Preview

Trade Policy

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1215 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Trade Policy
2. Whose interests should be the paramount concern of government trade policy – the interests of producers (businesses and their employees) or those of consumers? Trade policy is a collection of rules and regulations when pertain to trade. Every nation has some form of trade policy, to help a nation’s international trade run more smoothly by setting clear standards and goals which can be understood by potential partner. Trade policy is a part of import and export taxes, tariffs, inspection regulations and quotas. The purpose of trade policy is to protect their local industries from heavy burden on importers and allowing domestics producers of goods and services to get ahead in the market with lower prices or more availability. Implementation on trade policy hurts the consumer more than the producers. It is because the consumers need to pay higher prices on the import products due to limits on the competition of foreign countries. Meanwhile, the producers win because they are getting more money for the higher price goods due to foreign competition. Globally, business win because of trade policy which controlled by government and more concerned on producer and not as much for the consumer. By establishing tariffs to protect the competition from foreign country will causes higher prices due to restriction. The importation items have a reverse effect on producing goods efficiently by a domestic business when tariffs are involved. For those countries receiving the importation items much costly compare to the country that exporting the items. For my point of view, the government should balance the policy on the interest of both businesses and consumers. Due to the economy is changing and the small business is very important for growing sector because it represents growing income for country economy. Thus, it will have an entirely different influence on building policy. Therefore, the government should continue to enforce policies that will protect businesses. So


References: Athukorala, Prema-Chandra (2005). Academic Journal article from ASEAN Economic Bulletin, Vol. 22, No. 1. Retrieved from http://www.questia.com/library/1G1-133572618/trade-policy-in-malaysia-liberalization-process#articleDetails Malaysia and the WTO (2007). Master Builder. Retrieved from http://www.mbam.org.my/mbam/images/@WTO%20%2870-77%29.pdf Malaysia Competition Comission (2012). Retrieved from http://www.mycc.gov.my/legislation.asp?page=policy

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The impact of an import tariff in a small nation is entirely unlike then an import tariff from a larger nation. When smaller nations imposes a tariff, it does not affect world prices, however the price of the importable commodity will start to rise, usually by the amount of the tariff for manufacturers and trade in the small nation. When large nations impose a tariff, it will reduce the volume of trade. Large nation tariffs also improve terms of the nation’s trade. Since the volume of trade is being reduced, it tends to lesson the nation’s welfare. However it also can improve the nation’s welfare. It depends on the welfare of the nation to if it actually rises or falls depending on the two conflicting forces.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    E. “If trade is good for a country, it must be good for everyone in the country.”…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    School Work

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages

    International Trade is important to many countries because it allows a country to import products or resources that may be difficult to produce locally. As a result, this enhances the country’s growth and economic wealth, and also allows the country to focus on increasing the production of resources or goods that the country can then export elsewhere. For…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Trade Embargo

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. The United States should end the Cuba embargo because its 50-year policy has failed to achieve its goals. Feb. 7, 2012 marked the 50th anniversary of the embargo, and the goal of forcing Cuba to adopt a representative democracy still has not been achieved. Fidel Castro resigned his presidency in 2008, and abdicated his role as the leader of Cuba's communist party in 2011 due to illness. His brother Raúl then stepped in to take his place. If 50 years of sanctions have not toppled the Castro regime, there is no reason to think the embargo will ever work.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Free Trade

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    By becoming involved in international trade all countries involved will be able to their products created at a cheaper price. For example if the US produces steel at a cheap rate and Korea produces televisions at a lower rate than the US, by participating in international trade manufacturing cost decrease…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This is a very interesting question. I would hope that the policies that are in place by the government would help not only the producers but in the long run would also help the consumers. The government has a responsibility to ensure that businesses will get that competitive advantage in the global business world. That said, if governments place were to place too much of its interest in businesses, the consumers would definitely suffer immensely. Historically, the United States has made many mistakes where we have protected the producers and companies and have developed many policies to ensure American companies do not fail. The book discusses the steel industry and how government placed an Ad Valorem Tariff on steel. It talked about how we wanted to protect domestic steel producers and how government had too many policies in place. That eventually was counterproductive and it raised the cost of production. This then caused the output to fail miserably and before we know it, we eliminated that tariff within two years. Can we learn from this mistake in the future? Sure we can. But you need the right people for the job. We need to make sure better policy-making decisions are made and that local content requirement is occurring.…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Economic Motives: for the protection of young industries from competition and the promotion of a strategic trade policy.…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Microeconomics Midterm #2

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The exam consists of multiple choice and multistep worked out problems. The time limit is 50…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    market, and to put “America first”. Many people are for the idea of increased trade barriers due to the fact that it will help urge more companies who leave the U.S., manufacture their products in countries where it is cheaper, and then sell their products back to the U.S., to instead stay in the U.S. and produce products domestically. Others argue that increasing these trade barriers will effectively hurt the U.S. economy, insisting that increased tariffs will increase prices of products, and hurt the wallets of the American consumer. Additionally, they argue that if the U.S. were to increase tariffs and barriers on other nations, those countries will turn around and increase their trade barriers, effectively hurting U.S. based organizations who export goods to foreign markets. I agree with the fact that trade barriers are coming down all over the world, but I feel the way in which barriers are set, and utilized by countries, must be done strategically, and with consumers in mind. It’s imperative to weight the positive outcomes with…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Bibliography: Athukorala, P., 2005, “Trade policy in Malaysia: liberalization process, structure of protection, and reform agenda”, ASEAN Economic Bulletin, Vol 22 No 1, pp. 19-34.…

    • 2903 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Free trade is a policy of imposing no restrictions on the movement of goods and services between countries. It will lead to the most efficient allocation of world resources and higher standards of living for all participating countries. Yet countries in the world see a need for protection. Protectionism is a policy of protecting home industries from foreign competition by the imposition of trade barriers on foreign goods and services. This is because individual governments in the countries are more concerned with achieving national objectives and improving the welfare of the people in their respective countries than with maximizing world output or increasing the welfare of the world.…

    • 1330 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    advantages. If the determination of international trade is to supply goods and services that we all demands, then I would have to assume that merely the purpose of government is to ensure that nothing interferes with the transaction between international producers and consumers. However, I do not agree with this information. My reasons are simply because some of the products we get from other countries are not safe. My second point of thinking is, companies that trade with them are often be able to hide details about how dangers or harmful their goods are from us; until the…

    • 271 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Philippine Sugar Industry

    • 3263 Words
    • 14 Pages

    The idea behind free trade is that it will lower prices for goods and services by promoting competition. Domestic producers will not longer be able to rely on government subsidies and other forms of assistance, including quotas which essentially force citizens to buy from domestic producers, while foreign companies can make inroads on new markets when barriers to trade are lifted. In addition to reducing prices, free trade is also supposed to encourage innovation, since competition between companies sparks a need to come up with innovative products and solutions to capture market share. But in reality this has made trade even more imbalanced because Third world countries have no protection against competition from foreign products from other countries especially industrialized nations such as the US and European States.…

    • 3263 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    free trade vs protection

    • 2380 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Tariffs are good for the domestic producers because their goods seem relatively cheaper with tariffs on foreign…

    • 2380 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    India: Foreign Trade PolicyAlthough India has steadily opened up its economy, its tariffs continue to be high when compared with other countries, and its investment norms are still restrictive. This leads some to see India as a ‘rapid globalizer’ while others still see it as a ‘highly protectionist’ economy.Till the early 1990s, India was a closed economy: average tariffs exceeded 200 percent, quantitative restrictions on imports were extensive, and there were stringent restrictions on foreign investment. The country began to cautiously reform in the 1990s, liberalizing only under conditions of extreme necessity. Since that time, trade reforms have produced remarkable results. India’s trade to GDP ratio has increased from 15 percent to 35 percent of GDP between 1990 and 2005, and the economy is now among the fastest growing in the world.Average non-agricultural tariffs have fallen below 15 percent, quantitative restrictions on imports have been eliminated, and foreign investments norms have been relaxed for a number of sectors.India however retains its right to protect when need arises. Agricultural tariffs average between 30-40 percent, anti-dumping measures have been liberally used to protect trade, and the country is among the few in the world that continue to ban foreign investment in retail trade. Although this policy has been somewhat relaxed recently, it remains considerably restrictive.Nonetheless, in recent years, the government’s stand on trade and investment policy has displayed a marked shift from protecting ‘producers’ to benefiting ‘consumers’. This is reflected in its Foreign Trade Policy for 2004/09 which states that, "For India to become a major player in world trade ...we have also to facilitate those imports which are…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays