disease burden and premature mortality attributable to tobacco use disproportionately affect the poor". Of the 1.22 billion smokers, 1 billion of them live in developing or transitional nations. Rates of smoking have leveled off or declined in the developed world.[33] In the developing world, however, tobacco consumption is rising by 3.4% per year as of 2002.[32]
The WHO in 2004 projected 58.8 million deaths to occur globally,[34]:8 from which 5.4 million are tobacco-attributed,[34]:23 and 4.9 million as of 2007.[35] As of 2002, 70% of the deaths are in developing countries.[35]
The shift in prevalence of tobacco smoking to a younger demographic, mainly in the developing world, can be attributed to several factors. The tobacco industry spends up to $12.5 billion annually on advertising, which is increasingly geared towards adolescents in the developing world because they are a very vulnerable audience for the marketing campaigns. Adolescents have more difficulty understanding the long term health risks that are associated with smoking and are also more easily influenced by “images of romance, success, sophistication, popularity, and adventure which advertising suggests they could achieve through the consumption of cigarettes”. This shift in marketing towards adolescents and even children in the tobacco industry is debilitating to organizations’ and countries’ efforts to improve child health and mortality in the developing world. It reverses or halts the effects of the work that has been done to improve health care in these countries, and although smoking is deemed as a “voluntary” health risk, the marketing of tobacco towards very impressionable adolescents in the developing world makes it less of a voluntary action and more of an inevitable shift.[5]
Many government regulations have been passed to protect citizens from harm caused by public environmental tobacco smoke. The "Pro-Children Act of 2001" prohibits smoking within any facility that provides health care, day care, library services, or elementary and secondary education to children.[36] On May 23, 2011, New York City enforced a smoking ban for all parks, beaches, and pedestrian malls in an attempt to eliminate threats posed to civilians by environmental tobacco smoke.[37]

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    We are all aware that smoking cigarettes is highly correlated towards lung cancer and is more than likely the cause most of the time. Also, tobacco itself is responsible for 90% of cases of lung cancer. What also falls under the use of tobacco and can cause lung cancer are pipe and cigar smoking, second hand smoking, asbestos fibers that you breathe in, radon gas and lastly the air pollution. Those who smoke about a pack of cigarettes a day raise their chances of lung cancer 25 times higher than a non-smoker and those who smoke pipes or cigars are about 5 times…

    • 1019 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lung Cancer Doesn’t Just Affect Smokers: Although smoking is the most significant risk factor for lung cancer, 13% of patients diagnosed with the deadly disease have never smoked. Other factors include sustained exposure to asbestos or other pollutants, and genetic predisposition.…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    p3 unit 12 public health

    • 1371 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Lung cancer: Lung cancer is the uncontrolled growth of abnormal cells that start off in one or both lungs but is usually in the cells that line the air passages. The abnormal cells do not develop into healthy lung tissue, they divide rapidly and form tumours. It is health concern as "Doctors in Britain are 'missing opportunities ' to spot lung cancer at an early stage," BBC News reports. A study found around a third of people with the condition die within 90 days of their initial diagnosis. http://www.nhs.uk and because there are usually no signs or symptoms in the early stages of lung cancer it is hard to diagnose so more people are dying from this cancer. Lung cancer is on the increase especially in women because of the sharp decrease in the incidence of male lung cancer over the past two decades reflects the decline in smoking prevalence among men. ‘Female smokers are also twice as likely to develop lung cancer as male smokers’ http://www.nhs.uk it is on the increase becuase…

    • 1371 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    We developed an understanding of the long and short term risks with smoking through researching on the internet on websites to do with cancer research and ASH. We discovered a lot of benefits to stopping smoking. One benefit was that their life expectancy increased and stopping also helped their lungs to recover and decreased the risk of contracting diseases such as Emphysema. We found information about pregnant women and their unborn children and how smoking can effect them. We found that the child could be miscarried, or they could have a considerably lower birth rate compared to other children whose mothers didn’t smoke during their pregnancy. Furthermore, we also found information about how harmful passive smoking is to children and adults. We found out that young children could experience cot death and become deaf through middle ear disease. Furthermore, we found information supporting that adults could contract lung cancer through passive smoke which we found was 80% invisible.…

    • 1734 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Silence That Kills

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In addition, Haviland, with this article wishes to inform readers about the dangers of tobacco use. By explaining some of the effects that smoking may cause on your health and others around you, the author continues to grab the reader’s attention. Haviland minimizes the use of personal pronouns while describing such matters. By only including calculations and research done by professionals, she eliminates the idea of her article being faulty. However, the author does not mention that other factors present in our air can cause such problems. She decides not to mention this,…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Smoking causes the majority of lung cancers in smokers. The amount of lung cancer is powerfully connected with cigarette smoking, with about 90% of lung cancers rising ,as a result of tobacco use. The risk of lung cancer rises with the number of cigarettes smoked over time; doctors state to this risk in terms of pack-years of smoking history. Doctors believe smoking causes lung cancer by damaging the cells that mark the lungs. When one breathes in cigarette smoke, which is full of cancer-causing materials, changes in the lung tissue begin almost rapidly. In the beginning one’s body may be able to heal this harm. Even so, with each frequent exposure, normal cells that line one’s lungs are gradually damaged. As time passed, the damage leads cells to act oddly and finally cancer can progress.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap Stats Smoking

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Over the years, researchers have been trying to connect smoking to lung cancer. They have finally come to this conclusion and are now trying to link smoking to other coronary heart diseases. Research has been done in many countries, and the results have shown that there was a moderate relationship to cigarette consumption and heart diseases. Through a regression, it has been proven that there is a link to the two factors. The U.S is also trying to cut their consumption in half.…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tobacco was the first crop grown for money in North America. In 1964 the Surgeon General of the U.S. wrote a report about the dangers of cigarette smoking. He said that the nicotine and tar in cigarettes cause lung cancer. Due to his report by the 1980’s they developed new cigarettes with lower amounts of nicotine and better filters (History & Economics of Tobacco).The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) launched the first ever paid national tobacco campaign. In March of 2012 they began to use real people instead of actors (Centers of Disease Control and Prevention). The illustration of loading a revolver with cigarettes is a strong visual way to get people’s attention on the harms of smoking. Also, the facts listed are making…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Regulation Tabacco

    • 10816 Words
    • 44 Pages

    Wynder, E.L. Tobacco and health: A review of the history and suggestions for public health policy. Public Health Reports 103: 8-18, 1988.…

    • 10816 Words
    • 44 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drinking Age Essay

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Cigarettes are a known carcinogen and have been known since the late 1940’s and may also be described…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cigarette Litigation

    • 2352 Words
    • 10 Pages

    As the evidence about the health hazards of smoking accumulated, and especially after the 1964 surgeon general's report, liability protection. The cigarette companies continued to aim propaganda about the smoking and health controversy at the general public. The Cigarette Papers describes plans in 1969 for a public relations campaign intended to set aside in the minds of millions the false conviction that cigarette smoking causes lung cancer and other diseases. As late as 1985, R.J. Reynolds ran misleading ads suggesting that a large epidemiological study had not found evidence of a link between smoking and heart disease.…

    • 2352 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    cons for marijuana

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Then, in the 1960s, things changed. Science stepped in and began to study tobacco use and learned what big tobacco already knew. And more. The link to lung cancer was rapidly established, and warning labels were affixed to the side of every package. The reaction among smokers was immediate and visceral; they were irate that their drug of choice was being called into question; they denied and challenged the findings and, with the help of the tobacco industry, found flaws with the science.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    With tobacco smoke containing more than 60 carcinogenic substances, the most deadly effects result for cancers. The most common, potentially fatal is lung cancer. About 10 – 20% of smokers contract fatal lung cancer in their lifetime, meaning the collection of lung cancer cases today are in fact around 90% smokers. Of course, other cancers can be a result and these include mouth, throat, liver, kidney and…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to the National Cancer Institute, lung cancer is the second most common cancer and primary cause of cancer-related death in both men and women in the United States. The overall death rate for lung and bronchus cancers rose steadily through the 1980s, peaked in the early 1990s, and has been slowly declining since 2001. Trends in lung cancer incidence and death rates have closely mirrored historical patterns of smoking prevalence, after accounting for a gap period. Because the prevalence of smoking peaked later in women than in men, lung cancer incidence and death rates began declining later for women than men. The incidence rate has been declining since the mid-1980s in men but only since the mid-2000s in women; the mortality rate began declining in 1991 in men and but not until 2003 in women. Incidence and mortality rates are highest among African American men, followed by white men.…

    • 264 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should Tobacco Be Illegal

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Tobacco is deeply ingrained into the roots of America and is a very addictive and…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays