true education should do

Reaction: studying in the slow lane After I read Anna Mitchell article “studying in the slow lane” the idea of “slow schools” is kind of similar to me as Sidney Harris article “What True Education should do”. In Harris article he describe the mean of true education that instead of stuffing information or knowledge try to draw it out or bring it out what student got inside of them. In Anna Mitchell article “fast schooling methods” is kind of same as stuffing information or knowledge inside you without drawing it out. In fast schools methods they give lot of homework but they don’t give much time to think about it, it’s like the same as stuffing information or knowledge into student mind. But slow school methods are kind of like same as what Harris describes in his article about true education should be. In slow school they try to make student understand what they are doing step by step and they give them more time to think and they help them to come out with their own idea and that make them more interested on study. That’s what Harris minted on his article about true education, true education is not stuffing information or knowledge into a student, its make them interested and help them to draw out what they have inside them. In my opinion I think Ann Cassidy’s grade 5-6 classes were getting the “slow schooling methods” and they were getting the right education what Harris describe on his article . Those Ann Cassidy’s grade 5-6 student they were drawing out what they got on they are mind and it seem that they having lot of fun while they were learning. That’s what Harris describe on his article that teacher shouldn’t be stuffing knowledge in their mind they should help them to

bring it out their own idea. And Ann Cassidy’s student wasn’t stuffing knowledge they was drawing out what they got on their mind. “Slow schooling methods” help those students to understand what they learning and they having fun were learning that’s why