Tom Donaldson's Idea Of Ethical Relativism

Tom Donaldson’s concept of ethical relativism and ethical absolutism in relation to the Google’s case rejects in not behaving as per the laws of that country when it started to do business there. The single response is as mature as idealistic dialogue.
According to the cultural relativism as per the universal rule, none of the culture’s ethics are any better than any off the others and hence there are no literal rights or wrongs. It all depends of the layman public how they consider and choose to see it. According to Tom Donaldson, if Google has considered doing the business in China, it was supposed to follow their ethical laws. Apparently this has been explained by the very statement; while in Rome behave like a Roman.
The cultural relativist’s section explains while you are in Rome , do things as the Romans do is a very tempting obsession, particularly when it is fading to do as similar as the local people do which means forgoing their own business opportunities. The shortage of enriching relativism, though, turns out to be very obvious when the practices in question are more destructive than any other malpractice. Adding to the above point, cultural relativism is ethically blind. There are few fundamental values that imply in the cross cultures, and the companies like Google must endorse them to keep up their own integrity.
This hypothesis which implies in the rear the ethical imperialism is nothing but the absolutism. These Absolutists consider that at hand is a particular catalog of truths, which can be spoken only with single set of concepts, and they also believe it is the same elsewhere in the world. This opposes with many people’s conviction that dissimilar cultural ethnicities should be