Twelve Angry Men Analysis

In the movie twelve angry man, after the twelve jurors listened to the facts in the trail, the judge gives her instructions to them. The judge told them that the man could face the death penalty if he found guilty. The 12 man gather in a stifling hot room to have a concluding about the case. They start arguing and adding their own experience, culture, and understanding of people's motives as a way of reconsidering the facts. Although all the jurors had listened to the same stated facts and they were in the same situation, each one of them interprets the facts differently. This reflects the differences in people and the different ways that we view the same things. The first Juror to votes not guilty in the initial vote is the old white man who works as an architect. As when sitting on his office and drawing blueprints for constructing a building, He was very quiet and respectful in the room. He wasn’t convinced that the boy is innocent, but he wants to compare what’s really happened with the testimony’s evidence. At the end of the film he introduces himself to one of the jurors as Davis. He is free of prejudice, and he believes in justice for all. Although in his job he can be sure about the construction material and similar things,
He is a small business owner, which is running messages service. He proudly says that he started his business from scratch and now employs thirty-four workers. He makes his decision based on the fact of his bad relationship with his son. He didn’t speak with him since two years. Although it may not be through the facts of the case, but he is convinced that the defendant is guilty. Actually, he changes his mind once he realizes that he is reflecting his feelings about his own son onto the defendant. At the end of the movie, he loses control of his emotions, and he reveals that his relationship with his own son has biased his