1.1 Structure of the report
The report consists of three main chapters:
Chapter 1 includes the reason for choosing topic 8 and the reasons why I choose “Delphi Automotive” for my research report; the aims and objectives of the report; an explanation of my researching approaches in the analysis of financial and non-financial information.
Chapter 2 contains the information gathering sources and techniques; accounting and business techniques and limitations.
Chapter 3 includes detailed presentation of financial and business analysis by charts, sta-tistic evidence, and business analysis models, with detail comparison of Delphi Automotive against its main competitor Lear Corporation; it also contains the financial and business conclusions as well recommendation.
1.2 Reason for choosing the topic 8: An evaluation of the business and financial per-formance of Delphi Automotive
The company I work for Delphi Automotive (NYSE: DLPH) is a listed company. The strate-gy of the going global various challenges in the field of finance, the mostly widely emphasis of the goal of the company is to maximize the value of the company to its owner which is driving force to make the organization successful. Business can be carried on successfully with proper arrangement of funds, to meet long-term commitment, organization needs permanent capital and short-term commitment, working capital is needed as well. Regard-less of whether the business is big or small, business with finance is a wingless bird. Thus, finance is a significant facet of every business. Funds can be procured through various modes, bank and shareholders play the important role in the industrial economy of global organization. Before providing finance to the company, lenders and stockholders will as-sess the ability of business to repay its debt on maturity and capital employed return through the organization of financial statement. Analysis of financial statements helps the banker
Bibliography: 2. Madura, Jeff (2007). International Financial Management: Abridged 8th Edition. Mason, OH: Thomson South-Western. ISBN 0-324-36563-2. 3. Bradley, Nigel Marketing Research. Tools and Techniques.Oxford University Press, Ox-ford, 2010 4. Feltham, G 5. Al-Obaidan, Abdullah M. (2008) Optimal bank size: The case of the Gulf Cooperation Council countries, European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, vol. 11, pp.31-43. 6. Caves, D.W., Christenson and Diewert, W.E. (1982). The Economic Theory of Index Num-bers and Measurement of Input Output and Productivity, Econometric a, 50,1393-1414. 7. Companies Guide, Amman Stock Exchange Authority Book, No. 12-17, 2005-2010 Zip. 8. Maghyereh.A (2003) The Effect of Financial Liberalization on the Efficiency of Financial Institutions: The Case of Jordanian Commercial Banks, Social Science Research Network, Oct 9. Abemethy, M.A,Brownell,p.,(1999).The role of budgets in organization facing strategic change: an exploratory study 10. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), Special Committee on Finan-cial Reporting. (1994). Improving business reporting - A customer focus: Meeting the info-mation needs of investors and creditors. New York, NY: AICPA. 11. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), & Maisel, L. S. (2001). 12. American Accounting Association (1971).Report of the Committee on Non-Financial Measures of Effectiveness. The Accounting Review, Vol. 46, Supplement, 1971, pp. 165-211. 13. Anderson, E. W., Fornell, C, & Lehmann, D. R. (1994). Customer satisfaction, market share and profitability: Findings from Sweden. Journal of Marketing Research, 58, 53-66. 14. Banker, R. D., Potter, G., & Srinivasan, D. (2000). An empirical investigation of an incen-tive plan that includes nonfinancial performance measures. The Accounting Review, 75, 65-92. 15. Banker, R.D., Potter, G., and Schroeder, R.,(1993). Reporting Manufacturing Performance Measures to Workers: An Empirical Study 16. Behn, B. K., & Riley, R. A., Jr. (1999). Using nonfinancial information to predict financial performance: The case of the U.S 17. Berry, L.L. and A. Parasuraman (1991) Marketing Service—Competing Through Quality. New York: Free Press. 18. Cross, K. and Lynch, R.(1992).For Good Measure. CMA Magazine, April, pp. 20-23. 19. Eccles, R. G. (1991). The performance measurement manifesto. Harvard Business Re-view,69(2), 131-137. 20. Ehrbar, A. (1998). EVA: The real key to creating wealth. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.