Preview

TORTS PRETEST

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
960 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
TORTS PRETEST
TORTS – PRETEST (5 points each)
Question 1 A HARMFUL OR OFFENSIVE CONTACT IS AN ELEMENT OF WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING TORTS? intentional infliction of emotional distress conversion BATTERY slander

Question 2
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES IN TORT ACTIONS COMMONLY INCLUDE ____. assumption of risk contributory negligence comparative negligence ALL OF THE ABOVE

Question 3
ASSAULT, BATTERY AND FALSE IMPRISONMENT ARE EXAMPLES OF ____ TORTS THAT INVOLVE INTERFERENCE WITH A PERSON'S BODY. INTENTIONAL toxic criminal negligent

Question 4
Bad Jim decides to break into Flora's house to steal her jewelry. Bad Jim slips on some spilled milk that was on Flora's kitchen floor and suffers a broken leg. Bad Jim wants to sue Flora for compensation for his injuries. Which of the following statements is (are) true? Jim will win his lawsuit if he can prove that Flora negligently left the milk on the floor for a considerable period of time. Jim will lose his lawsuit because a homeowner can never be liable to a trespasser. JIM WILL LOSE HIS LAWSUIT BECAUSE FLORA'S DUTY TO A TRESPASSER IS LESS THAN HER DUTY TO AN INVITEE. Both b and c.

Question 5
Brad owns a clothing store, Hollywood Rags. One day, while Jennifer is shopping at Hollywood Rags, she is approached by Angelina, the store security guard. Angelina calls Jennifer a thief in front of a group of other customers. Angelina then grabs Jennifer by the arm and drags her to the security office, where she is held against her will for several hours. When Brad and Angelina determine that Jennifer has not tried to steal any merchandise, they release her. Jennifer wants to sue Angelina, Brad and Hollywood Rags. What are her potential causes of action? assault and battery only assault, battery, and false imprisonment battery and false imprisonment ASSAULT, BATTERY, FALSE IMPRISONMENT, DEFAMATION

Question 6
Ray and his son, Jeff, are walking in the park. A stranger approaches Jeff in a hostile, aggressive manner. Ray

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the first trial, the court found the Garretts liable to the tenants for substantive and procedural unconscionability. Tenants maintained that the new rental prices placed by the owners were above the fair market value of the lots. Moreover, most of the unit homes in the property were virtually unmovable and after years of depreciation most of them were not accepted by other mobile home parks. Therefore, even if the tenants wanted to leave, that was not reasonably doable due to the age of the units which made almost impossible the option for the tenants to find substitutes unless they purchase new mobile homes. The court declared procedural unconscionability due to the unfair bargaining position of the Garrets with respect to the tenants, and substantive unconscionability because there was proof that the rent charged was above the fair market rental…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Kellys can get personal injury protection so they will pay for their medical bills and for their lost wages they may loss because of a incident 3. An Argument About the Value of…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pa201 Unit 3 Assignment

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Conclusion: It is not likely that Samantha will be awarded damages for her injuries because she cannot show proof that the grocery store had any knowledge of the hazardous spill on the…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Nolans requested that the Naabs remove the garage from their property. When the Naabs refused, a lawsuit ensued. Who Wins?? (Adverse Possession)…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Consequently, this means that the plaintiffs lost a 20 million dollar settlement deal for nothing. Ultimately, the plaintiff’s become desperate, they have no money and no way to pay of all of their debts. They end up settling on an 8 million dollar deal with Grace. “A settlement agreement has been reached between both parties. The exact conditions shall remain private between the parties involved” [1]. Accordingly, the plaintiff’s family would get 375 thousand each but with no apology and additionally, no clean up. Schlichtmann and his firm falls apart as they are all left with nothing but bankruptcy. Because of the plaintiff’s excessive settlement demands and gambling, they lose everything thanks to this case. Furthermore, Schlichtmann gives his files to the EPA, who end up ordering a 69.4 million dollar cleanup of the contaminated area. In which, Beatrice and Grace had to pay for. Ultimately, both the plaintiffs and defendants ended up paying more in the long run. Based on their principles in the beginning movie and if Jan did not have a change in heart it may have ended in the plaintiff's…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    july at the multiplex

    • 1380 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Legal: After analyzing both parties’ facts, there is a lack of fraudulent misrepresentation to follow suit. Therefore, Tommy has a weak standing.…

    • 1380 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    (TCO A, C) Jim worked for AAA Job Shop, Inc. for over 30 years. Two months before Jim retired, the head of human resources told Jim that the company would pay for health insurance for Jim and his wife for the remainder of his life, and for his wife’s life if she were to survive him, and handed Jim a letter from the company describing this. Jim had always known that the company provided this benefit to a few of its select employees. Jim didn’t really expect that he would receive it, although he had secretly hoped so for some time. Four years after retirement, Jim contracted cancer and incurred substantial medical bills under his insurance plan. Jim then received a letter from his former employer saying that the employer was discontinuing its payment of health insurance for those retirees who were receiving this benefit. Jim is considering suing the company to force it to live up to its agreement. Discuss the issues and likely resolution of Jim’s case.…

    • 3550 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Question A: Likelihood of Kimberly’s claim being successful: With the central issue in Kimberly’s circumstance of being physically and mentally impaired due to the shutters of the Bed & Breakfast house flying off and as a result, hitting the plaintiff (Kimberly), there is a high possibility that Kimberly’s claim will succeed. As a result of Elle being aware that months after the shutters were installed, she noticed splinters in the wood and damage in some of the shutters but took no precautionary measures to ensure that the risk of harm was eliminated, Kimberly’s claim of negligence on behalf of Elle is likely to be successful. With revelation to Elle’s failure to eliminate the risk of harm, Elle’s lack of action to take reasonable care has…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    dynamic business law

    • 761 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The appropriate legal issue in this case is to decide who, or whether anyone bears responsibility for the fall of the leaning tree. The plaintiff assumes that because Clark owns the property where the tree fell, that he is responsible for notification of its danger. Yet the plaintiff herself worked at Clark's house as a housekeeper and did not notify her husband of the danger of the leaning tree. This shows the flawed logic behind the plaintiff's argument that it takes one to spend time in that house to see the danger of the tree and to notify others about it. People do not have to be responsible for calculating the risks of leaning trees and no one should bear responsibility for Galindo's death. It is an accident that is beyond the human ability to prevent and the case should be dismissed.…

    • 761 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Verbermockle called her family doctor, she said, “My husband had a fall and he’s lying unconscious on the bathroom floor. I think he must have been taking a shower and slipped on a cake of soap.” However, the evidence is all wrong. If Mr. Vebermockle had slipped on a cake of soap, the soap would have slid across the floor, possibly to the other side of the bathroom. The soap is actually at the base of the shower. In addition, Mr. Verbermockle’s body would have fallen inside the shower, not in front of the sink. His body would be half inside the stall, half outside. Even if he had slipped forward while stepping out of the shower, his body would be face down. Also, Mrs. Verbermockle says that “he must have been taking a shower,” but the evidence shows that he hasn’t even been in the shower. We know this because he body isn’t wet, he has a toothbrush is in his hand, and his was completely dry. If he was in the shower at the time, then there would have been a mess of water on the floor. Instead, the evidence shows that he was brushing his teeth. This would support why his toothbrush was still in his hand. The evidence of the broken mouthwash bottle and the open tube of toothpaste support…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    You Decide, Week 5

    • 777 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Jimmy’s mother, John, and Jimmy’s Poor-Man’s Bar sued Software Inc. for the damage caused by Coleman. Coleman sued Software Inc. for wrongful termination and the jewelry store sued Software Inc. for the value of the ring.…

    • 777 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    You Decide

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Susie, Jerry and Katie drove around for about a half an hour without taking Susie home. Jerry made one stop which was located down the street where Susie lived, but Susie never got off on the first stop. At some point, Jerry lost control of the vehicle while making a left turn resulting in the truck turning over and seriously injuring Susie. After the incident Susie filed a complaint against the City of Elsewhere, Officer Ruthless, and other defendants, alleging that the City and the Police were negligent and therefore liable for her injuries. The main issue is to prove if the City and Officer Ruthless are liable for Susie’s injuries, due to the simple fact that Officer Ruthless ordered Susie Marks to ride in Jerry’s camper because of the park curfew time.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Adam decided to play a practical joke on Linda, a co-worker. As Linda was leaving the office one night, Adam, wearing a mask, stepped out from behind some bushes. He pointed a handgun made out of licorice at her and demanded her purse. He then pushed the candy gun to her head and told her if she told anybody he'd kill her. Linda was very scared during the whole incident. She did not think it was funny when Adam pulled the mask off and took a bite out of the gun as he gave her the purse back. Did Adam commit the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress? a…

    • 2540 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Business

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages

    References: Okrent, Kathy J. (2009). Tort and Personal Injury Law. Fourth Edition: Cengage Learning Inc.…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    tort law

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages

    3) How were the elements of intentional infliction of emotional distress applied to that case? In other words, explain why the court concluded that there was enough evidence to establish intentional…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics