Preview

Understanding Thoughts Through Language

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
944 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Understanding Thoughts Through Language
Christina Kompanijec
English 200
Argumentative essay: draft four

If asked which cognitive ability you would miss the most if it were taken away, the majority of people would respond with the obvious choices of sight or hearing, but how many people would think about our sense of language? Language affects our lives in ways that we do not often realize. In the essay “How Language Shapes Thought” Lera Boroditsky argues that many of our cognitive abilities are enhanced, or hindered depending on the fundamental structure of our system of language. I found that Boroditsky used much of her own research in order to support her claims that direction, time and gender are concepts largely affected by the structural system of our language. Overall I found Boroditsky’s arguments to be sound and thorough. I agree with her claims that language shapes thought.
When visiting a small town in northern Australia, Boroditsky came to realize that the residents had an impeccable sense of direction; contrasting to that of the American scholars she repeated the experiment with back in the United States (Boroditsky 63). Boroditsky reached the conclusion that direction is one of many cognitive aspects that are largely shaped by language. I found Boroditsky’s theories hard to refute as she backed them up with many hard facts. Boroditsky furthers her credibility through the acknowledgement of previous flaws within the theory, as seen in the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis which lacked any major empirical evidence. Boroditsky is able to show the importance of a language’s structure and the how it impacts the meanings and thoughts behind the words that are used. “Suppose I want to tell you that I saw Uncle Vanya on 42nd Street. In Mian, a language spoken in Papua New Guinea, the verb I used would reveal whether the event happened just now, yesterday or in the distant past, whereas in Indonesian, the verb wouldn’t even give away whether it had already happened or was still coming up. And in



Cited: Boroditsky, Lera. "How Language Shapes Thought." Psych.stanford.edu. N.p., 2011. Web.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    S. I. Hayakawa and Alan R. Hayakawa. Language in Thought and Action. 5th ed. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1990.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Boroditsky asks the audience rhetorical questions to keep them engaged and to challenge their perspective. In the beginning of the article, Boroditsky asks “Do the languages we speak shape the way we think?” By doing this, Boroditsky not only sets the framework for the entirety of the article, but also gets the audience to think about this question as they continue to read on. At the end of the article, Boroditsky argues in conclusion that language constructs knowledge. Boroditsky probes further at this idea by asking “How do we come to be the way we are?”…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Though it is impossible to determine when language arose, it has been theorized that the growth of language coincided with the increase in brain volume. The brain is the control system of the body. All aspects of human behavior, language, reflexes, emotions, memory, are controlled by separate structure of the brain. Within these structures are billions of neurons, specialized cells that transmit information throughout the brain in the form of electrical signals. The brain is split into two hemispheres, the left hemisphere controlling the activities of the right side, and the right hemisphere controlling the activities of the left side. Regarding language, it was discovered that the left hemisphere of the brain is largely responsible for controlling language. More specifically, the outer surface of the central hemisphere, the cortex, is regarded as the center of human speech and language processing. Two structure of the cortex, Broca’s and Wernicke’s are responsible for speech production and understanding of written and spoken language, respectively.…

    • 1454 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Psy 360

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Language is very complex and the manner at which humans learn language is even more complex. Language is more than just words and with words there are also definitions this paper will explain what language and lexicon is. Language is connected to cognitive functions in so many ways that this is better explained throughout the paper. There are key features in language that is developed during childhood and continues to grow as children get bigger. Language has a structure and processing through four levels. These levels better help humans understand language and communicate to one another. The connections in language processing and cognitive psychology are better understood later on in this paper. First to start off with a better understanding of what language and lexicon is.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sapir Whorf

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The chapter identifies a number of key examples of flaws in the deterministic interpretation of the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, contrasting this interpretation to the relativistic interpretation of the same hypothesis. Drawing on the viewpoints of numerous learned individuals, the author effectively outlines the failure of the hypothesis to support the theory of linguistic determinism, while addressing the valuable evidence that the Sapir-Whorf theory provides in support of the theory of linguistic relativity. A brief history of the publishing and reception of the hypothesis is given, and Whorf’s role in directing the hypothesis towards the metaphysics of the natural sciences is highlighted. Studies such as Hoijer’s application of Whorfian ideas to the relations between language structure and aspects of culture among the Navajo are mentioned in the article, providing perspective on the scope and scale of applications resultant of the hypothesis. However, due to a lack of specific examples, the article does not present much in light of the hypothesis’ reasoning on the relationship between language and thought.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Herbert S. Terrace's article, "Thinking Without Language" discusses the concept of thought in animals, and the effect that language may have on their thought processes. Focusing on the thinking capabilities of apes, Terrace's initial experiments taught a chimpanzee American Sign Language, studying if chimpanzees could combine words to form new meanings. Terrace conducted his own experiments with chimpanzees because of the potentially dubious integrity of past studies to prove chimpanzees' ability for thought or language. Terrace's own results supported Descartes' idea of animals being incapable of using language, his chimpanzee mostly only mimicking its trainers, rather than forming its own sentences. Wondering if or how animals think without…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Language and Lexicon Paper

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Language as we know it is very hard to define because it is the linguistics of the language, but we know it is important for our life. It is very important tool to express my feeling and opinion, and we could know what others think about. As a result, we could make connection with others. However, have you ever thought why we can communicate each other? Do you know why human’s communication is defined as language and other animal’s communication is not defined as language? For example, dog has different vocalization like barks, and whines, but it is their communication tool like our language. So, their vocalization has some meaning such as “I am hungry,” and “I want to go outside.” We know how to interpret the dog’s utterances, but we cannot define the different vocalization as language. There are many reasons what define language. Thus, by exploring the definition of language and lexicon, evaluating language’s key features, the four levels of language structure and processing, and role of language in cognitive psychology, an understanding of what language is become clear.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Digital Natives

    • 6582 Words
    • 30 Pages

    20. Dr. Michael S. Gazzaniga, neuroscientist at Dartmouth College quoted in Robert Lee Hotz “In Art of…

    • 6582 Words
    • 30 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this paper, I am going to write about how language and thought are closely related to each other. The reason I am highly interested on the topic “Thinking & Language” is because I speak 7 languages, and I realized that my personality, thinking, attitude and behavior change with the language I speak. I feel like there are many versions of “ME”.…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Seventy years ago, in 1940, a popular science magazine published a short article that set in motion one of the trendiest intellectual fads of the 20th century. At first glance, there seemed little about the article to augur its subsequent celebrity. Neither the title, “Science and Linguistics,” nor the magazine, M.I.T.’s Technology Review, was most people’s idea of glamour. And the author, a chemical engineer who worked for an insurance company and moonlighted as an anthropology lecturer at Yale University, was an unlikely candidate for international superstardom. And yet Benjamin Lee Whorf let loose an alluring idea about language’s power over the mind, and his stirring prose seduced a whole generation into believing that our mother tongue restricts what we are able to think. In particular, Whorf announced, Native American languages impose on their speakers a picture of reality that is totally different from ours, so their speakers would simply not be able to understand some of our most basic concepts, like the flow of time or the distinction between objects (like “stone”) and actions (like “fall”). For decades, Whorf’s theory dazzled both academics and the general public alike. In his shadow, others made a whole range of imaginative claims about the supposed power of language, from the assertion that Native American languages instill in their speakers an intuitive understanding of Einstein’s concept of time as a fourth dimension to the theory that the nature of the Jewish religion was determined by the tense system of ancient Hebrew. Eventually, Whorf’s theory crash-landed on hard facts and solid common sense, when it transpired that there had never actually been any evidence to support his fantastic claims. The reaction was so severe that for decades, any attempts to explore the influence of the mother tongue on our thoughts were relegated to the loony fringes of disrepute. But 70 years on, it is surely time to put the…

    • 4340 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    If asked where you were at this moment in time, would you be able to communicate in…

    • 757 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the Wall Street Journal, Lost in Translation is an article about how language has influenced the way people view the world. Lera Boroditsky ask the public a question if language really shapes the way we speak without even noticing that our brain is even doing that. She explains that English language marks the verb tense, but that the Russian language marks the verb tense and describes the gender as well. In the Turkish language you would require the verb and the information to support the verb. Also, there are many controversies about linguistics between law, politics and religion. Boroditsky states that the question of whether language has really shape the way we think goes back to Charlemagne's times. It is said that there is 7,000 languages…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Does Language Shape Thought?

    • 9105 Words
    • 37 Pages

    Lucy, J. (1992). Grammatical categories and cognition: A case study of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press. Lucy, J., & Shweder, R. (1979). Whorf and his critics: Linguistic and nonlinguistic influences on color memory. American Anthropologist, 81, 581–618. Macnamara, J. (1972). Cognitive basis of language learning in infants. Psychological Review, 79, 1–13. Markman, E., & Hutchinson, J. (1984). Children’s sensitivity to constraints on word meaning: Taxonomic versus thematic relations. Cognitive Psychology, 16, 1–27. Nelson, K. (1973). Some evidence for the cognitive primacy of categorization and its functional basis. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 19, 21–39. Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 192–233. Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In R. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Scott, A. (1989). The vertical dimension and time in Mandarin. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 9, 295–314. Sera, M., Berge, C., & del Castillo, J. (1994). Grammatical and conceptual forces in the attribution of gender by English and Spanish speakers. Cognitive Development, 9(3), 261–292. Slobin, D. (1987). Thinking for speaking. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, 13, 435–445. Slobin, D. (1996). From ‘‘thought and language’’ to ‘‘thinking for speaking.’’ In J. Gumperz & S. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 70–96). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Univ. Press. Tardif, T. (1996). Nouns are not always learned before verbs, but why? Evidence from Mandarin Chinese. Developmental Psychology, 32(3), 492–504. Traugott, E. (1978). On the expression of spatiotemporal relations in language. In J. H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of human language: Word structure (Vol. 3, pp. 369–400). Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press. Waxman, S., & Kosowski, T. (1990). Nouns mark category relations: Toddlers’ and Preschoolers’ word-learning biases. Child Development, 61, 1461–1473. Whorf, B. (1956). In J. B. Carroll (Ed.), Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Accepted June 10, 1999, published online May 3, 2001)…

    • 9105 Words
    • 37 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Trea

    • 47228 Words
    • 189 Pages

    An informal discussion of a linguistic myth with Noam Chomsky and other linguists, philosophers, psychologists, and lexicographers…

    • 47228 Words
    • 189 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There is a question- how is it that we have certain ideas which are not conclusively derivable from our environments? Noam Chomsky has taken this problem as a philosophical framework for the scientific enquiry into Innatism. His linguistic theory attempts to explain in cognitive terms how we can develop knowledge of systems which are too rich and complex to be derived from our environment as our linguistic faculty. Our linguistic systems contain a systemic complexity which could not be empirically derived. The environment is too variable and indeterminate to explain the extraordinary ability to learn complex concepts possessed by very young children. It follows that humans must be born with a universal innate grammar, which is determinate and has a highly organized directive component, and enables the language learner to ascertain and categorize language heard into a system. In this way, linguistics has provided a window into the human mind, and has established scientific theories of innateness which were previously merely speculative.…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays