trail of ghenus khan

In this trial of Mr. Genghis Khan (Johnny) vs. Mr. Genghis Khan not being civilized, I believe that the Mongol Warrior (Adam) helped bring out the fact that Mr. Khan was indeed innocent of this accusation. This Mongol warrior brought forth the fact that they did indeed give the civilizations a chance to surrender to the Mongols. The Mongol warrior also acknowledged the laws that Mr. Khan had made, (This was backed up by the Historian Juvaini (Rachel) and the research that was done by that person). He also brought forth the fact that, many people thought that there warfare, was part of being civilized, but when we asked the prosecuting witnesses, (the ones before the Mongol Warrior was called up), what the definition of being civilized was, many of the prosecuting witnesses did not involve warfare into their definition of being civilized. The Mongol warrior also helped us when the other prosecuting attorneys tried to ask him questions that were related to warfare, instead of being related to the main question, “is Mr. Khan civilized?”, we then brought them to a dead end, with us (the defensive attorney’s) putting objections towards their questions, because their question’s had nothing to do with the main topic of the trial. The prosecuting side then ran out of questions to ask, due to irrelevance of the questions that they were asking. On the opposing side, the Mustasim, caliph of Baghdad (Harrison) presented the most convincing evidence, to go against Mr. Genghis khan. This witness was a victim of the torment, this man was, I believe, rolled up in a carpet drug around beaten and trampled until dead. This man also had answers for most of our questions, and was ready for almost anything. In this simulation, I liked that we all worked together as a group, and we each had an important part in the trial. When we work as a group, the work seemed to go faster. For instance, my partner and I were both defensive attorney’s, and when it came to looking for questions