Preview

Twelve Angry Men: The United States Judicial System

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
521 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Twelve Angry Men: The United States Judicial System
The film Twelve Angry Men suggest that The United States Judicial system is very unfair to the person being tried.In this trial, the defendant is being tried for killing his father. Some of the men in the jury are chosen very poorly. One example of them being chosen poorly is their past clouds their judgment. Juror number three had a bad past with his son which lead him to believe that all children are ungrateful and useless. “You're right. It's the kids. The way they are you know? They don't listen. I've got a kid. When he was 8 years old, he ran away from a fight. I saw him. I was so ashamed I told him right out “I'm going to make a man out of you or I'm going to have to bust you up into little pieces trying.” When he was 15 he hit me in the face. He's big, you know. I haven't seen him in three years. Rotten kid! You work your heart out.... All right let's get on with it.” This is unfair to the defendant because he's now seen as ungrateful and rotten to juror number three even before the case. The US should look …show more content…
“I don't mind telling you this, Mister. We don't owe him a thing. He got a fair trial, didn't he? You know what the trial cost? He's lucky he got it. Look we're all grown-ups here. You're not going to tell us that we're supposed to believe him knowing what he is. I've lived among’em all my life. You can't believe a word they say. You know that.” He sees anyone that is a slum as in lying menaces that can't be trusted. So because of where the boy was brought up, he was already liar to number ten. Which is unfair because he never even had a chance.

This is why the film Twelve Angry Men suggest that The United States Judicial system is very unfair to the person being tried because they don't check into the juror members enough which can lead to a very unfair jury
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Summary Of Judicial Tyranny The New Kings Of America
    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Summary Of Judicial Tyranny The New Kings Of America

    Sutherland, M. (2005). Judicial Tyranny: The New Kings of America. St. Louis, MO: The National Policy Center. ISBN: 9780975345566…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Benforado's Un Fair 'What We Must Overcome'
    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Benforado's Un Fair 'What We Must Overcome'

    In chapter 11 of Unfair “What We Must Overcome” our author tackles on three serious challenges we face in realizing science-based reforms. First, he addresses the approach our justice system has towards juror screenings and exactly how we are getting it wrong. Benforado suggest that these juror screening are intended to eliminate those people who cannot be fair if selected to be a jury in a criminal case. While we purpose to address this bias, our author suggest that we are instead,” reinforcing a false narrative oh what bias is, where it comes from and how it can be remedied. “(P.g. 240) Consequently, Benforado offers us an experience of his own with the juror selection process, which he and other jurors filled out a questionnaire. Moreover, if you indicated that you are more likely to the believe the testimony of a police officer, over the testimony of a normal person all you received was speech on why it was wrong. The judge would explain to you that” your job as a juror required you to treat every witness the same regardless of his or her position, race, gender or the like. (P.g.240) After…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Courtroom Workgroup Paper: American Criminal Justice System
    • 1388 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Courtroom Workgroup Paper: American Criminal Justice System

    The American Criminal Justice System is a well orchestrated and cooperative performance with the professional courtroom actors and others all playing their parts in the administration of justice. This paper will look at a very important group of individuals the courtroom work group. Each person acts as one of the cogs in the machine, all cooperating to reach a common goal. This paper will describe what a courtroom work group is, who is in a courtroom work group and what they each do. The role of the prosecutor will also be described and how they determine which cases to pursue, and what would happen if the criteria for the prosecution of cases were more lenient or stringent. Lastly, this paper will describe the effects of the criminal justice funnel and the backlog of cases on the American court systems and the courtroom work group. Are there any solutions to help eliminate the funnel and help reduce the backlog of cases? To get an answer to that question, a review of the how this important group works will have to be understood.…

    • 1388 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rich Vs. Poor: The American Judicial System
    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Rich Vs. Poor: The American Judicial System

    “Where justice is denied, where poverty is enforced, where ignorance prevails, and where any one class is made to feel that society is an organized conspiracy to oppress rob and degrade them, neither persons nor property will be safe”(Douglas). The American judicial system which has undergone many changes since its colonial times has evolved with the changing times to reflect a modern society, however even with the changes that the judicial system has undergone it still faces a key critical point that continues to undermine the laws and justices from which our society is based. The glaring point is the differentiating treatment between the rich and the poor. In the judicial system the rich are given substantial leniency with corresponding…

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    PSY328 final proposal
    • 1936 Words
    • 6 Pages

    PSY328 final proposal

    Juries represent the ordinary public and therefore are more likely to judge in line with generally accepted values of the society. Justice and equity are the standards of an eligible jury, and the jury selection is meant to ensure “counterbalancing of biases” or canceling out individual biases (Hastie, Penrod & Pennington, 1983). However, jury trials are often vulnerable to the effects of prejudice and stereotypes of the jury, by geographical or historical factors, and it tend to be harmful to certain groups. For example, juror characteristics, such as gender, religion, education level, socio-economic status (Hastie et al., 1983; Wrighstman, Kassim & Willis, 1987), and racial prejudices (Urszbat, 2005). And attorneys’ intonation, posture, attractiveness, confidence, and credibility also affect juries’ perception and their judgments (Jakubaszek, 2014). Most significant, the characteristics of defendants like gender and age would affect jury decision making (Pazzulo, Dempsey, Meader & Allen, 2010). These prejudices and stereotypes cause in-group-out-group bias during the trial process. In-group bias means in-group favoritism that refers to the fact that under certain conditions people will preference and have an affinity for one’s in-group over the out-group, or anyone viewed as outside the in-group. It is usually expressed in one 's evaluation of others, linking, allocation of resources and many other ways (Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D. & Akert, R. D., 2009). And out-group bias is the phenomenon in which an out-group is perceived as being threatening to the members of an in-group ( Hewstone, M.; Rubin, M.; Willis, H., 2002) defined as out-group derogation. It is a matter of favoritism towards an in-group and the absence of equivalent favoritism towards an out-group (Brewers, Marilynn B., 1999). Outgroup derogation often…

    • 1936 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Kenneth A. Strike: Using Due Process For Cases Of Punishment
    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kenneth A. Strike: Using Due Process For Cases Of Punishment

    The idea in this assignment that seems useful to me is the explanation Kenneth A. Strike gives about using due process for cases of punishment. In The Ethics of Teaching, Kenneth A. Strike explains “ If we are to decide about the kinds of due process to provide in cases of punishment, we must have some idea of what the desirable consequences of punishment are” ( Strike, pg. 29). This statement means that when it comes to punishments we must think about the consequences that may occur. For example, in the case study example, Mr. Fuse chose to punish Alex because someone in the class wrote a note to Mr. Fuse telling him that Alex was the one who exploded the object in the classroom. Alex didn’t admit to exploding the object so there really isn’t…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Judicial Branch Research Paper
    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Judicial Branch Research Paper

    The Judicial Branch is made up of courts. Those courts are the Supreme Court, Circuit Courts and District Court. There are no qualifications for becoming a federal judge. The constitution sets no qualifications but Congress and the departments of justice have their own criteria. The United States Senate has to approve all presidential appointments to the Supreme Court. This is an example of the United States using…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Judicial Branch Research Paper
    • 1614 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Judicial Branch Research Paper

    The Judicial Branch is the most important branch of the United States government, due to the significant role it plays in interpreting and determining if laws are constitutional. Even though the Judicial Branch is the smallest in size and has smallest budget of any branch in our nation’s government, it exercises enormous power and is equal to other branches of the government because it has the power of Judicial Review. Judicial Review is the review by the US Supreme Court of the constitutional validity of a legislative act.…

    • 1614 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    History And Purpose: American Criminal Court System
    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages

    History And Purpose: American Criminal Court System

    The American criminal court system plays a major role in our country. Without this system, all of those who violate the law would be entitled to do whatever they want and not held accountable for their actions. Defining the court and its purpose it’s something that will makes us understand the system a little better. The dual court system, also plays a major role in our countries system and will be defined in this paper. Describing the role that early legal codes, the common law, and precedent played in the development of courts will also be defined in depth…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The National Judiciary: Questions and Answers
    • 250 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The National Judiciary: Questions and Answers

    Presidents tend to choose judges from their own political party because judges may serve for…

    • 250 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Judicial Branch In The 20th Century
    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Judicial Branch In The 20th Century

    "[The Judicial Branch] may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment” Hamilton explained when analyzing the Judiciary’s initial intent. Article 3 section 1 of the Constitution grants the Supreme court “The judicial Power of the United States.” this power can be given to inferior courts such as circuit and district courts as “Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.” Later, in article 3 section 2, the Judicial branch is granted power that “extend[s] to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority.” The Judicial branch has explicit power to interpret the intent of past laws, treaties made, and…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Flaws In The American Criminal Justice System
    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Flaws In The American Criminal Justice System

    During the 20th century, the American criminal justice system greatly advanced mainly through the evaluation of the Cleveland Survey, the professionalization of the modern police, and the development of the Modern Penal Code.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Methods Of Judicial Selection Across The United States
    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Methods Of Judicial Selection Across The United States

    Methods of judicial selection vary substantially across the United States. Though each state has a unique set of guidelines governing how they fill their state and local judiciaries, there are five main methods. The five main methods are partisan elections, nonpartisan elections, legislative elections, Gubernational appointment, and assisted appointment.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Three Layers Of The Federal Court System
    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Three Layers Of The Federal Court System

    The federal court system is made up of 3 layers: the district courts, the circuit courts. These are the first layer of appeal. The final layer is appeal in the federal courts. There are 94 district courts, 13 circuit courts, and one Supreme Court throughout the country. The Supreme Court is the only court specifically mentioned in the Constitution; Article III mentions the Supreme Court.…

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Power Of The Judicial Branch
    • 135 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Power Of The Judicial Branch

    The Legislative Branch "House of Representatives/Congress" has the power to veto any bill's. The Legislative Branch has the power to remove or impeach any Judge from the Judicial Branch. Also, the Judicial Branch can declare any laws unconstitutional. The Judicial Branch is made up of the Supreme Court, Court of Appeal and District Court. The Judicial Branch has the power for the Executive Branch to decide if the president acts are unconstitutional. The Executive Branch has the power to nomination any judge. The Executive Branch is made up of the President, Independent government agencies and executive and cabinet departments. The Executive Branch has the power to veto any congressional legislation for the Legislative Branch. Lastly,…

    • 135 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics