Preview

Torts Cases and Digest

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
5739 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Torts Cases and Digest
SERGIO F. NAGUIAT, doing business under the name and style SERGIO F. NAGUIAT ENT., INC., & CLARK FIELD TAXI, INC., petitioners,
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION (THIRD DIVISION), NATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF WORKINGMEN and its members, LEONARDO T. GALANG, et al., respondents.

FACTS: Naguiat is the president and a stockholder of Clark Field Taxi, Inc. (CFT). Due to the phase-out of the US bases in the country, Clark Air Base was closed and the taxi drivers of CFTI were separated from service. The drivers filed a complaint for the payment of sep. pay due to the termination/phase-out. NLRC held Naguiat and the company solidarily liable for the payment of sep. pay.

ISSUE: WON Naguait should be held solidarily liable with CFTI. YES.
HELD: Under the Corporation Code, Naguait is liable bec: (1) he actively managed the business; (2) there was evidence that CFTI obtained reasonably adequate insurance; and (3) there was a corporate tort in this case.
Our jurisprudence is wanting to the definite scope of “corporate tort.” Essentially, “tort” consists in the violation of a right given or the omission of a duty imposed by law. Simply stated, it is a breach of legal duty.

PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK, petitioner, vs.
THE COURT OF APPEALS, RITA GUECO TAPNIO, CECILIO GUECO and THE PHILIPPINE AMERICAN GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., respondents.
Medina, Locsin, Coruña, & Sumbillo for petitioner.
Manuel Lim & Associates for private respondents.

Facts:
Rita Gueco Tapnio had an export sugar quota of 1,000 piculs for the agricultural year 1956-1957. Since, she did not need it, she agreed to allow Mr. Jacobo Tuazon to use the said quotafor consideration of 2,500. Her sugar cannot be exported without sugar quota allotments.Sometimes, however a planter harvests less sugar than her quota so her excess quota is usedby her mother who pays for it. This is her arrangement with Mr. Tuazon. At the time of theagreement, she was indebted to PNB of San Fernando, Pampanga.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Civil Litigation Unit 3

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS JUSTIN WILLIAM KING, ) ) Plaintiff. ) ) ) v. ) ) ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES, INC. ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) COMPLAINT Comes Now the plaintiff, Justin King, by and through his attorney, states as follows: PARTIES AND JURISDICTION 1. Plaintiff, for all times mentioned herein, was and is a resident of Cook County, State of Illinois. 2. Defendant is a corporation with its principal place of business in Missouri and carries on business in Illinois. 3. This court has subject matter jurisdiction over the claims presented in this complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 because plaintiff is a resident of Illinois and the defendant is a citizen of Missouri and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, exclusive of fees and costs. 4. Personal jurisdiction and venue are proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391 because the acts of defendant caused harm to plaintiff in Cook County, in United States Court for the Northern District of Illinois. COUNT I: ________ 5. On or about April 8, 2011, plaintiff Justin King, while in the exercise of due care, was operating his motorcycle on Interstate 57, heading in a south direction, in the City of Paxton, Illinois. 6. On the occasion in question, defendant, Frank Cuellar, a resident of Illinois, was operating a truck owned by Anheuser-Busch as its agent, and was traveling in a south direction on Interstate 57, so called, a public highway in the City of Paxton, Illinois. 7. On the occasion in question, plaintiff Justin King was traveling south on Interstate 57 in Paxton, IL on his motorcycle when he noticed a truck with Anheuser-Busch logo traveling behind him headed in the same direction. The plaintiff noticed Mr. Cuellar flashing his headlights requesting to pass the plaintiff and proceeded to switch lanes. Justin King then changed lanes to the right hand lane…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Commonwealth vs. Hunt

    • 2089 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Taylor, Benjamin, and Witney, Fred. U.S. Labor Relations Law. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1992.…

    • 2089 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Landrum Griffin Act

    • 2797 Words
    • 12 Pages

    3. National Labor Relations Board, (n.d.). The First Sixty Years. Retrieved 4 February 2011 from http://www.nlrb.gov/nlrb/shared_files/brochures/60yrs_26-30.pdfx.…

    • 2797 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    case of tort

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Brown is a farmer who, amongst other activities, has been in the business of raising chickens on large scale. The baby chicks require a continuous supply of a oxygen to survive and the necessary equipment for that purpose is connected to the electric power supplies to the farm. In thee past brown had suffered a minor loss of chickens from an interruption in this electric service and had, as a result, installed an auxiliary battery operated power generator in the barn to be available as an emergency back-up. He had taken further precaution of having a battery-operated power failure detector in his bedroom so that if the electrical power in the farmhouse failed, a warning signal would alert him to the potential danger of loss of electricity to his operation.…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yes, at the time of the accident Ferry was under the control of Nettie’s. There was sufficient evidence to determine that at the time of the accident Ferry was engaged primarily in advancing the business interests and was acting within the scope of his employment. Nettie’s had the right to control the manner in which Ferry performed his duties for which he was employed (Twomey, 2013, p. 621).…

    • 68 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Torts Study Guide

    • 4740 Words
    • 19 Pages

    Defendant’s actions were the proximate cause (nearest cause/ number of factors that collectively caused the Plaintiff’s injuries) or actual cause (specific factor that caused the Plaintiff’s injuries) of the harm to Plaintiff…

    • 4740 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Budd, J. W. (2013). Labor Relations: Striking a Balance (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.…

    • 1091 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Cornell university (2012). National labor relations act 1935, u. s. code: Title 29 section 157 . (2012). Legal Information Institute, Retrieved from http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/29/157…

    • 1864 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Torts Outline

    • 1819 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Battery is the (1) intentional infliction of (2) a harmful or offensive (3) contact. Offensive includes acts damaging to a “reasonable sense of dignity.” No knowledge of contact is required. (Rationale: protection of personal integrity. Freedom from intentional and unpermitted contact. Offensive harm included b/c of mental injuries).…

    • 1819 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Outline of Torts

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages

    3. Essence of battery is an offense to dignity involved in unpermitted invasion of inviolability of person…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Decline of the Union

    • 3539 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Budd, J. W. (2010). . In Labor Relations: Striking a Balance (p. 77). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Irwin.…

    • 3539 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Tort Law

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages

    If the defendant has duty of care to the plaintiff and breaches his duty of care, as long as it can be proved that the defendant’s careless conduct causes damage, injury or loss to the plaintiff while the damages are foreseeable, the defendant will be liable to negligence. The following shows why ABC ltd is negligent and therefore liable to Johnny and Kenneth.…

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Torts Went Wrong

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As we have already learned in class, a tort is a form of wrongful action that brings or causes harm to someone else that can lead to a lawsuit. Some torts are intentional, negligent, or strict liability. If you were intentionality trying to hurt someone or you were being reckless, you weren’t not making safe and conscious actions that only affect you. There are many different forms of intentional torts that are committed every day and there are consequences for those actions.…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    JACK NEIFT TRUCKING CASE

    • 5818 Words
    • 32 Pages

    Jack Neift Trucking is a small, privately held trucking business that is feeling the impact…

    • 5818 Words
    • 32 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Digested Cases in Criminal Law

    • 32847 Words
    • 132 Pages

    Insanity, under Article 12 of the Revised Penal Code, connotes that the accused must have been deprived completely of reason and freedom of the will at the time of the commission of the crime, or that he must have acted without the least discernment. Mere abnormality of the accused's mental faculties does not exclude imputability. (People v. Aquino G.R. No. 128887 January 20, 2000)…

    • 32847 Words
    • 132 Pages
    Powerful Essays