Preview

Two Components Of Act Utilitarianism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
236 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Two Components Of Act Utilitarianism
The first rule is the Utilitarian Rule; this rule is based from Utilitarianism. “Utilitarianism was conceived in the 19th century by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill to help legislators determine which laws were morally best” (Velasquez). Utilitarianism states that an ethical decision should produce the greatest good for the greatest number of people. There are two components to Utilitarianism which are Act-utilitarianism and Rule-utilitarianism. Act-utilitarianism is the theory which states that a person’s actions are morally right if and only if they produce at least as much happiness as any other act that the person could perform at that time (Nathanson). The rule-utilitarianism says that an action is right as it conforms to a rule that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The essential part of utilitarianism, whether it is Act or Rule, is to promote the greatest overall utility for the given situation. If we look in terms of Utilitarianism, one would be in favor of killing Tom to save the other four children. Even though, Tom would be killed, he would promote overall utility by saving four people through his one body. This reminds me a lot of the Trolley problem we studied in Unit five. They killed one man to save multiple. This may be considered immoral in a way, but according to Act Utilitarianism, the correct choice and the one that promotes overall utility would be to kill Tom and use his body to save the four siblings. In an Act Utilitarian’s mind, they would first think “In what way could I promote the greatest utility for every single person in the situation?” They must then think about the situation. The mother and father could either lose Tom, or they could lose their other four children. The Doctor could either kill Tom and save the four children or let Tom live and watch the others die…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    With rule utilitarianism you first have to agree to the general rule then after you apply it to specific cases.…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Utilitarianism Act means to do the right action that will benefit a good amount of people over any other option. In the two examples I read from Bernard Williams “A Critique of Utilitarianism” I realized those were two difficult choices these two men had to make. However, if we follow the Utilitarianism Act, George would of taken the job offer and Jim would unfortunately sacrifice one of the protestors to save the rest. By George taking the job offer, it would benefit his family financially and also help his family’s emotional battle. Also, George opposing chemical and biological warfare would mean he wont have much interest compared to the other gentlemen that had much more interest on the subject. This will benefit a large amount of people…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are obvious problems with both Act and Rule Utilitarianism. Both theories share the common goal of achieving the greatest happiness for the greatest amount of people. However, it is impossible to measure or compare happiness, as one persons happiness may not necessarily be another’s. And how do we measure intangible gain, such as happiness against material gain, such as money? The root principle is a good concept, but it’s the means to which we arrive at the end that cause the problems. In my opinion, there is a greater problem with Act Utilitarianism versus Rule, because it justifies not only ethical but also unethical actions in order to achieve the desired results. It allows for the abuse of people’s rights, demoralizes and devalues the welfare of individuals if it brings enough happiness to the group. The group is nothing more than many individuals coming together to form a whole, and this group would eventually become just a group of demoralized and devalued people who would resort to any means necessary to get what they want because this is what they would be taught to do under the Act theory. This group would raise their children with these same principles, or lack of them, and the cycle would continue, producing a society that was almost egocentric in nature.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the article, “Strengths and Weaknesses of Utilitarianism”, Louis P. Pojman explained the grounds on which utilitarianism has been attacked and showed some possible response to its defenders which imply his positive attitude towards utilitarianism [1] . In order to argue that thesis, Pojman’s one important premise is the response to the no-rest objection. He believed that the agent should aim at maximizing his or her own happiness as well as other people’s happiness and is best not to worry much about the need of those not in our primary circle.[1] .…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Act Utilitarianism

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The theory of Utilitarianism was first developed by Jeremy Bentham who was a philosopher of the 18th century. Bentham developed this theory to create a modern and rational approach to morality which would suit the changing society.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    act and rule

    • 777 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Throughout this essay I will be comparing the Act and Rule variations of Utilitarianism to uncover the difference between the two. Utilitarianism is teleological or consequentialist approach to ethics, which argues that something is good or bad according to its benefit for the majority of the people. Jeremy Bentham formalized this theory through his principle of Utility, “the greatest good for the greatest number”. Act Utilitarianism is often linked to Jeremy Bentham’s principle of Utility as it follows the one rule – “the greatest good for the greatest number”. So an individual action is only right if it promotes happiness. Rule utilitarianism argues that moral rules, also based on the principle of Utility, should be kept by everyone in similar circumstances.…

    • 777 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I didn't like how the elections went this year. I don't like it because Donald Trump won and I think that because he won there will be a lot of bad things happening in the future. People are already being more racist than they were and he isn't even president yet. I think that there are going to be a lot of chaotic things happening because of Donald Trump. I also think that he would bring us the World War three because of how racist he is to other people . In the next few paragraphs I will be talking about why I think this and how it is already a problem that he is going to be president.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Act utilitarianism and Rule utilitarianism are two forms of Utilitarianism. Act utilitarianism is when someone carries out any activity which is beneficial among most people, in spite of the community restrictions (e.g. Laws) as well as individual feelings. Rule utilitarianism is when someone considers Law and is anxious with equality. Anyone who is a rule utilitarian tries to find out what benefits majority through equality.…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism is a teleological theory. Three main philosophers have come up with different types of utilitarianism these being: Bentham, Mill and Singer. Bentham introducing the idea of Act Utilitarianism, Mill adapting the ideas of Bentham and trying improve the flaws he saw with his Rule utilitarianism and Singer with his preference utilitarianism theory.…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Act and Utilitarianism

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Assess the view that a religious concept of love is the most difficult to put into practice. (20 Marks)…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shaw and Barry

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The second form of utilitarianism is called rule utilitarianism. According to our text, this form of utilitarianism maintains that the utilitarian standard should be applied, not to individual actions, but to moral codes as a whole (Shaw & Barry, p.76).…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is a further division between utilitarians; Act Utilitarianism and Rule Utilitarianism. Rule Utilitarianism, holds that one should always follow rules that tend to promote the general welfare of humans for example a rule might be not to killing people. Act Utilitarianism holds that one should always act to promote the general welfare.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism is a relativist, consequentialist and teleological system of ethics based on the idea of ‘utility’. This means usefulness and utilitarian suggest that everyone should be the most useful thing. The theory was devised by Jeremy Bentham who said “an action is right if it produces the greatest good for the greatest number”. He believed human beings are motivated by pleasure and pain.…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Adaptive Leadership Paper

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This weeks reading was informative and provided a good framework of what complex leadership is. Obolensky (2014) explains that polyarchy is really a fusion, or natural evolution, of anarchy and oligarchy, and that Complex Adaptive Leadership does not mean that traditional approaches have to be thrown out. To further understand the terms from the reading I did an overview of the meaning of anarchy, oligarchy, and polyarchy. Webster dictionary defines anarchy as the absence of government; oligarchy as a government by the few; and polyarchy as a government by many persons. This weeks reading also teaches how systems thinking are the opposite of analytical thinking (Obolensky, 2014). To elaborate, systems thinking takes the whole as primary and…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays