PROJECT REPORT
ON
Part performance of the Law of Torts-Ubi jus ibi remedium
BH
SUBMITTED TO
Mats Law school, Raipur
Guided by:
Prof.shri D.S.Jain
----------------------------
Miss. Sona Rizvi
----------------------------
Submitted By:
Miss. Aruna Adiley
Student-LLB
1st Semester
DECLARATION
I, Miss. Aruna Adiley here declare that this report is record of
Authentic work carried out by me during the academic year 2012-2013.
Signature of the student
Miss. Aruna Adiley
------------------------------------
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
It is a matter of great pleasure for me to submit this report based on my project in “Part performance of the legal Method –Precedent” which I do feel will be an asset throughout my life.
I am grateful and express my sincere thanks to Jain Sir & sona mem, for giving me the opportunity to collect data and information about the project and helping me through various means in completion of the project report.
I am immensely grateful to my esteemed guide all my Faculties whose continued and invaluable guidance can never be neglected.
It “s my pleasure to thanks all the people involved in completion of the project and their valuable contribution to my project report.
I sincerely thank the administration of Mats Law College for including such a thoughtful process of Project Report into our curriculum of LLB.
“Miss. Aruna adiley,
INTRODUCTION
DOCTRINE OF PART PERFORMANCE.
Judicial precedent is another important source of law. It is a distinguishing feature of the English legal system since most of the common law is unwritten and owes its origin to judicial precedents.
Precedents have a binding force on judicial tribunals for deciding like-cases in future. In continental countries such as Germany, France, Italy, Judicial Precedent has only instructive value and it is not authoritative. Its importance isno greater than that of a text book of law. On the other hand, in English legal system, it has authoritative importance and is, in fact, a legal source of law which the courts are bound to follow.
According to Salmond the doctrine of precedent has two meanings, namely:
(1) In a loose sense precedent includes merely reported case-law which may be cited and followed by the courts.
(2) In its strict sense Precedent means that case-law which not only has a great binding authority but must also be followed. Holdsworth supports the doctrine of precedent Has become a debatable issue. There is no dissatisfaction with the practice of citing cases andattaching weight to them, the difference of opinion, is as to the present practice of treating precedents absolutely binding.
Precedent as a source of law: -
precedent has a binding force and therefore, it is an important source of law.
Expressing his views on precedents Blackstone pointed out that it is an established rule to abide by the former precedents where the same points come again in litigation.
They also keep the scale of justice, even and steady and not liable to be waived away with every new judge’s opinion.
Justice Cardozo also supports the view that adherence to precedents should be the rule and not an exception.
The rule of precedents should, however, be abandoned if it is inconsistent with the sense of justice or derogatory to social welfare policy.
The practice of precedents has gained favour with English courts because it leads to certainty of law and also predictability of decision is always preferable to approximation of ideals. Again, it enables illogical and unsatisfactory decisions to be overruled to meet the ends of justice.
Nature of judicial precedents.-
A judicial, precedent is purely constitutive in nature and never abrogative.
This in other words means that it can create law but cannot abolish it. The judges are not at liberty to substitute their own views where there is a settled principle of law.
They can only fill in the gaps in the legal system and remove imperfections in the existing legal system.
DEFINITION
Definitions of Precedents
(a) Gray.-A Precedent covers everything said or done which furnishes a rule for subsequent practice.
(b) Keeton. A ‘judicial precedent’ is ajudicial decision to which authority has, in some measures, been attached.
Classification of precedents:-
Of Precedents described As stepping stones and not halting places, many arbitrary distinctions have been made. But for Our present purposes we shall take into consideration the following kinds of precedents:-
*Declaratory and original precedents: –
it has already been pointed out in this chapter that judicial decisions are of two types, namely, those which create a new law, and those which apply to only known and settled principles of law to the particular facts of the case for decision. 1) Decision of both kinds function as precedents, because the legal principles embodied therein are authoritative guides to courts in the determination of future controversies.
2) But a declaratory precedent is not a source of new law, whereas original precedent is generally speaking, there are quite good number of declaratory precedents, for on most points the aw is already settled and judicial decisions are mere declarations of pre-existing rules.
3) On the other hand, original precedents, though lesser in number, are greater in importance, for they alone develop the law.
*Authoritative and persuasive precedents:-
An authoritative precedent is that which judges must follow irrespective of whether they approve of it or not. It is binding upon them and excludes their judicial discretions for the future. Authoritative precedents recognized as legal sources of law are the decisions of the superior courts of justice on England. In India a judicial precedent of the Supreme Court is authoritative in connection with the high courts and other subordinate courts, whereas a judicial precedent of a particular high court is authoritative only within the jurisdiction of the high courts.
Authoritative precedents have generally been Classed as absolutely authoritative precedents or conditionally authoritative precedents. The former are deemed as absolutely binding and therefore, to be followed even if they appear to be erroneous, with certain exception, the absolute authority of precedents in England exist in the following three cases, viz. (1) That the House of lords is absolutely bound by its own decisions, (2) That the court of appeal is bound by its own decisions and by those of the court of coordinate authority, (3) That every court is absolutely bound by the decision of the court superior to itself.
*Conditionally authoritative precedent. –
It is that which though normally binding on the courts is likely to be disregarded in certain circumstances. While defining a conditionally authoritative precedent, salmond said: “in al ordinary cases it is binding, but there is one special case in which its authority may be lawfully denied. It may be overruled or dissented from, when it is not merely wrong but so clearly and seriously wrong that its reversal is demanded in the interests of the sound administration of justice. Otherwise it must be followed, even though the court which follows it is persuaded that it is erroneous or unreasonable. The chief difference thus between the absolutely authoritative precedent and conditionally authoritative precedent is that the former is absolutely binding and, therefore, cannot be set aside unless it has been overruled by a statute or there is a conflicting precedent of equal authority or of a superior court, whereas the latter is that, that is binding on the courts, unless it is too seriously wrong that its reversal is needed in the administration of justice.
Effect of time on precedents.
– salmond says that other things being equal a precedent acquires added authority from the lapse of time, a decision, which might be lawfully overruled without hesitation while yet new, may, after the lapse of a number of years acquire such increased strength as to be practically of absolute, authority and no longer of merely conditional authority.
But lapse of time need not always add authority to a precedent. It may sometimes have the opposite effect. If a precedent has not been subsequently acted upon for a long time, it may well be taken to have been forgotten or ignored, especially if it is not in harmony with the current ideas. To revive such a precedent, may also do as much injustice as the overruling of a well established rule.
BIBILIOGARPHY
WWW.google.com
www.low.com
Law books
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Inbrief.co.uk,. 'Precedents: What Are They And When Are They Used? '. N.p., 2015. Web. 20 Mar. 2015.…
- 1917 Words
- 8 Pages
Best Essays -
In this question I will be defining what the Binding Precedent is and its main principles that are applied in judicial precedent. I will look at the structure of the court system and whether in this structure the courts are being bound by the decision of others higher courts. I will reflect at how far the binding precedent goes to ensure the existence of both certainty and flexibility in common law. I will talk about the advantages and disadvantages that contribute to the doctrine of binding precedent including examples of previous cases. Finally I will come to a conclusion if I agree overall with Gardiner’s practice statement of 1966.…
- 2569 Words
- 11 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The American criminal court system plays a major role in our country. Without this system, all of those who violate the law would be entitled to do whatever they want and not held accountable for their actions. Defining the court and its purpose it’s something that will makes us understand the system a little better. The dual court system, also plays a major role in our countries system and will be defined in this paper. Describing the role that early legal codes, the common law, and precedent played in the development of courts will also be defined in depth…
- 896 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Legal precedent recognizes the value of the past. Yet the judiciary is engaged in evaluating legal precedent as applied to contemporary cases. Inevitably, the role of common law in recognizing and altering precedent as applied to contemporary cases results in the creation of new precedents, which in turn will be evaluated in the future. Common law might be bound by general social principles in legal contexts, but it inevitably places the judiciary in the role of evaluating the continued relevance of those principles as new legal contexts emerge through civil…
- 3787 Words
- 16 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The theory of legal precedent has changed the face of the Criminal Justice System and Criminal Courts in many ways. Previously judges made decisions solely on what they believed, without mentioning existing cases. The decisions were only base on what they were told about the pending case, and with that information they provided a suitable conclusion. Today judges base their decisions on previous cases, to be able to justify their actions. Legal precedent is extremely beneficial to our Criminal justice system and our court system because it allows consistency, reliability and predictability within our decisions.…
- 236 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
The English law system is one of the major European legal systems which strictly formulated by different procedures. At present, it has spread and implement in many other countries such as Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. This essay would discuss the three main sources of law, which are Acts of parliament, judiciary precedent and statutory interpretation and also evaluate the relationship between legislation and judicial precedent. Furthermore, the rules of interpretation that contain Literal Rule, Golden Rule and Mischief would be explained in the second part of this essay by several appropriate cases.…
- 2195 Words
- 9 Pages
Better Essays -
Precedents can be found in law reports and the doctrine of judicial precedent depends upon an accurate record being kept of previous decisions.…
- 1941 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Sixth Form Law, ‘Mechanics of Precedents - The Denning Story’ http://sixthformlaw.info/01_modules/mod2/2_1_1_precedent_mechanics/09_precedent_denning.htm accessed April 24, 2011…
- 2119 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
5. The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, (2007). Corpus Juris Civilic. [online] Columbia University Press. Available from: < http://www.infoplease.com/ce6/society/A0813641.html > [Accessed 16 March 2009].…
- 1969 Words
- 8 Pages
Best Essays -
I take this opportunity to thank my Industrial Guide Mr.Kartik Mohindra for his invaluable support and guidance, without which the completion of this project would have been impossible. It was under his supervision and mentorship that I was able to come out with the project report which was an enriching and knowledgeable experience. I would also like to extend my special thanks to my faculty guide Prof. A.K.Biswas who helped me in every step of the project.…
- 10332 Words
- 42 Pages
Good Essays -
So, I hope I have tried my level best to bring in new ideas and thoughts regarding the basics of this topic. Not to forget the deep sense of regard and gratitude to my faculty adviser, Miss Vasudhara Kamath, who played the role of a protagonist. Last but not the least; I thank all the members of the MATS Law School and all others who have helped me in making this project a success.…
- 4824 Words
- 20 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Judicial Precedent is another important source of law, it is an independent source of law, where there are no legislations on the particular point in statute Books, and Judicial Precedent works great. Judicial precedent has been accepted as one of the important sources of law in most of the legal systems. It is also a continuous, growing source of law.…
- 1316 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
ITM LAW SCHOOL, COURT ROOM EXERCISE [pic] [pic] [pic] IN THE HON’BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA IN THE MATTER OF AN. Roy, Commissioner of Police Vs. Suresh Sham Singh [pic] WRITTEN SUBMISSION ON BEHALF OF THE APELLANT [pic]…
- 1525 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Bibliography: Elliot, C & Quinn, F (2008): English Legal System, 9th Edition, Pearson Longman pp 1-60…
- 1729 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
The views, opinions, statements and legal conclusions contained in this project are those of the author, and also represent official statements or opinions. Any errors or misstatements in this project are exclusively those of the author. These guidelines are provided by the concerned faculty in an effort to provide better understanding of Biofuels in a larger extent. These guidelines are NOT meant to constitute legal advice. They simplify and broadly generalize complex issues of law. I appreciate the assistance of Andhra University, Library incharge, DSNLU faculty and my dad, who helped me in this assignment.…
- 6511 Words
- 22 Pages
Powerful Essays