Preview

Topdog And Underdog Analysis

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2208 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Topdog And Underdog Analysis
Two brothers abandoned by their parents at a very premature age, learn first hand the very harsh and haunting results of being brought up without parental guidance. Topdog/Underdog, written by Suzan-Lori Parks, takes the audience into an environment composed of dialogue between only two characters. The two brothers, Lincoln and Booth; which were said to be names given to them as a cruel joke by their father, are forced to raise each other and fend for themselves. Lincoln, the older of the two, gives up a life of coning people out of their money to lead a more honest and respectable life, only to fall back into deceiving and cheating people once more. Booth, on the other hand, wishes he had the skills to “con” people and curses Lincoln for …show more content…

This is seen through the way Lincoln earns a living; taking money from innocent people on the streets without any remorse. “We took a father for the money he was gonna get his kids new bikes with and he cried in the street while we vanished” (55). Lincoln is stating how he would take people’s money, innocent good people’s money, and not even look back. Although Lincoln attempts to change his lifestyle, getting an honest job and making honest wages, he quickly returns to a lifestyle of cheating and coning people as soon as he gets fired from his first job. Booth does not partake in the coning game three-card monte, not because he is an honest, hardworking and respectable citizen, but simply because he is not good enough to be successful like Lincoln has been. His desire to play the game and earn a living by taking money from others is revealed through his constant begging of Lincoln to teach him to be a successful three-card monte conman, which Lincoln refuses. “We could be a team, man. Rake in the money!’ (20). Although Booth is not skilled in the game of coning people like his older brother, Booth’s desire to prosper by the means of making others suffer reveals a similarity between the psychological characteristics of him and his brother. Both brothers put …show more content…

Coming from a background of prospering at the expense of others loses, there seems to be a glimmer of hope for Lincoln’s overall character when he decides to follow a more respectable lifestyle and takes an honest job working in an arcade. It is when Lincoln is working at this job that it seems his character is strong enough to overcome the empty and horrible affects his childhood left on him. At the point when Lincoln begins to show initial signs of character growth, he is quickly brought back to the harsh life he has followed since childhood. Being fired and replaced by a wax dummy parallels the feeling of worthlessness his parents showed toward him throughout his life. Lincoln quickly falls back into the life of lying and coning to gain wealth that it seemed he had finally been able to escape. “Cause my shit is back. And better then it was when I left too” (84). Through the expressions and diction Lincoln uses when conversing with Booth, it appears that the internal struggle Lincoln is coping with is that of a battle between good and evil. Lincoln attempted to leave the life of sin and wrongdoing behind him when he got an honest job at the arcade, only to be overcome once more by sin and fall back down to the lifestyle he fought so hard to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    One study at UC Berkley showed that in a game of Monopoly, in which a random player receives a larger sum of money to begin the game in comparison to their opponents, that over time, this player will begin to feel entitled to the money he or she started with. This same idea of entitlement is prevalent in the play, Glengarry Glen Ross. The play demonstrates how a competitive, unfair work environment skews the perspective of the workers by making the people who lose feel mad at the system and the winners feel entitled to their earnings.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He comes to us, too, as the Great Emancipator who headed the North off to Civil War to free the slaves and subsequently offered his kindred Southerners a delicate and forgetting hand. Lincoln was the man who headed the slaves into the common war and eventually liberated them from the Southerners, whom he'd lended a hand after the war. This is the generally speaking perspective of Lincoln, which isn't fully accurate, and is demonstrated to not be totally right however history, demonstrating that he didn't have totally intensive and reliable perspectives and didn't dependably help nullification. He acknowledged how wrong it was that subjection ought to exist whatsoever in a self announced free and edified republic. Lincoln's emotions of the Declaration of Independence, which inside and out say that all men are made equivalent, disaffirm his nations agreeableness and shared traits around bondage. This at last pushes Lincoln to change his perspectives on subjection, instead of supporting it before and all around the war, while it was vital. Kansas-Nebraska Act -The enactment toppled the old Missouri Compromise line, which rejected subjection from the limitless northern zone of the old Louisiana Purchase domain. The demonstration then built another recipe for managing subjection in the national grounds: now Congress might stay out of the matter, and the individuals of every region might choose whether to hold or bandit the organization. This gesture toppled the Missouri Compromise which had awhile ago avoided region in the Louisiana Purchase domain and besides counteracted Congress from mediating, permitting the individuals to take care of their own issues with prominent power. This gesture advanced Congress' freedom to its nation and made it recoil and provided for it no force in the bargains and contentions its nation was managing and additionally left open a yawning opening of chance for professional bondage control. At that point in 1857 came the notorious Dred…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Suzan-Lori Parks' Topdog/Underdog story which journals the adults lives of two African-American brothers named Lincoln and Booth, where both have to create different identities in order for them to become successful and live the American dream. With the two brothers choosing different path and taking on someone's identity in order to be successful, still find themselves trapped in a cycle of poverty and familial angst. In an interview with Charlie Rose, Park claimed that Topdog/Underdog was just a play between two men and also claimed the play is about giving two African-American men the opportunity of getting together and working together on stage. Still, it is difficult to believe that a play in which a character named Booth shoots and kills…

    • 194 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The American Vision Modern Times Textbook, “Lincoln believed slavery to be morally wrong, and he opposed its spread into western territories.” Lincoln wants to show appreciation to the African American by letting being able to vote. After three day of Lincoln’s speech Booth put a commitment to himself that when Lincoln and his wife comes to see the play at the Ford’s Theatre. Also, with the connection to Ulysses S. Grant, hw will be to have the access to the President’s Box. Booth then, move to plan B and not the idea of kidnapping but rather planning to assisant e the president and his administration which are Lincoln the President, General…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In his article “Is business bluffing ethical?,” Albert Carr makes a distinction between an “unethical” poker player and a “crook.”…

    • 12131 Words
    • 49 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is best described in a critique written by Matthew D. Norman called “Anti-Lincoln.” This document is based on one of Master’s writings called “Lincoln-The Man”. In the critique, the author mostly tries to argue that Edgar Lee Masters was a major iconoclast. An iconoclasts is known as a person who attacks someone’s cherished beliefs or intuitions. They believe that this trait of his had a bad influence. I disagree with the author’s argument towards Masters. There are three quotes that support this. The first is when “Masters asserts that his biography is a “rational analysis” of Lincoln’s mind and nature that offers argument and interpretation.” This quote says directly that Masters himself in the back of this book wrote what he truly thought the writing was covering. He was just writing his opinion, not trying to be aggressive. The second is,” One died in a shameful child-birth, One of a thwarted love.” There are many examples that shows Masters is always a little dark. The final quote is,”But still I chiseled whatever they paid me to chisel, and made myself party at the false chronicles of stones.” In this line in the poem, Edgar states how his character is. He talks of being a chiseler and not caring about anyone who he chiseled headstones for. Even though most of the headstones he made were for his…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The story goes that after killing Lincoln, Booth was given safe passage to Texas by the Confederate underground ("Jesse James" 5). Once there he adopted the name John St. Helen and worked as a bartender ("Secret" 3). A problem arose, however, when Booth developed a drinking problem, and with it a tendency to shoot off his mouth about the life he used to lead ("Jesse James" 5). Booth in other words became a liability that needed to be dealt…

    • 2467 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    One of the most well known schemer and criminal of the white collar field was Bernie Madoff. The chameleon created an impression of being a nice and caring person at work, but ironically, deep down inside he was a deranged money hungry criminal. Many people could not believe the news they were hearing after he had confessed to the crimes he committed because he was really good at hiding the true person he was. He was a master at impression management. Quoted from Diana Goldberg “He was a hero to us, the head of NASDAQ. We were proud of everything he had accomplished”. They believed in him, he gained everyone’s trust by manipulating…

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In addition, he appeals to the guilt and obloquy felt about the war by the American people, both north and south. In order to do this, Lincoln calls to action those responsible: everyone, even himself; he wants the southerners to willfully renounce slavery because it is wrong according to the will of God saying: “It may seem strange that any men should dare to ask a just God's assistance in wringing their bread from the sweat of other men's faces” and with this, he appeals to the consciences of the former southern slave owners, and to show them that banning slavery was right. (44-47). Furthermore, as stated earlier, he uses his position as president to convince the people to strive for this change, but this might also cause a rift between himself and the southerners. In order to remedy this, he references the bible which both the northerners and…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Never boring: simple words that describe the simple life of one of the greatest American Heroes of all time. Over the years we have come to understand the Great Emancipator’s struggles and his determination to push for a better future for his nation. In the blink of war, Lincoln came to the nation’s rescue. But was Lincoln really the Great Emancipator? Was Lincoln actually opposed to the slavery movement? Or did he not consider the blacks to be an equal race? Did he make an active effort to free the slaves? Or was the emancipation a never Lincoln’s priority? In my opinion, although freeing the slaves was never Lincoln’s top priority during his tenure as president, Lincoln was sympathetic towards them. His main issue was the war and the probability of the union getting split into two. I believe that Lincoln may not have always seen the black race as equals and that the emancipation came about as a by-product of the Union getting saved.…

