Except for republicanism, all these had actually firm Ottoman roots, not in form of doctrine or principle but as characteristics of the modernization process, and as a part of the Ottoman polity14. Secularization/laicization was one of the essential characteristics of the Ottoman modernization since, roughly to say, the second half of the nineteenth century; early writings on the history of the Turks began at the same time and by the end of the century, Turkism, then denoting Turkish nationalism, became one of the cornerstones of political thought among intellectuals. Populism was one of the components of the ideology of the Committee of Union and Progress, which was the party in power in between 1908-18. Etatism emerged as practical and pragmatic economic policy during the First World War. That is to say, Mustafa Kemal was not the creator of these principles; instead, he was the political leader that systemized them as a political program tobe implemented for the transformation of Turkey into a modern state. Nevertheless, he and the bureaucratic elite surrounding him presented them as novelty through which the state and nation would catch up the contemporary and
Except for republicanism, all these had actually firm Ottoman roots, not in form of doctrine or principle but as characteristics of the modernization process, and as a part of the Ottoman polity14. Secularization/laicization was one of the essential characteristics of the Ottoman modernization since, roughly to say, the second half of the nineteenth century; early writings on the history of the Turks began at the same time and by the end of the century, Turkism, then denoting Turkish nationalism, became one of the cornerstones of political thought among intellectuals. Populism was one of the components of the ideology of the Committee of Union and Progress, which was the party in power in between 1908-18. Etatism emerged as practical and pragmatic economic policy during the First World War. That is to say, Mustafa Kemal was not the creator of these principles; instead, he was the political leader that systemized them as a political program tobe implemented for the transformation of Turkey into a modern state. Nevertheless, he and the bureaucratic elite surrounding him presented them as novelty through which the state and nation would catch up the contemporary and