On the other hand, however, opponents of this view …show more content…
True to the letter, it is an ethical and social responsibility of the US armed forces to commit in absolute compliance with existing laws on national criminal record information systems (Riley, 2005). According to available literature, US armed forces are bound by current federal laws to promptly participate in the Criminal Justice Information Systems of the FBI. Specifically, they are required to engage in disclosing relevant data on the criminal history of military members for access and use by law enforcement agencies in background checks in their efforts to identify and mitigate incidents of crime in the society (Riley, …show more content…
Of particular significance here, the quality of this information depends on the extent to perceived knowledge of the involved criminals or activity by the reporter. With this in mind, since the US armed forces are better positioned in qualifying criminal activity amongst military members than a typical police officer (Toner, 2015), it is logical that there exist a special relationship between armed forces and law enforcement in the fight on crime. On the other hand, since criminal history is a core cause for criminal engagements in the future, information on criminal activity by military members falls under the situations in its code of ethical conduct where the US armed forces should report even without a formal request. This is because failure to do so amounts to betrayal by the US armed forces to law enforcement agencies (Frederickson & Rohr,