Preview

Uakari Tibia

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
987 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Uakari Tibia
I. Methodology- The lab over Inferring behavior from teeth and bones helps the students in analyzing the various types of bone structures that are prevalent in various types of primates. Such as in the beginning of the lab we were given three different casts of different primate species that were in a wooden box that contained a cast of the skull and mandible for all three species also specimen’s A & B had a tibia, fibula, radius, and an ulna that went along with their cast of their skulls. While performing the lab, the students had to identify the dental formula for each of the three species and determine the primate group the species belong to. Such as if the dental formula matched up with a Ateloidea superfamily which represents all the new world monkeys the dental formula would be a 2.1.3.3 for both the mandible and the maxilla of the primate skull. After determining the dental formula, the student had to measure the tibia & fibula and the radius & ulna of both specimen’s A & B to determine their type of locomotion that they used to get around.

II.
…show more content…
Station 2 Specimen A: I hypothesize that Specimen A which is a red bald Uakari is arboreal quadruped. This is because the red bald Uakari has a more or less equal fore-to-hind limb ratio as such the forelimb measures at 11cm for the ulna and 11.4cm for the radius and the hind limbs measure at 13.3cm for the fibula and 13.7cm for the tibia. This indicates that the red bald Uakari uses both fore-to-hind limbs as a primary form of locomotion to get from tree to tree. In addition, the red bald Uakari has a triangle shape back foot with a pushed back big toe that is close to the heel making it easier to grasp tree limbs and branches. Also, the conclusion can be supported by the shape of the cast of the skull matches the shape of the red bald uakari and the ridge on the occipital can indicate an area for attachments of muscles to keep the skull facing forward primarily because the Uakari is an arboreal

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Postorbital ring 2. Dental comb 3. Tapetum Lucidum Tarsiers more like monkeys in their genetics Primate Fossil Ancestry: Events Preceding Primates Ca. 500 MYA: first vertebrates in fossil record Ca. 250 MYA: Pangea II forms- nearly all land is one big continent Ca.…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A N P Hassan's Story

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages

    G. If the bone of a person found at the excavation site were mixed up and out of sequence, how could the anthropologists determine which vertebrae were…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A and P Lab 5

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Examine your skull model and describe some ways in which the mandible is different from the other bones of the skull.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lab Write Up

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The tooth formula is a shorthand technique that biologist use to keep track of the teeth on a particular jaw. The formula consisted of two lines, top jaw and bottom jaw, which were used to count how many incisors, canines, premolars, and molar teeth a species had. Species A, Odocoileus virginiaus (white-tailed deer), had a tooth formula of 0033/3133. On the top jaw, the deer had zero incisor and canine teeth but have three of both the premolars and molars. On the bottom jaw, the deer had three incisors, one canine, three premolars, and three molars. Species B, Canis latrans (coyote), had a tooth formula of 3142/3143. On the top jaw, the coyote had three incisors, one canine, four premolars, and two molars. On the bottom jaw, the coyote has three incisors, one canine, four premolars, and three molars. Both the deer and coyote skull were long and skinny towards the nose and mouth. The coyote skull had a much rounder nose than the deer. Species C, Homo sapiens (human), had a tooth formula of 2122/2122. On both the top and bottom jaws, there were two incisors, one canine, two premolars, and two molars. In comparison to the deer and coyote skull, the human was an outcast. The human skull was a short distance from the back of the skull to the front. The human skull was very different in bone structure and longer in height than the deer and coyote skulls.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unit 2 Primate Case Study

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages

    While examining the primate I would look at their dental formulas. By looking at these characteristics it can help differentiate the New World Monkeys from the old world monkeys and apes. For example, if the primate were to have a 2.1.3.3 dental formula they would be considered a New World Monkey. After observing them and seeing if they are tree-dwellers I can also come to the conclusion that he or she is a New World Monkey. While looking at the nose we can also determine if they are Old World Monkeys, New World Monkeys, or apes. If their nose faces down they would fall under the category of apes and Old World Monkeys. However, after being examined and looking at their traits I would come to the conclusion that the primate is a New World…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Becoming Human Worksheet

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages

    larger Brains short heavy set Body hunters Food Source Why are the teeth of children particularly helpful in providing information about extinct hominids?…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anthropology

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Furthermore, due to the nature of the case and the extensive heat alteration that occurred to the bones, recognition of the bones as human or non-human became hard to discern. However, by employing certain osteological methods anthropologist could characterize the highly fragmented remains. One such method frequently utilized by the forensic team was determining the maturity and architecture of the bones, as well as the analysis of the cranium, which is very distinct from any non-human (Byers, 2011). Similarly, the presence of projecting saber like teeth,…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    For many years, numerous individuals including anthropologists have attempted to explain how a single species evolved into another. From the time of Charles Darwin to Creationism, anthropologists have established that chimpanzees are human’s closet relative. Furthermore, with the extensive voluminous amount of information, not only are chimpanzees genetically and evolutionary similar to human but share analogous traits. For instance, chimpanzees like human make and utilized tools in various techniques. Another trait shared is eutheria, where offspring depend on the placenta and grown internally of their paternities. In addition to the highly mobile digits that assist chimpanzees in grasping and climbing. These illustrations are just a few. This paper is twofold; to highlight humans and chimpanzees shared traits that can aid in recreating the past of humans, secondly to heighten my knowledge of the evolution of humankind and chimpanzees.…

    • 1804 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    These gibbons are commonly found in the rain forests of Southeast Asia (Golden-Cheeked Gibbon plaque, 2018). Although they are heavily arboreal, they do not possess a tail nor a prehensile tail. There does not seem to be any sexual dimorphism present amongst the male and female. Their form of locomotion is brachiation which means they rely on their upper limbs to move from tree limb to tree limb. The cage at the zoo consisted of only two adult individuals.…

    • 1611 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Primate Evolution Essay

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A group of scientists lead by Biren Patel have recently found a partial mandible of an ancient primate related to lemurs. Scientists have named the new species Ramadapis sahnii and claim that it existed 11 to 14 million years ago, and is a member of the early primate family Sivaladapidae. Analysis of the jawbone shows that the species consumed leaves and was approximately the same size as a house cat, or to a modern day lemur. This discovery is important to the scientific community as with this discovery more information surrounding the evolutionary history of primates can be gathered and analysed. This new species will also help expand the phylogenetic tree for primates, making it significant to any scientist researching primate evolution.…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Primate Observation Essay

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There is a lot I learned studying the primates. Primates are very fascinating and I think there is a lot more to learn about them. Primates have many different characteristics and because of this they are classified in different groups of species. I did my observation on prosimians, monkeys, and apes as well. The observation was conducted at the Sacramento Zoo of nine primate species. Out of the nine there are three primates that caught my attention and it’s the Ring Tail Lemur, White Faced Saki, and the Chimpanzee. All the observation took place almost in the afternoon during their feeding time and they were not that active but were still able to observe their behavior.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Primate Observation

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages

    These non-human primates compared to human primates in many ways. For example, they all share the concept of caregiving. In all three primate groups I observed the mother caring for her baby. In humans the mother also cares for her baby when is born in similar ways as the non-human primates. I learned a lot of information about primates by doing this assignment, observing the behaviors of each primate group was impressive and that the way they behave is similar to humans.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    If we are looking to the primate for a record of Hunter and Gatherer behaviors then we must be very careful indeed not to anthropomorphize characteristics in either direction.…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gather information from secondary sources (including photos/diagrams/models) to observe, analyse and compare the structure of vertebrate forelimbs.…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nature of Humans

    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Lacked a sectorial premolar or honing complex, a characteristic of apes and old world monkeys, shearing tooth…

    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays