The first piece of evidence is when she saw Patrick coming home she closed the curtains this very suspicious. It seems as if she’s trying to keep people from seeing the murder. This piece of evidence could be not picky but the thing is thought seems premeditated so it seems smart to keep tabs on that small piece of evidence.
Another point of piece of evidence would be how she did not have any emotions and seemed unmerciful for her husband’s death. Right away she goes upstairs acting quick to practice smile when she runs off to the shop real quick creating many alibis for herself. …show more content…
As I pointed out in paragraph two another example would be her laugh at the detectives eating the murder weapon. If she did it on 2nd degree murder then she wouldn’t have laughed
I can understand those who think it was unintentional or reason insanity but her behavior proves otherwise no emotion like crying and laughing at her husband death. Makes it An invalid reason the only proof that she could be insane is her laughing but she’s very smart when it comes to murdering her husband so that’s ruled out
Mary Maloney is guilty of second degree murder because of her well executed plan no emotion after the murder and her laughter at the thought of the detectives eating the evidence she killed her husband Patrick the detective favored by all and loved by all will you let Maloney got away with the murder of Patrick Maloney you the jury must find Mary Maloney guilty without a