Understanding Ferguson's View On Human Progression

In our current era man has been blinded by the sources of wealth and technology therefore, hindering the progress of our morality, social contracts and views on valuation.
[Mickyle J.D. De Las]

Abstract With our new views with technology and wealth, is it possible to say that our human nature has gone astray from the idealism idea of human progression or has it just evolved in its own. By understanding Fergusons view on the progression of our human nature he explains how we have shifted from our natural path to one of more self-interest affecting our natural morality. Therefore has effected our political judgements creating corruption meaning the dishonest conduct of the use of power for personal gain, globally and within each government.
By the moral standards of personal interest we have not learned but just further declined in our social behaviors and evolution. Even with the use of technology at our use, how have we socially and individually progressed? Communication has become global therefore news and information is available to the use of anyone but is used in the wrong way. Our current nature progression has always thrived on competition instead of teamwork. By this idea of first and not last we have become self-subjective in the pleasure of self success rather than the success of a nation or team. Don’t misunderstand me, success is not the issue but the moral action to which people venture for the success can be detrimental to our moral character. Ferguson tried to elaborate on the justification of human progression in comparison to nature or animals and to how we differentiate from those
This new are of technology has spoilt the human influence in consumption and use of good and services for our own personal gain. Rousseau explains that each individual must retain natural to the rights and liberty given. The rights should be look at over our individual selves but for the rights of the community. The use and innovation of our technology has blinded the fragmentation of this belief. With the introduction of technology for personal gain such as war, mass production and social relations, we have failed to justify our own personal morality. The rights to the community was to establish a moral collection body or a political body that thrives for the generally will of the common good. These task should not inbound anyone or influence any change in our moral behaviors. By minimizing the level of corruption leading the people to a non-bias or partially gain, the use of our technology can be put for the production of social supply rather than personal benefits. Technology has created new ventures for innovation but has also changed the social morality of our character and the social image of each other by creating boundaries between classes and individuals. This changes of corruption has formed a large wealth distribution with in the bounders of the United States. The level of corruption and influence of technology has molded an luxurious