Preview

Twelve Angry Men By Reginald Rose

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
595 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Twelve Angry Men By Reginald Rose
I have recently read Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose and decided to write a letter based on your behavior in the jury. I’ll start my letter with your personal life, you started your business from scratch and now you have thirty-four employees working for you. How do you treat your worker: do you treat them with respect? By the way you were behaving in the jury, it seems like you disrespect your employees. You might be wondering why I called you a disrespectful person? On page 26, when all of the jurors who believes that the boy is guilty decided to take a secret ballot to see if everyone remains on their side, if anyone change their side then this jury will continue. As a result, one of the juror changed his vote. You asserted, “What …show more content…
(Brother, you’re really something! You come in here and voted guilty… preacher over here starts to tear your heart out with stories.” This illustrates that you’re trying to prove that everyone has to be loyal to their side; unfortunately, you’re wrong sir. In jury, everyone has the right to change their verdict, so you do not have the right to shout at someone for what they believe in because, like you, they also have the right to express their opinions. Although you were yelling at 5th juror for changing his side, actually 9th juror changed his side. You were accusing someone else for changing his vote when he didn’t change his vote. There is a phrase, “Get your facts straight.” This means have the correct information before you criticize someone. I also remember once my high school Health teacher told me, “Think twice before you do something.” This means think deeper of what you’re going to do because sometimes your action might affect others negatively. Another example of how uncontrollable you were in the jury room is when you started playing tic-tac-toe with the 12th juror and when the 8th juror snatched the pad, you irritatedly said “Did you see him? The Nerve! The absolute nerve!” (P. 32). This shows that when someone object your action, you get

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In a crowded jury room, opinions collide as discussions about the innocence of a young boy are decided. The dark and foreboding storm clouds that hang over the heads of the jurors are beginning to lift as time progresses and new facts are presented. The two men that cannot put their personal emotions aside are juror 3 and juror 10. These men are motivated by their emotions rather than the evidence.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eyewitness In 12 Angry Men

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The film 12 Angry Men is about a murder trial conducted in a courtroom. The judge gave the jury its final instruction telling them that a guilty verdict will result in a death sentence for the defendant, an 18-year-old boy who was accused of murdering his father using a knife! One juror had a personal connection with the case. He has not seen his son for more than two years. He claims that the young boy is guilty and that all young kids are criminals. The juror has bias towards the trial because he see his son in the young boy. Out of the twelve jurors, eleven jurors voted for conviction. Another juror states that he has doubts about the case and hopes to give the boy a favorable decision. The young boy had a hard life living in the slum. A third juror claims that each of the…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the drama Twelve Angry Men, by Reginald Rose, there are twelve jurors to discuss and deliberate if the murder in the first degree is guilt or not. Because the verdict must be unanimous, twelve jurors have a critical thinking in their discussion and finally made the vote from eleven jurors vote for guilty to unanimous vote for not guilty. During the development of the voting, Juror Three is hardly to persuade because he has a serious prejudice to the murder. If Juror Three does not admit the murder is not guilty, they cannot settle a lawsuit. Therefore, Juror Three’s prejudice should be the key to get the final verdict.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jury and Angriest Juror

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Juror #Eight Also insists that, “during the trial, too many questions were left unasked”. “He asks for the murder weapon to be brought in” and says that “it is possible that someone else stabbed the boy’s father…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In today’s fast-paced world we often find ourselves making hasty, split-second decisions on the seemingly unimportant matters with which we are faced. According to The Critical Thinking Handbook “...critical thinking evaluates reasons and brings thought in line with...” our best sense of what is true enabling us come to insightful conclusions on which we base our actions. In Twelve Angry Men a group of twelve ordinary citizens are faced with an important choice whose consequence is the fate of a sixteen-year-old boy accused of killing his father. Initially deemed an open-shut-case, throughout the play we witness the jurors, under the direction of Juror 8, slowly break down the evidence and testimony on which they later base their final verdict. Each juror with his unique approach to reasoning raises important arguments, suggesting both the innocence and guilt of the accused and further adding to the complexity of the case. In Twelve Angry Men, three pieces of evidence that proved crucial in shifting the jury in favor of acquittal were the murder weapon, the old man’s testimony, and that of the woman who claimed to have seen the murder from across the street.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    12 Angry Men

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Juror #3 came into this trial with a moral dilemma long before hearing the facts of the case. Given his past experiences, he would feel more inclined to vote guilty as to punish and make an example of this boy so that other kids would think twice. In this case if the jury decided on a guilty verdict, the defendant would be put to death. People might make rash decisions based…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the outset, eleven jurors vote in favor of convicting the accused without even discussing a single shred of the evidence presented at trial. Only one brave juror refuses to vote. He openly admits that he does not know whether the accused is guilty or innocent and that he finds it necessary to simply talk about the case. What follows is not only a discussion of the particular facts of the case, but an intense examination of the personal baggage that each jury member brings to the room.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The setting of Twelve Angry Men, by Reginald Rose, affects all of the character’s emotions and the overall mood of the play. There are two parts of the setting that affect the mood: the weather and the room. The weather seems to mimic the overall atmosphere of the jury room, as well as the jurors’ moods. It is a very hot summer day, so the jurors feel very warm and uncomfortable, which can cause them to be unruly. The room and its environment have an effect on how everyone is feeling as well.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * With one voting not guilty, the group wanted to discuss why he voted “not guilty”. The dynamics in a few members in the group became irritable due to his vote; which prolonged the voting process. With the rise of conflict, the jury needed to come up with a decision. In order to come up with their decision, they were to influence and cross referenced their facts. They discussed why they thought the man was guilty and not guilty. Based on the conflict cycle, the jury has reached the first stage of conflict, escalation.…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men: Summary

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The movie “12 Angry Men” focuses on a jury's deliberations in a capital murder case. The jury is sent to begin deliberations in the first-degree murder trial of an 18-year-old boy from the slums accused of stabbing and killing his father. If the boy is found guilty, he will be sentenced to death by electrocution. The case appears to be open and shut. The defendant has a weak alibi. A knife he claimed to have lost is the murder weapon found at the scene. Also, he claimed to be at the movies, but couldn’t recall what movies he’d seen or the actors who played in them. There were several witnesses who either heard screaming, saw the boy fleeing the scene, or witnessed the killing. Eleven of the jurors immediately cast guilty in a preliminary vote; only Juror No. 8, Mr. Davis, casts a not guilty vote. At first Mr. Davis' bases his vote on the need to simply discuss the case further. He feels that they should take their time and discuss the case since a young boy’s life is at stake. All jurors must believe beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty before hastily making a decision. As the deliberations begin, the story quickly becomes a study of the jurors' personalities, ranging from quiet and shy to arrogant and merciless. In the end, Mr. Davis provides enough reasonable doubt to all the evidence provided to convince the eleven jurors that a verdict of not guilty should be given to the defendant.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    12 Angry Men Jury System

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The extensive timeframe of the unanimous jury system, allowed the evidence presented in the courtroom to be thoroughly examined, especially as the defence attorney appeared less than proactive. To start, the testimony of the knife presented in court was disproved in the jury room as an identical knife was revealed by Juror Eight. Thus it became apparent it would have been “coincidence for another person to have stabbed the father with the same kind of knife” (p.17) that resulted in a change in Juror Nines’ vote. Similarly, Juror Eight raised another statement regarding the time it took the old male witness to reach his door and see the boy, posing a doubt in the jurors’ minds, as “it’s a long walk….for an old man who had a stroke” (p.34) which modified the votes of Juror Two and Six. Correspondingly, most jurors immediately started to rethink their votes as the evidence was slowly examined in depth. Allowing the evidence to digest and the vote count to change from “11 to 1- guilty” (p.7) to reach a verdict…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sidney Lumet, director of 12 Angry Men, did a phenomenal job expressing the depiction of an adaptation of the theatre production. A 12- man jury are sent into a room to discuss the topics laid out in court, referring to a young, Puerto Rican, man supposedly killing his father. The defendant’s alibi is weak, and the murder weapon was found at the scene. Several witnesses have seen the defendant fleeing the scene. On this excruciating hot day, the men begin laying down the law, and looking at the evidence laid out in front of them. Out of the twelve jurors, eleven voted guilty, one voted not guilty. Juror number eight, Mr. Davis, cast the vote so the discussion of the night of the murder would continue to flow. The case was an “open-closed” case,…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Introduction In the book Young Men and Fire By Norman Maclean,He explains how fires effects the smokejumpers and him. The story illustrates how fire acts and how to control it. Also the personality they have to maintain as a smokejumper or ground crew. And what it takes to be a firefighter in any region.…

    • 1531 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    OB 12 Angry Men

    • 718 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The 8th Juror : Is the first to vote not guilty, he does not call the boy guilty but says that it’s not right to take a verdict in the first 5 mins. They show him to have a different character by him not responding to questions, looking out of the window.…

    • 718 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In this section, the play begins to divide its jurors into three categories. First, 8th Juror stands alone as fighting for the boy. Now, one may include 9th Juror in this, as he does quickly become an advocate for the boy, after hearing a few of 8th Juror's arguments. Second, there are jurors who do presume the…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics