Tobacco Marketing Plain Packaging
Tobacco use is a modifiable risk factor that is directly related to chronic diseases such as stroke, cancer and heart disease. The economic impact of tobacco use is significant, with an estimated 7.5 billion spent in Ontario alone in 2011 . Increased efforts by the government to reduce marketing venues have been implemented to attempt to reduce the incidence of smoking .
In marketing a product, we often refer to the four ‘Ps’: price, promotion, product, and placement. The significance of marketing and how it affects our purchasing power has changed throughout the years. Marketing has now become a science as advertisers are conducting research on their demographics to know what would entice those individuals to buy their products . This has become an implicit science; the population may not recognize how much marketing impacts their consumption behaviours . Prone (1993) described how packaging redesign alone for US brand Rice-A-Roni increased sales by 20% within one year, and argues that packaging design can yield a higher return on investment than any other forms of marketing mix strategies.
Increased marketing restrictions on tobacco products have resulted in the cigarette package being the last and only means of advertising . The goals of advertising via cigarette packages are twofold, point of purchase advertising and communicating a brand image. The implementation of the tobacco retailer display ban in Canada has restricted point-of purchase display of tobacco products. The Tobacco Industry’s internal documentation found concrete proof of research into the characteristics of the pack that would entice certain individuals to purchase their brand over another . Evidence has been found that the packaging itself has been created to communicate characteristics of the cigarettes to their audience .
Smokers keep their packs close to them and reveal them countless times daily. Such behaviours expose other consumers to “incidental consumer brand encounters.”
In marketing a product, we often refer to the four ‘Ps’: price, promotion, product, and placement. The significance of marketing and how it affects our purchasing power has changed throughout the years. Marketing has now become a science as advertisers are conducting research on their demographics to know what would entice those individuals to buy their products . This has become an implicit science; the population may not recognize how much marketing impacts their consumption behaviours . Prone (1993) described how packaging redesign alone for US brand Rice-A-Roni increased sales by 20% within one year, and argues that packaging design can yield a higher return on investment than any other forms of marketing mix strategies.
Increased marketing restrictions on tobacco products have resulted in the cigarette package being the last and only means of advertising . The goals of advertising via cigarette packages are twofold, point of purchase advertising and communicating a brand image. The implementation of the tobacco retailer display ban in Canada has restricted point-of purchase display of tobacco products. The Tobacco Industry’s internal documentation found concrete proof of research into the characteristics of the pack that would entice certain individuals to purchase their brand over another . Evidence has been found that the packaging itself has been created to communicate characteristics of the cigarettes to their audience .
Smokers keep their packs close to them and reveal them countless times daily. Such behaviours expose other consumers to “incidental consumer brand encounters.”
Bibliography: Bero, L. (2003). Implications of the tobacco industry documents for public health and policy. Annual Review Public Health, 267-288. Cancer Care Ontario and Public Health Ontario. (2012). Taking Action to Prevent Chronic Disease: Recommendations for a Healthier Ontario. Toronto. Devenney, T. (2010). Analysis of Consumer Research Evidence on the Impact of. Sydney, Australia: University of Technology. DiFranza, J., Eddy, J., Brown, L., Ryan, J., & Bogojavlensky, A. (1994). Tobacco acquisition and cigarette brand selection among youth. Tobacco Control, 334-338. Enstrom, J., & Kabat, G. (2003). Environmental Tobacco Smoke and Tobacco Related Mortability in a Prospective Study of Californians . BMJ, 1960-1998. Ferraro, R., Bettman, J., & Chartrand, T. (2009). The power of strangers: The effect of incidental consumer brand encounters on brand choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 729-741. Ford, A., Moodie, C., & Hastings, G. (2012). The role of packaging for consumer products: Understanding the move towards plain tobacco packaging. Addiction Research and Theory, 339-347. Freeman, B., Chapman, S., & Rimmer, M. (2008). The case for the plain packaging of tobacco products. Addiction, 580-590. Germain, D., Wakefield, M., & Durkin, S. (2010). Adolescents`perceptions of cigarette brand image: Does plain packaging make a difference? Journal of Adolescent Health, 385-392. Health Canada. (2009). Tobacco Tax Act. Retrieved from http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hc-ps/tobac-tabac/res/news-nouvelles/act-loi-eng.php Health Canada Health Canada. (2011). Health Concerns. Retrieved from Canadian Tobacco Use Monitoring Survey: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hc-ps/tobac-tabac/research-recherche/stat/ctums-esutc_2011-eng.php#tab1 Hill, S Lansdell, G. (2012, November 17). Ottawa off hook in Big Tobacco suit; Quebec Court of Appeal rules government immune from $27-billion class action launched by smokers. The Toronto Star, p. A19. Moodie, C., Ford, A., Mackintosh, A., & Hastings, G. (2012). Young People`s Perceptions of Cigarette Packaging and Plain Packaging: An Onine Survey. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 98-105. Ontario Agency for Health Protection and Promotion. (2010). Evidence to Guide Action: Comprehensive Tobacco Control in Ontario. Toronto: Smoke-Free Ontario Scientific Advisory Committee. Pollay, R. (2000). Targeting youth and concerned smokers: Evidence from Canadian tobacco industry documents. Tobacco Control, 136-137. Prone, M. (1993). Package design has stronger ROI potential than many believe. Marketing News, 13. Statistics Canada. (2009). CANSIM. Retrieved from Deaths and mortality rate, by selected grouped causes and sex, Canada, provinces and territories annual: http://www5.statcan.gc.ca/cansim/a05?lang=eng&id=1020552 Stone, D Tye, J., Warner, K., & Stanton, G. (1987). Tobacco Advertising and Consumption: Evidence of a Causal Relationship. Journal of Public Health Policy, 492-508. Wakefield, M., Germain, D., Durkin, S., Hammond, D., Goldberg, M., & Borland, R. (2012). Do larger pictorial health warnings diminish the need for plain packaging of cigarettes? Addiction, 1-9.