Preview

Trolley Drivers Deontology

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1690 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Trolley Drivers Deontology
Executive Summary
To determine the moral thing to do will depend on many factors. The society will dictate its moral values and the occasion. The action to be taken by a person depends on the occasion and the societal moral values. The age of a person, gender, and the expected responsibility are the things that determine the actions. One has to consider taking an action that will promote societal acceptance. The action should maintain self-respect of an individual in the society. When a person takes an action that keeps the moral values of his or society, there is an increase in the feeling of self-worth. The action on any occasion or situation should be of benefit and good to other members of your society. One may consider consulting the elders
…show more content…
It would be equally wrong from a moral situation to kill anyone. The trolley driver is affected by the deontologist theory. There is no moral reason for the deontologist to choose between the car and the bus because both are impermissible. However, there is no avoidance alternative for the deontologist to choose one option. The virtue ethics dictates the actions that should be taken to be ethically just. The theories of utilitarianism, deontology, ethical intuitionism and the virtue ethics advocate for the actions of an individual to be acceptable in the societal setting. The theories agree in the actions they advocate for to be right or wrong in the society. There is no point where the theories are in argument about the right or wrong actions an individual may take depending on the situation. No actions that may abuse the natural resources are considered morally upright by the traditional utilitarianism, deontology, intuitionism and the virtue ethics. It is through the traditional utilitarianism that one can have the moral values to observe the ecological ethics (Weinstein, 2007). The trolley driver situation can influence the decision made to take one of the options. There are several examples of the environmental situations that affect the decision of humans such as the deontologist situation of choosing between the bus and the car. The deontologist could not kill the homeless man or the …show more content…
The society will dictate its moral values and the occasion. The action to be taken by a person depends on the occasion and the societal moral values. The age of a person, gender, and the expected responsibility are the things that determine the actions. One has to consider taking an action that will promote societal acceptance. The action should maintain self-respect of an individual in the society. When a person takes an action that keeps the moral values of his or society, there is an increase in the feeling of self-worth. The action on any occasion or situation should be of benefit and good to other members of your society. One may consider consulting the elders in a case of self-doubt in the moral actions to take in a particular situation. You can take an action that violates the moral values of your society to save a situation. In the case of saving a situation, the consequences of an action by an individual are assumable. The assumption is easy when the action is of benefit to the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pt1420 Unit 6

    • 222 Words
    • 1 Page

    3. All citizens must make legitimate contributions to the society. Any citizen who is not contributing to the society shall pay a fine to the leaders at their discretion.…

    • 222 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Trolley Dilemma is a thought experiment where there is a runaway train and it is heading down the tracks towards five workers you cannot directly do anything to stop the train, but you happen to be standing by a lever that will switch the tracks, only problem is there one man on the other track. And by pulling the lever you will kill him only instead, so you kill one as an alternative to killing five. The other scenario is, imagine you are standing on a bridge seeing all of this happen and you by chance notice a very fat man standing on the bridge with you, he is leaning over the edge and you know that if you…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    We're all individuals who live in community. As we become adults, one of our primary responsibilities is to decide what values and ethical priorities are the most important to us. From the time we were born, our families, teachers/coaches, and other important adults in our world taught us what actions and behaviors we should embrace if we were going to be a "good" person. As adults, we have the responsibility to choose which of those values and behaviors to keep, which ones to modify, and which ones to discard.…

    • 1433 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this essay it is required to compare and contrast the similarities and the differences between three major ethical viewpoints or theories. The three that will be explained are virtue theory, utilitarianism and deontological ethics. Since its revival in the twentieth century, virtue ethics have been broadly termed for a theory that focuses on the role of character and virtue in moral judgment. Most virtue ethics theories take their inspiration from Aristotle who said that a virtuous person is anyone who has ideal or good character traits. This theory judges a person on their character rather than an action that at some times maybe different from their normal behavior.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Comparing and contrasting ethical theories helps one to understand ones guidance system which helps or aides one through their decision making process. “Each theory emphasizes different points such as predicting the outcome and following one's duties to others in order to reach an ethically correct decision.” (2011) Each theory has a familiar thread with an end goal. In this paper each of the following three ethical theories utilitarianism, Virtue, and Deontological will be described relating to ethics and morality. Concluding with a personal experience with which the relationship between virtue, values, and moral concepts as they relate to utilitarianism.…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Study Guide

    • 2694 Words
    • 11 Pages

    You should act in accordance with your human nature and with the natural laws of the universe…

    • 2694 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Doing the Right Thing

    • 3356 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Suppose you are the driver of a trolley car hurtling down the track at sixty miles an hour. Up ahead you see ve workers standing on the track, tools in hand. You try to stop, but you can’t. The brakes don’t work.You feel desperate, because you know that if you crash into these ve workers, they will all die. (Let’s assume you know that for sure.) Suddenly, you notice a side track, o to the right. There is a worker on that track, too, but only one.You realize that you can turn the trolley car onto the side track, killing the one worker, but sparing the ve. What should you do? Most people would say, “Turn! Tragic though it is to kill one innocent person, it’s even worse to kill ve.” Sacri cing one life in order to save ve does seem the right thing to do. Now consider another version of the trolley story. This time, you are not the driver but an onlooker, standing on a bridge overlooking the track. (This time, there is no side track.) Down the track comes a trolley, and at the end of the track are ve workers. Once again, the brakes don’t work. The trolley is about to crash into the ve workers. You feel helpless to avert this disaster—until you notice, standing next to you on the bridge, a very heavy man. You could push him o the…

    • 3356 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, in this paper I will discuss normative ethics and how people go about making hard decisions. I will explain to you what consequentialism and deontology are. I will also explain how our emotions play a role in our decisions to make consequentialist moral judgements and deontological moral judgements. Next, I will discuss how our emotions influence our decisions. Greene believe that we should not trust our deontological moral judgements. I agree with Greene and I will give examples and reasoning behind why I also do not think we should make deontological moral judgements.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Major ethical dilemmas require sound principles of moral understanding in order to act accordingly. Two major views on moral stance are the ethical principles of consequentialism and the commonly contrasted non-consequentialist view. This paper will try to present a fictional ethical dilemma which stresses these two major views and exposes the strengths and weaknesses of both views. The “Trolley Problem” is a short video published by BBCradiofour which depicts an ethical dilemma with three possible outcomes (BBCradiofour).…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethics

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In reading the Ethics problem box regarding the Trolley Problem I will attempt to answer the question of would I throw the switch. I have had the chance to research different profiles to try and answer this question.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The trolley problem as first constructed by Phillipa Foot presents a moral dilemma in which one has to place value on what is more important and what is morally right. In this situation, there is a runaway trolley barreling down the train tracks. Ahead, on the tracks, there are five people tied up and unable to move. The trolley is headed straight for them. You are standing some distance off in the train yard, next to a leaver. If you pull this lever, the trolley will switch to a different set of tracks. However, you notice that there is one person on the side track. There are two options given; 1) do nothing, and the trolley kills the five people on the main track. 2) Pull the lever, diverting the trolley onto the side…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Personal Responsibility

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In this paper, the author defends a view according to which one is responsible for one 's actions to the extent that one has the ability to do the right thing for the right reasons.…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Then a has to decide to take that action, not because they are forced to or because it’s a habit, but because they chose to. If you accidentally help someone your actions would not be considered virtuous because you didn’t intend for them to be helpful, the action should be made because it is honestly what you believe is right. A person tends to do the right thing when others are watching, but for their action to be considered truly virtuous they would do the same when no one is looking. To truly be able to do a virtuous and selfless act it must be at the root of a person character, and a person’s character is based upon a person’s actions and not there emotions. We do good not because it always makes us feel good, but because we are taught that it is good.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trying to make the decision, that only killing one is okay because five people walked away from it. About the obesity man, the only thing is there is no way on putting someone else lives in front of anybody else’s, that is the problem of putting him in the front of the trolley. Who gets to have the final word, who is more important then who? It is hard to make a decision that makes everyone happy, in any situation in the world. With every situation, there are so many outcomes, there is no way that everyone can stay happy threw the whole thing.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The task that stands before me in this paper is to address two situations and determine the ethical parameters in which a person should act. The two philosophical approaches that I will examine the situations with the Kantian and Utilitarian point of view. Kant deciphers his ethical questions by examining a person's motivation for performing an act regardless of the consequences. A person who utilizes the Kantian view believes that the only pure good is pure human reason without consequences. This pure human reason works without the influence of human emotions and desires. A truly good act as defined by Kant is performed because of an obligation to the categorical imperative. The objectives and personal agendas of the individual performing the act must kept separate and distinct. Utilitarism makes ethical decisions based on the consequences of the action taken. Unlike the Kantian view the motives are not important just the consequences. The action is measured by how much happiness or sadness the action creates. The ideal ethical decision is the one that creates the most happiness and the least amount of sadness. It nearly impossible to have different degrees of freedom since a person would have to experience all the various degrees of freedom to determine what degree of happiness is better than the other. Upon examining the thief who stole from the millionaire Kant would examine the motives of the thief. The thief is stealing for himself regardless of his situation. Even if his family is poor and struggling. The thief is still furthering himself. The reasons for the thief stealing from the wealthy man doesn't matter. Stealing is against the universal law that it is wrong to steal from another person. This applies to everyday life and decision-making occurrences, needs and wants are thrown out the window. Any form of stealing is wrong according to Kant. This is a strong argument because it stands firm in that it is wrong to steal. We are in a society that has laws…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays