Preview

Torts Case of Remoteness

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3411 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Torts Case of Remoteness
Overseas Tankship (U.K.) Limited v.The Miller Steamship Co. Pty. Limited and another (Wagon Mound No 2), Judicial Committee of the Privy Council on appeal from the Supreme Court of New South Wales, 1966

There are extracts from this case at p. 80 of Weinrib and then a summary of the result of this case at p 183. The case has some important passages beyond what appear in the p. 80 extract. Please add the following to your reading:

LORD REID, LORD MORRIS OF BORTH-Y-GEST, LORD PEARCE, LORD WILBERFORCE, LORD PEARSON
[Delivered by LORD REID]
This is an appeal from a judgment of Walsh J. dated 10th October 1963 in the Supreme Court of New South V/ales in commercial cases by which he awarded to the respondents sums of £80,000 and £1,000 in respect of damage from fire sustained by their vessels ."Corrimal " and" Audrey D" on 1st November 1951. These vessels were then at Sheerlegs Wharf, Morts Bay, in Sydney Harbour undergoing repairs. The appellant was charterer by demise of a vessel. the "Wagon Mound", which in the early hours of 30th October 1951 had been taking in bunkering oil from Caltex Wharf not far from Sheerlegs Wharf. By reason of carelessness of the "Wagon Mound" engineers a large quantity of this oil overflowed from the "Wagon Mound" on to the surface of the water. Some hours later much of the oil had drifted to and accumulated round Sheerlegs Wharf and the respondents' vessels. About 2 p.m. on 1st November this oil was set alight: the fire spread rapidly and caused extensive damage to the Wharf and to the respondents' vessels,
An action was raised against the present appellant by the owners of Sheerlegs Wharf on the ground of negligence. On appeal to the Board it was held that the plaintiffs were not entitled to recover on the ground that it was not foreseeable that such oil on the surface of the water could be set alight (Overseas Tankship (U.K.) Ltd. v. Morts Dock and Engineering Co. [1961] A.C. 388). Their Lordships will refer to this case as the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    W. R. Reilly Case

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ladies and Gentleman of the jury, W.R. Grace and Beatrice foods have polluted the aquifer located under East Woburn. There is no question of this, as testimony from workers such as Al Love show that they have spilled, poured and dumped TCE, or Trichloroethylene. Mr. Reilly testified that he should have known what was happening on the 15 acres of property he leased out to the Whitney barrel company. By dumping TCE and other chemicals onto the ground, these companies introduced these harmful substances into the environment, particularly the aquifer underneath. These chemicals are not industrial revolution chemicals; they are modern, harmful chemicals that have adverse health affects.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Legt 1710 Assignment 1

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The hearing of this case was held in the Court of Appeal of the New South Wales Supreme Court.…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sibler v Stacey s

    • 4506 Words
    • 13 Pages

    [Quicklaw note: Supplementary reasons for judgment were delivered December 19, 1985. See [1985] B.C.J. No. 3009.]…

    • 4506 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Amalgamated Society of Engineers v Adelaide Steamship Co Ltd (“Engineer’s Case”) (1920) 28 CLR 129 – Cth introduced industrial law – applied to state governments and entities within s51(xxxv) (arbitration power) as employers re industrial disputes. Said Cth could not make binding award over State governments. Abolished STATE RESERVED POWERS doctrine (that Cth could not intrude) – shifted balance of power to Commonwealth. High Court stated must look at words of constitution and give them their natural and ordinary meaning – no assumptions nor presumptions, give full effect, interpret grants generously, not restrictively. Federal overrules State. Melb Corp notes restrictions though……

    • 10129 Words
    • 41 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    [ 9 ]. Amalgamated Society of Engineers v Adelaide Steamship Co Ltd (“Engineers’ Case”) (1920) CLR 129, 145.…

    • 4001 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A2 OCR Law - Intention

    • 1888 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The facts of the case are that the appellants, who prior to the Lords’ judgement stood trial at the Court of Appeal of England and Wales under the watch of His Honour Judge Maher in 2001, were two boys aged 11 and 12 who went on a camping trip without their parents’ permission. Upon finding bundles of newspapers the boys set them alight and threw them under a wheelie bin, but did not extinguish the flame before departing, which consequently lead to a fire that spread to a second wheelie bin next to the wall of a Co-operative nearby, and damaged the shop and an adjacent building, causing approximately £1 million worth of damage. An indictment was brought against the appellants under section 1(1) and (3) of the Criminal Damage Act, which provides instruction on how to interpret recklessness. A conviction under these sections can find a person liable to imprisonment for life.…

    • 1888 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case List S2 2014

    • 1206 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Hide & Skin Trading Pty Ltd v Oceanic Meat Traders Ltd (1990) 20 NSWLR 310…

    • 1206 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    case of tort

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Brown is a farmer who, amongst other activities, has been in the business of raising chickens on large scale. The baby chicks require a continuous supply of a oxygen to survive and the necessary equipment for that purpose is connected to the electric power supplies to the farm. In thee past brown had suffered a minor loss of chickens from an interruption in this electric service and had, as a result, installed an auxiliary battery operated power generator in the barn to be available as an emergency back-up. He had taken further precaution of having a battery-operated power failure detector in his bedroom so that if the electrical power in the farmhouse failed, a warning signal would alert him to the potential danger of loss of electricity to his operation.…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    (source: Federal Court of Australia, Qantas Airway Ltd v Transport Workers’ Union of Australia (No 2) [2011], FCA 816)…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    tort law

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages

    3) How were the elements of intentional infliction of emotional distress applied to that case? In other words, explain why the court concluded that there was enough evidence to establish intentional…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Tort Law

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. Smiley, a buyer for Carrefour Fashions, entered the store of a rival firm, Boulevard Boutique, in order to find out what latest lines they were carrying. He was recognized by Maldini, the manager of Boulevard Boutique, who called the store detective, Rocco, and ordered him to “keep an eye” on Smiley while he, Maldini, called the police.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Unconscionability

    • 2687 Words
    • 11 Pages

    [ 6 ]. Cobbe v Yeoman 's Row Management Ltd [2008] 1 W.L.R. 1752 Lord Walker 92…

    • 2687 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Tort Law

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages

    If the defendant has duty of care to the plaintiff and breaches his duty of care, as long as it can be proved that the defendant’s careless conduct causes damage, injury or loss to the plaintiff while the damages are foreseeable, the defendant will be liable to negligence. The following shows why ABC ltd is negligent and therefore liable to Johnny and Kenneth.…

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Revolutionary war outline. I. Background and Causes of the Revolution A. Political Turmoil B. Taxation Without Representation II. Taxation and Acts of the British Government A. Navigation Acts B. Sugar, Currency, and Quartering Acts C. Stamp Act of 1765 D. Townsend Act of 1767 E. The Boston Massacre and the Tea Act F. Intolerable Acts of 1774 III. Major Political and Military Leaders A. American Political Leaders 1. George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams 2.…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bill of Lading

    • 2121 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Comparison of Hague Rules, Hague-Visby Rules, Hamburg Rules and Rotterdam Rules 1. Geographical scope of…

    • 2121 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics