TOYOTA PRODUCTION SYSTEM (TPS) The TPS model depends on its Human Infrastructure. The entire model is base on its PEOPLE & TEAMWORK being successful in doing their job and there buy in to the Key Elements of the TPS culture, which are as follows; Selection Ringi decision making Common Goals Cross-Trained TPS emphasize the point of its human infrastructure as a “COMMON GOAL” for all personnel in the corporation, which again is emphasize that its employees are its greatest assets as shown by the corporate slogan “GOOD THINKING, GOOD PRODUCT”. The “SELECTION” or hiring process is a very aggressive beginning in bringing on employees to ensure that TPS gets the right people who can be a team player. This was shown in the case study “……TMM initiated a hiring and training program (run out of a trailer office). It began with top managers and proceeded to core operations personnel;…
New United Motor Manufacturing Inc. (NUMMI), a Toyota – General Motors joint venture, took place in 1984. Generally, both companies had tangible objectives, on one hand, GM’s targets were reopening Fremont plant and learning how to produce a small, profitable car; on the other hands, Toyota’s aim was with GM’s help to launch a production line in the United States. However, the main strategy of the joint venture was learning. And ultimately, NUMMI became a desirable chance for GM to learn Toyota’s Production System (TPS) and for Toyota – an opportunity to…
As Toyota established itself in the US automotive industry, other players watched in admiration as Toyota plants around the world boasted consistent production of higher quality cars, fewer worker-hours, lower inventory, and fewer defects than any other competitor (Duvall, 2008). Many credited Toyota’s continued success and its ability to roll a new Camry, Avalon, or Solara off of the assembly line every 55 seconds to its application of its core competency, the Toyota Production System (TPS) (Duvall, 2008). Among the various characteristics of this system that made it a success were concepts such as just in time production, real time defect monitoring and correction, waste reduction, and other process knowledge that offered Toyota a sustainable competitive advantage. Toyota’s unrelenting approach in manufacturing was eventually recognized simply as “The Toyota Way”.…
The risk of entry by potential competitors in the automobile industry is weak because a substantial amount of capital is needed to begin an automobile company and to maintain it as well. Companies already in the automobile industry have an absolute cost advantage against potential new automobile producers. Toyota’s “lean production system” was an innovative process of producing vehicles in a cost effective manner without forgoing quality. The lean production system was imitated by America companies after 30 years of its existence. It is a superior production process that was not simple for an established company to imitate and would be exponentially harder for a new company to imitate.…
Toyota, on the other hand, applied mass production system differently in order to minimize the loss mentioned above. Firstly, auto parts were produced in small batches instead of a large amount on the purpose of reducing extra inventory costs. During this process, Toyota successfully reduced the stamping time from days to minutes, which increased the efficiency and decreased the manufacturing overhead. Also, due to the reduction in quantity, Toyota was able to expand their product diversity. Secondly, the labor division changed under this new manufacturing system. Workers were no longer responsible to a single task; they were asked to work together and seek out the errors during the production process. In that way, the inspection costs would be lower. The group work allowed workers to gain experience and skills; in other words, this is beneficial to the intangible assets of Toyota. Toyota’s manufacturing system is more cost-effective compared to the traditional one because with this system, Toyota managed to achieve high quality products with less…
At NUMMI, Toyota started by implementing a business strategy based on trust, respect, and teamwork, as opposite with the GM strategy based on high-tech solutions over worker initiatives, which ultimately conducted to mistrust and adversity between management and workers. The change at NUMMI emphasized “human development” and constant follow up on details as the key for continuous improvement and permanent strive to perfection. Continuous productivity improvement and quality become not only the center of the new system but also the responsibility of every worker. Starting from materials and components outsourcing, to transportation, tools and assembly, Toyota created an integrated system where the key for success was teamwork.…
Toyota’s innovation process in not the result of a few well-implemented initiatives, rather, it is a highly integrated system that constantly reinforces itself and is woven through the fabric of the entire organization. Many companies try to copy elements of Toyota’s Lean Product Development System (LPDS), but it is not that easy. All aspects of LPDS work together in harmony, and the process is reinforced by a culture that perpetuates it.…
1) How does the andon procedure work and what are its fundamental aspects? How much does it cost to stop the line? What are the benefits of stopping the line?…
Within the automobile industry, it is vital that companies adequately compete for consumer sales. With the industry struggling due to the current economic conditions, as well as a push for environmental sustainability, companies have to come up with new competitive strategies. There are 6 major ways that a company can give themselves an advantage over others. They are cost, quality, service, brand, innovation, and convenience. (McCrimmon, 2008) Three automotive companies are compared in terms of their strategies to compete against one another. Ford’s main strategy is on product development and efficient leadership. They use a low-cost strategy to help give a pricing advantage to consumers as well as centralized strategic leadership.(Hopkins, 2010) General Motors focuses on innovation of great quality products, and uses decentralized control in terms of making decisions.(Hopkins, 2010) Toyota’s strategy is in quality and product differentiation. This is obtained by focusing on the development of the process of building automobiles, rather then the development of automobiles themselves.(Hopkins, 2010)…
TOYOTA CASE STUDY Business Process Engineering And Viable System Diagnosis: Corporate Web Site Development (ISP Solutions PLC Case Study)…
The crisis: Toyota recalled a total of 8.8 million vehicles for safety defects, including a problem where the car's accelerator would jam, which caused multiple deaths.…
Consider this framework for Toyota Company as the objective of my analysis. Toyota's competitive strategy is to be reliable manufacturer of different models of quality cars. This strategy dictates that ideal supply chain for Toyota will concentrate in responsiveness but also should be efficient. Its supply chain consists of decentralized, but interlinked units that engage in local experimentation and actively pursue learning and resource transfer across units. Toyota effectively uses four supply chain drivers to show best performance. Later while analyzing each driver you will be able to see it.…
1. As Doug Friesen, what would you do to address the seat problem? Where would you focus your attention and solution efforts? What options exist that you would recommend? Why?…
2. In what ways is Toyota's manufacturing system designed to serve customers? There are a number of features in Toyota's manufacturing systems that are designed to serve customers, including the following features. Employees, even on the assembly line, are trained to consider their output as a product that should satisfy the next employee (the "customer") who receives it. If everyone in the company is satisfied with the quality of the work received from others, it is more likely that the ultimate consumer will be satisfied with the final product. Toyota's manufacturing system has close relationships with suppliers and demands high-quality products from them. Toyota is a very efficient company that keeps costs down and continuously strives to push cost down further…
This is commonly seen in the Thailand where the production of the cars are held. Suppliers would come from the multiple Small-Medium Enterprises around the country. This systems allows Toyota and the supplier to agree on long term issues and objectives and increase the effectiveness of the production and also strengthens the supplier’s competitiveness. The progress is regularly evaluate in terms of the organization, effort, and achievement and the assessment is communicated between the supplier and Toyota itself. If suppliers are unable to meet targets that Toyota wished they had, Toyota would provide various expertise to help to analyse and solve the issues faced. This help the supplier to improve their competitiveness and broadening their business opportunities as well as maintaining good relationships with Toyota. This helps Toyota to increase in their efficiency in the parts or materials needed for their production. With closer relationships they will be able to focus more on the production process and have lesser issues in terms of conflict between supplier and the company itself. Also, with most of the suppliers being a Small-Medium Enterprise most of them would be near the production plant of Toyota itself therefore enabling them to have a quicker delivery time and faster manufacturing services. With the combine efforts from both sides, they will be able to overcome multiple problems…