Hypothesis #1: By averaging muscle activations over all gait cycles for each trial, we cannot differentiate between patterns of muscle activity during transient responses and those observed during steady-state walking trials. We will use a system identification approach to derive muscle activation profiles for perturbed trials and repeat the analysis using steady-state averaging method and then compare the results to normal walking trials to demonstrate the differences. Statistical tests will be used to evaluate the significance of the difference between normal and perturbed walking for the two methods of analysis. We also compare the qualitative patterns of changes in steady-state walking to changes in transient
Hypothesis #1: By averaging muscle activations over all gait cycles for each trial, we cannot differentiate between patterns of muscle activity during transient responses and those observed during steady-state walking trials. We will use a system identification approach to derive muscle activation profiles for perturbed trials and repeat the analysis using steady-state averaging method and then compare the results to normal walking trials to demonstrate the differences. Statistical tests will be used to evaluate the significance of the difference between normal and perturbed walking for the two methods of analysis. We also compare the qualitative patterns of changes in steady-state walking to changes in transient