    • 2916 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A person can become deceitful to make themselves look innocent and have others view them as victims. When in times of desperation, individuals will become dishonest and insincere. Tom walker becomes deceitful after being accused of taking money from innocent people for his own personal interests. This is accusation is denied by Tom claiming "the devil take me if I have made a farthing" (Irving 331), acting as if he were innocent and his life would be threatened if he collected greats amount amount and did not give it to the devil. This is an attempt to seek for pity from his clients, possibly alerting their view of him from greedy thief to victim. In this case, Tom became deceitful as a ploy to further help him in getting what he wants by removing the negative attention off…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main display of this is shown through Huck at the end of the novel when he has a big decision on his hands. "I was a-trembling, because I'd got to decide, forever, betwixt two things, and I knowed it. I studied a minute, sort of holding my breath, and then says to myself: "All right then, I'll go to hell"—and tore it up" He forced to choose between tearing up his letter to Miss Watson and freeing the slave Jim, and sending the letter, telling her of his whereabouts. This choice wasn't about getting caught or not, it was about morals. At the time it was considered morally wrong to help free a slave. Huck realized this, but also thought about the time he spent with Jim, and the friendship they had acquired. Twain clearly shows us through the actions of Jim in the whole novel that he feels slavery is wrong. So in choosing to help free his black friend, and go to hell if that be the consequence, Huck shows us his high…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Abraham Lincoln is known as "The Great Emancipator" who freed the slaves. Yet in the early part of his career and even in the early stages of his presidency, Lincoln had no objection to slavery where it already existed, namely, in the Southern states. As a savvy politician, he always wanted to maintain the union, and he would use any device to keep the country together. However, his views on slavery evolved during his presidency, and the personal opposition towards slavery that he claimed he always had began to show through in his policy. As Lincoln noted in 1864, "I am naturally anti-slavery. If slavery is not wrong, nothing is wrong. I can not remember when I did not so think, and feel" (Lorence 306). Despite such strongly worded beliefs, Lincoln policies towards slavery often shifted for the sake of political expedience. For example, he pledged that states would be compensated for their loss of property as a result of emancipation to keep the border states from seceding. Still, by 1862 Lincoln had become firm in his convictions that slavery must be abolished. He even pressed for a constitutional amendment to ensure freedom to all the slaves. Lincoln espoused strong anti-slavery views, but he often put what he viewed as the good of the country ahead of the cause. Despite many detours along the way, he proved himself to be "The Great Emancipator." As a self-made politician from humble origins, Lincoln struggled in his early political life to define his identity. He described his childhood as "The short and simple annals of the poor. That's my life, and that's all you or any one else can make of it" (Oates 4). Lincoln felt extremely embarrassed about his background and worked his entire life to overcome the limitations he faced. He made himself a "literate and professional man who commanded the respect of his colleagues" (Oates 4). It is difficult to assess Lincoln's early views on slavery and race because they were constantly changing in an effort to achieve such…

    • 2258 Words
    • 65 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fraud, con-man, and hustler are all modern day terms to describe the age old character in African American literature known as the trickster. Today’s working definition of a trickster is one who swindles or plays tricks; often a mischievous figure in myth or folklore, who typically makes up for physical weakness through cunning and subversive humor. In African American literature the role of the trickster is a reoccurring theme, especially in the time period spanning from post Civil War to the Harlem Renaissance. During slavery and the years that followed the image of a trickster changed from a humorous amoral figure to a cunning and socially conscious icon. Charles W. Chesnutt is a primary example of an author, who faithful employs the trickster motif in many of his published works.…

    • 2035 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bernard Madoff

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages

    What can cause a man to take from so many for so long? What kind of human being can make promises that may only be fulfilled if someone else is left holding the bag? Throughout history, there have been many thief’s and cheats who have stole or ‘borrowed’ way past their limits and many who still financially plague society. In recent light, Bernard Madoff is the man on the stand who is still facing his June sentencing date which could be up to 150 years in prison.…

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics