Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Transmile

Satisfactory Essays
444 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Transmile
-------------------------------------------------
SATURDAY, 29 OCTOBER 2011
-------------------------------------------------
Former Transmile directors sentenced to jail and fined
-------------------------------------------------

The Kuala Lumpur Sessions Court today found two former independent directors of Transmile Group Berhad guilty under section 122B(b)(bb) of the Securities Industry Act 1983, for having authorized the furnishing of a misleading statement to Bursa Malaysia in Transmile's 'Quarterly Report on Unaudited Consolidated Results for the Financial Year Ended 31 December 2006'.

The misleading statement was with respect to the unaudited revenue figures which were reported to the stock exchange for both the 4th quarter of 2006 as well as the cumulative period for 2006.

The directors, Jimmy Chin Kim Feung and Shukri Sheikh Abdul Tawab, were at the material time, in February 2007, members of the Audit Committee (AC) of Transmile and members of Transmile's Board of Directors. They were charged in 2007 and claimed trial. The trial commenced in 2010 and the Prosecution called 11 witnesses to prove the charge against both accused. Both accused gave sworn evidence in their defence.

In passing the sentence of one year imprisonment and a fine of RM300,000 (in default six months imprisonment), the Sessions Court Judge, Justice Dato' Jagjit Singh Bant Singh stated that the public interest factor must be given paramount consideration. He said that the Audit Committee is a vital organ of the company and particularly important in the corporate governance of a company.

The judge emphasised that the AC has specific duties, functions and responsibilities and that the investing public rely on them very much. He said that in this case the evidence showed a blatant disregard of the seriousness of the concerns on the contra transactions when the AC was told by Deloitte that the contra transactions were very unusual and lacked commercial justification. These, he said, were sufficient warning bells and as AC members they should have raised these issues to the board but instead failed to do so.

The case against two other former directors of Transmile Group namely Gan Boon Aun and Khiudin bin Mohammed, who were executive directors of Transmile at the material time, is currently pending in the Kuala Lumpur Sessions Court. The charges brought by the SC against Gan and Khiudin were also with respect to misleading statements made in the same quarterly statement which was submitted by Transmile to Bursa Malaysia in February 2007. Both accused had, on 22 March 2011, been called to enter their defence after the close of the prosecution case.

-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------
The difference original and the restated accounts for the year 2005 are as follows;

The original accounts:
-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------
The restated accounts:
-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------
Instructions:
-------------------------------------------------
Explore the issues and provide the recommendations for the identified issues.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Here, plaintiffs alleged that, “Defendants’ reckless stewardship of Veeco, particularly their failure to institute appropriate controls and oversight of all areas of the Company’s business, has exposed the Company to potentially significant fines and legal liability, has substantially impaired the Company’s market capitalization, has eroded the Company’s goodwill and trust in the market place, and has threatened the Company’s overseas sales” [pp. 274-275].…

    • 1598 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Tony Cupertino faces ethical and legal responsibilities as a CPA and CIA. Tony Cupertino must decide whether he report the concerns to the chief financial officer or the audit committee. As the CIA, Tony must uphold the values set forth in the IIA Code of Ethics. Tony must maintain his objectivity and independence from management. The audit committee is responsible for the oversight of the financial statements. As an internal auditor, Tony can address his concerns directly to the audit committee and the audit committee will resolve differences with management. Although Tony’s boss Walter is the chief financial officer and sits on the board of directors, Tony does have the option of reporting the issue to Walter. As a board member it is Walter’s responsibility to safeguard corporate assets and make decisions in the best interest of the shareholders. The…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Until the case of Ultramares Corp. v. Touche, auditors admitted no liability whatsoever to third parties. The judgment in Ultramares reaffirmed the principle that a fraudulent accountant, not a negligent one, would be liable to third parties misled by his or her statements. This case has had an impact on the work of auditors in terms of the care they exercise in preparing the auditor's report. Coercive forces compelled auditors to adopt behaviors to do what it takes to protect them from third-party liability by producing high-quality work.…

    • 2185 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sec's Rule 78j-1

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The financial reporting process needs oversight to function effectively. The audit committee is vital to that oversight process. While management is responsible for the daily operation of the company, the audit committee, in its oversight role, serves “as a check and balance on a company's financial reporting system” [SEC Release No. 33-8220 (4/25/2003)]. The audit committee helps to ensure that policies, procedures, and internal controls exist and are functioning properly within the risk parameters established. Duties encompass the independent review and oversight of the company's financial reporting processes, internal controls and independent auditors [SEC Release 33-8220].…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The proceedings was brought by ASIC (Australian Securities and Investments Commission) to against the director of JHIL for breach of the sections 180 (1) of the corporate act. According to allegations, each of director or officers of a corporation who failed to perform proper care and diligence about to release of announcement to the share market, breached the duties to the company.…

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jamaica Water Properties

    • 21349 Words
    • 86 Pages

    The case is about an accounting fraud that involves the Jamaica Water Properties, Inc. The fraud was characterized by misapplication of purchase method of accounting for acquisitions, recording fictitious assets, improper accounting for NOLCO, non-recording of appropriate allowances for uncollectible receivables, and misapplication of the percentage-of-completion method of accounting for long-term contracts. Ernest Grendi made the fraud possible, company CFO as helped by three senior accountants. These were aimed to inflate the price of the company stocks because of overstated earnings that caused them to receive sizable bonuses. However, JWP internal auditors just tolerated all of these because of their fear of being fired. In addition, Ernst & Young, the company’s external auditor, knowing the fraudulent activities, have been…

    • 21349 Words
    • 86 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ILAC corporations example

    • 960 Words
    • 3 Pages

    S.181 states, “Directors must exercise their powers and discharge their duties in good faith in the best interests of the corporation and for a proper purpose” (slides). In this case Patricia has failed to act in good faith of SEPL through advising her sister that SEPL are buying a large amount of shares in FPPL. Because of Patricia’s actions, SEPL lost their chance to buy shares at a lower cost, resulting in an additional cost to SEPL of $100,000. Patricia has not…

    • 960 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Discussion

    • 2337 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Public companies feel pressure to report quarterly earnings that meet or exceed analysts ' expectations-after all, failure to meet those expectations can hurt companies ' stock prices. This pressure can lead to practices that sometimes include fraudulent overstatement of quarterly revenue. Any of the improper and unusual revenue-transaction methods used to misstate quarterly revenue also can be used to change annual results. Auditors need to be alert to the whole gamut of warning signs that revenue-recognition fraud may be present.…

    • 2337 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Memo

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In conclusion, the error found on the 2011 ending inventory caused $1 million understatement on 2012’s reported income and is an error that needs to be corrected. If you have any further questions, feel free to contact me.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Charles Handy : organisation

    • 5104 Words
    • 21 Pages

    that the markets would eventually sort out the good from the bad and that, in due time,…

    • 5104 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Case 4.4 Waste Management

    • 3706 Words
    • 15 Pages

    The SEC now launched a formal investigation into the accounting processes and found many misstatements from avoiding depreciation to improper capitalization and failure to accrue to proper liabilities. Many techniques were used and the end result was that many of the management team’s members were named as defendants in this case as it was seen that they were…

    • 3706 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Board of Directors and Management team engaged in several conflict of interest actions. They were the first company to be charged under the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002; which holds financial executives more accountable by making them review and sign the financial statements. The SEC charged and found guilty, fifteen executives with accounting fraud they also admitted that they were a part of the fraud. If they had co-operated with the authorities the fraud would have been detected. Nobody wanted to decrease their wealth that occurred due to their unethical practices. According to (Lublin & Carms, 2003 para1) one of the directors, made a statement that they were not aware of what was going on. Their loss of accountability and transparency is obvious. They became oblivious to the fact that they were cheating investors of millions of dollars. Confusion is apparent because they did not know what was ethical anymore.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Paragraph 8 of AU section 561 states the auditor responsibilities for the two sets of circumstances.…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    While the real big problem is what the audit partner Thomas Trauger did. In order to make the workpapers appear as if the auditing teams had been ‘right on the mark’ all along, he modifying the workpapers and scour the evidences. Instead of scour the evidence, Trauger’s subordinate gave it to federal authorities.…

    • 342 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    FRAUD VS. ILLEGAL ACTS WHAT IS THE AUDITING DEFINITION OF FRAUD AND ILLEGAL ACTS? DEFINITIONS Fraud:  Fraud is an intentional act that results in a misstatement in financial statements that are the subject of an audit (AU-C 240.11) ILLEGAL ACTS:…

    • 893 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays