My argument for this case is that the health care professionals (HCPs) should prioritize parent’s decision because, according to Harrison and others, a patient who is an infant has no capacity for any medical decision - making and a three month old infant has not developed language skills yet; therefore, HCPs should provide life sustaining treatment for the patient, include a nutrient injection to improve his health and immunity against illness, and perform intrusive heroic measures in a worst case scenario when his heart or breathing stops. Since the parents wish to provide “everything possible . . . to keep their baby alive” and there is no chance of cognitive recovery due to the permanent brain damage, the HCP can keep him in
My argument for this case is that the health care professionals (HCPs) should prioritize parent’s decision because, according to Harrison and others, a patient who is an infant has no capacity for any medical decision - making and a three month old infant has not developed language skills yet; therefore, HCPs should provide life sustaining treatment for the patient, include a nutrient injection to improve his health and immunity against illness, and perform intrusive heroic measures in a worst case scenario when his heart or breathing stops. Since the parents wish to provide “everything possible . . . to keep their baby alive” and there is no chance of cognitive recovery due to the permanent brain damage, the HCP can keep him in