Preview

Understaning the Tito-Stalin Split

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
5450 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Understaning the Tito-Stalin Split
Understanding the Tito-Stalin Split
Introduction
The split between Josip Broz Tito, leader of Yugoslavia, and Joseph Stalin, head of the Soviet Union, is arguably one of the most watershed moments in Soviet history. It was a sign of a rising and powerful Yugoslavia, the first break in the Eastern bloc, and inspired a shift in Soviet policy and political thought. Focusing on the timespan from 1941 to 1948, I claim that, though the break between the two leaders was caused by a variety of factors, the root cause was Stalin’s prioritizing of foreign relations with the West. Stalin’s attempts to appease the Western powers went against Tito’s interests in spreading Yugoslavia’s influence. This is particularly true regarding Tito’s involvement in the Greek civil war, and his relations with Albania. It was a shock to Tito, and to the rest of the world, that Stalin decided to placate the West rather than side with Yugoslavia on these matters.1 However, realistically speaking, the Soviet Union was in no position to provoke the Western world post-World War II. Therefore, it is my thinking that the main source of friction between Stalin and Tito stemmed from their disagreements in prioritizing good relations with the West.

Background Information Leading up to the Tito-Stalin Split: From 1941 to 1948
After Stalin’s non-aggression pact with Germany fell through in in 1941, the USSR was pushed into the camp of the Western allies. In the April of that year, the Axis powers invaded Yugoslavia. Thus, the Yugoslav Partisan resistance, led by Marshal Tito, was left to defend the nation. The Yugoslav Partisans were extremely successful at liberating their country, especially when compared to other resistance movements in Europe,2 as the Red Army only arrived after most of the fighting had already been done. “The arrival of the Soviet mission after two and a half years of delay turned out to be something of an anticlimax,” and Tito himself considered the belated deployment as

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    After the end of the Second World War, the world was left with two superpowers with competing ideologies: The United States of America and the Soviet Union. The Americans had come out of the war with a surging economy and served as the flagship for the capitalist nations of the West. The Soviets on the other hand practiced Communism, an ideology that was seen as a great threat to the Western way of life. 1 Though they had been allied at the end of the war, both nations quickly moved to bolster their military and economic infrastructure to prepare for the era of pseudo-colonialism and competition between the two powers they both knew would follow. By 1949, the Soviets would become the world’s second nuclear power, launching most of the world into a full out cold war between the communist East and the capitalist West. Competition between these ideologies meant that each side would fight to protect their influence in foreign nations, to spread their ideologies to new nations, and to protect against the spread of their enemy’s ideology to new nations; a policy the West…

    • 2308 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Lewis Gaddis Summary

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this book writer, John Lewis Gaddis has talked about how Russia and eastern Europe are changing the way history specialists take a gander at the icy war. The primary contention that was made by the writer in this book was " How Soviet's perspective of one-sided security crashed into US's conviction that security is multilateral to create two ranges of prominence: one of compulsion and one of assent." The Partners Atlantic Contract, August 1941,Roosevelt, and Churchill announced 3 Wilsonian after war goals to guarantee global security through a multilateral approach: self-assurance, open market, and aggregate security. Stalin had firmly connected state security with his very own security and trusted security must be accomplished by denying every other person of it and picking up an area while the US thought of security as an aggregate decent inescapable clash.…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ww1 Unit 4

    • 4634 Words
    • 19 Pages

    How did ‘The Marshall Plan’ further divide Western and Eastern Europe, and what were Stalin’s reasons for encouraging Eastern Europe to not accept US…

    • 4634 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gaddis Cold War Summary

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Gaddis re-examines the Cold War with new information from all around the globe, creating a “new” cold war history. Gaddis pinpoints the start of the Cold War as 1947 and notes “the regime, personality, and ideological explanations for the Cold War point to an underlying defensive motivation: the need to expand and assert control to save Stalin and the Soviet Union.” (Lebow, p.628) Gaddis also sustains that Stalin’s personality and paranoia influenced events. It seems the “new” cold war history is actually the same as the “old” cold war standpoint because Gaddis concluded: “who then was responsible [for the Cold War]? The answer, I think, is authoritarianism in general, and Stalin in particular.” (Gaddis, p.294)…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    dbq on ww2

    • 780 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In order to prove itself as being more powerful than the United States, the Soviet Union spread its form of government to other countries around the world—whether by using force or by aiding the creation of communist governments. The maps in Doc 1 and Doc 7 illustrate the Soviets’ desire to spread communism, not just to their satellite nations around them, but even farther to Vietnam. It would have been helpful to add a map of the communist and non-communist countries in Europe before WWII to compare to Doc 1 in order to highlight the amount of control the USSR gained trying to beat the US in the Cold War. Documents 3 and 9 suggest that, aside from a few rebels, Hungary and Nicaragua welcomed the Soviets’ help in switching to communism and training communist soldiers. However, docs 2 and 9 offer contradictory viewpoints which suggest that Russian invaded their countries and unwillingly coerced a communist government on them, when the Hungarian radio station says, “Early this morning Soviet troops launched a general attack on Hungary,” (Doc 2) and when Violeta Chamorro in doc 10 calls for Nicaraguans to fight for freedom by, “burying Communism and proclaiming democracy.” Doc 3 was a broadcast on a Moscow radio station, so it portrays the USSR as being in control so that the citizens of the Soviet Union will support their government. Although it biased against the USSR, doc 2 probably more accurately describes how Hungary was affected by the Soviets’ goal of the Cold War to be more powerful than the US. Doc 9 is relatively neutral, but since doc…

    • 780 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    During the time of post-World War II Soviet geopolitical expansion, the political and economic future of European nations were at stake. Truman described the situation as autocratic regimes undermining democratic countries, using political, economic and military means to re-write and disrupt the western European map of geopolitical influence, alliances and independence (Truman 344). Greece and Turkey asked for military and financial aid from the United States as Great Britain, their former benefactor, was no longer able, or in a position to, support the two struggling nations. The two countries would have fallen if not for the immediate financial support from the United States. (Truman, 1) While the Truman Doctrine only gave support to Greece…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    History Study Guide

    • 2231 Words
    • 9 Pages

    ­ the conflicting U.S. and soviet aims in Eastern Europe ­ the state of hostility…

    • 2231 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cold War Coursework

    • 1908 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Westwood poses his view that ‘wartime co-operation between the USSR and her allies was marred by friction’, separating Stalin from his occidental associates in the…

    • 1908 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In 1945 the war had been fought on one side by the nations of Great Britain, USA and USSR, the members of the Grand Alliance achieved victory in WW2. It was more important than ever the victorious powers remained united as they faced the enormous task of reconstructing war torn Europe. However, as they sought to do this, their unity was already weakened by the existence of mistrust and suspicions between them. Despite the outward appearance of unity, these nations were fundamentally divided by their ideological rivalry which had already existed between them since 1917: the disagreements and strains they experienced; and their competing aims and ambitions for the future of post-war Europe on which their societies were based. The fundamental struggle between the communist system of USSR and capitalist ideas of USA and Great Britain ideological rivalry is evident to be the most significant explanation for the existence of mistrust and suspicion between them. Due to the fact, it lies at the basis of the other casual factors.…

    • 1792 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Who Is Mr Putin A Hero

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the 1980’s Americans at home and millions of Russians living in the Soviet Union said U.S. President Ronald Reagan was a great communicator because he was the first to openly say the Soviet Union was an “evil empire” that must be defeated. However, in today’s Russia, a high percent of Russians regret the Soviet Union collapse which was so relentlessly pursued by the United States. Mr. Putin has called the empire’s break-up “A national tragedy of enormous scale.” This conflict made Mr. Reagan’s Presidency controversial, some saw him as a hero while others saw him as a zealot wanting all the power. People can be seen as a hero to some and a villain to others because of their actions and how they are perceived.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Problems of Post-war construction in Soviet foreign policy during World War 2’ in F. Gori and A. Pons (eds.), The Soviet Union and Europe in the Cold War, 1943-53, London, 1996, pp 8-11…

    • 2266 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bosnian Genocide

    • 1041 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia was not the perfect country. It had its faults but people in Yugoslavia were better off than people in other Communist countries. What Marshal Tito succeeded in doing was plain genius. He managed to unite 6 republics and many different ethnicities under one nation, and he managed to keep it running smoothly most of the time1. In 1950, economic control was given to each of the separate republics which helped start an economic boom. During the 1950s, employment doubled and unemployment fell to 6%. Even though more people were employed, wages still increased by more than 6%2. The Yugoslavian regime was more humane than other communist regimes in Easter Europe, however it wasn’t that liberal. The League of Communists of Yugoslavia (LCY) had all the power and was the only party in the country. The State Security Administration, which was the secret police, was a dreaded tool of the government and there are many cases of when Tito used the secret police to eliminate people who were becoming too nationalistic and threatened to destroy the peace in Yugoslavia3. Starting in the 70s, the LCY allied with many smaller nationalistic political parties to give more power to the individual parties. In 1971,…

    • 1041 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Genocide In Bosnia Essay

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages

    War in the Balkans broke out in the early 1990’s, after the Serb president Milosevic began his campaign of Serb national dominance. Prior to Milosevic’s secession of…

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the night of August 20-21, 1968, the joint forces of the Warszawa pact invaded Czechoslovakia. This was the largest activity in Europe since the Second world war as up to two hundred thousand troops from Russia, East Germany, Poland, Republic of Bulgaria and Republic of Hungary occupied Czechoslovakia in ‘Operation Danube’. Launched in response to the social movement led by Czechoslovakia leader Alexander Dubcek (known as the ‘Prague Spring’), the Warszawa accord invasion was preceded by many months of negotiation and preparation. As Jiri Valenta argues, the Soviet leadership determined to intervene in Czechoslovakia ‘only when an extended amount of hesitation and vacillation’.[1] throughout the course of 1968, the steady increase of Dubcek’s reform programme 1st worried and then alarmed Moscow, finally persuading Soviet leader Leonid Ilyich Brezhnev that Soviet interests were seriously compromised by the threat of ‘counter-revolution’ in Czechoslovakia. above all, Dubcek’s failure to reply to various warnings and ultimatums issued between April and August 1968 appears to have played an important role in influencing Brezhnev’s call to…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Communist Party in the 1920’s, Stalin’s Rise to Power and the Defeat of His Rivals.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays