Preview

Unethical Studies

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
283 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Unethical Studies
Brianna Hogan
Oct. 16, 2013
Psychology
Surgical Experiments
Throughout the 1840’s on the east coast of the United States, J. Marion Sims, “the father of Gynecology” performed surgical experiments on enslaved African women who were suffering from fistula problems, against their will, without any anesthesia. That is a very painful procedure to go through with unclean tools and no medicine to ease the pain. Only one out of thirty patients survived. In order to test one of his theories about the causes of trismus I infants he used shoemaker tools to move around skull bones in unborn babies. This is unethical because it killed many women and harmed their unborn babies. It was kind of like an abortion but not taking the baby out and not numbing you. He later perfected the experiment and then tried it on Caucasian women with anesthesia. This is not an experiment that can be repeated now because that is human cruelty. It took slaves because back then they were not considered people and it was ok. It is not fair that people had to go through these procedures with this “doctor”. Why didn’t anybody step in to stop what was going on before so many people died? It seems like the scientific world is much different from the real world because this would never happen in the real world. There are new guidelines that scientists have to follow in order to conduct an experiment. If medicine was given to these women before they went through with the procedure and it wasn’t against their will then it would be ok. Some scientists have taken the unethical studies to a whole new extreme and this is one of them.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Tuskegee Syphilis Study began in 1932 in Tuskegee, Alabama. The case was created by the United States Public Health Service, the objective was to analyze the natural course of untreated latent syphilis. The disease was injected into roughly 400 African American men without their consent. The men were misled of the promise “special free treatment”. Instead the “treatment” were spinal taps done without anesthesia to evaluate the neurological effects of the disease. It was morally wrong to test these men without permission and mislead them to false hope of an antibiotic.…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    These were far worse than just scraping off a few samples of tissue. Procedures like lobotomies and the Tuskegee experiments, deep sleep therapy and human radiation experiments are just some of the scandalous and unethical procedures and studies that proved far more dangerous to the members participating. Scientists did not explain what they were doing to their patients and used the people involved as guinea pigs. Exposing them to painful and lethal amounts of radiation and drugs, or infected a large population with diseases to understand how it worked its course, and perhaps how to cure…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This introduced one of the first ethical implications in this experiment which was withholding information to gain consent.The USPHS conducted a screening in search of infected participants. After they had chosen the few hundred men to be apart of the experiments they began to moved forward with the study. The doctors lured these men into the study by saying that they were ill and had "bad blood".It was never explained to them why they were really being chosen for this treatment. In order to ensure the interest of the blacks, they began performing noneffective treatments on them such as giving the mercurial ointment. Also, they even used African American health care workers to mislead patients into compliance. These men endured much pain and were enrolled in various treatments without their consent.The second ethical implication was the withholding of treatment. This was the worst charge that the researchers had committed. Even in (year) when penicillin had become the primary treatment for syphilis, this information was also withheld and men were prevented from getting treatment. Though Alabama passed a law in 1927 requiring the reporting and treatment of diseases, the USPHS failed to do so when it came to tending to these…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unlike something ever seen before, Henrietta’s cells were placed into a petri dish to see if they would grow, and they did. As a matter of fact they have yet to stop growing. Some would call it a medical miracle, and those that discovered it “Heroes of Modern Medicine”. Many would argue that scientists had the right to take Henrietta’s samples, after all Henrietta signed “a form”. Many would justify the doctor's actions and overlook misconduct or abuse of power as they neglected to inform Henrietta of their intentions in the name of medicine advancement. Yet, some would disagree. Henrietta was being treated for cancer, the form she signed was consent for treatment not for the removal and testing of her cells. The document clearly outlined its purpose, giving John Hopkins Hospital and staff permission to…”Perform any operative procedure, under anaesthetic either local or general that they may deem necessary in the proper surgical care and treatment of: Henrietta Lacks” (31).…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is because a human life is valued more than any other subject used in clinical trials. In order to ensure the efficacy and legitimacy of treatment, human subjects are the most accurate compared to animals. Human subjects cultivate concrete information and data necessary for the improvement of medicine and health care as a whole. Baillie, McGeehan, T.M. Garrett, and R.M. Garrett (2013) stated, “…human experimentation is necessary for medical progress. Animal testing is useful, but it cannot provide the final word on either safety or efficacy” (p. 300). On the contrary, this does not excuse the researcher from disregarding a clinical participant’s life and safety. According to Baillie et al. (2013), humans are not objects that are used however the researcher desires (p. 293). Human experimentation, conversely, has a long history of abuse. Many rules and guidelines have been set in place to prevent researchers from taking advantage of human subjects all in the name of “science”. Due to these unfortunate events, Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) have been established to protect and oversee the organization and conduction of human experimentation (Baillie et al., 2013). One historical event that led to the development of stringent biomedical experimentation rules and guidelines was the Tuskegee syphilis research experiment (Head, 2012). This experiment was widely acknowledged and is known as…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When conducting any kind of research study involving humans, basic rights play an important role throughout the course of the study. The first semester of classes for almost all medical professionals stresses the patient’s rights. According to Polit and Beck (2012), the Belmont Report focused mainly on the ethical standards of research which included “beneficence, respect for human dignity, and justice.” Beneficence basically means to do is good for the patient and is a way to protect the patient’s from harm. These essential standards of conduct for research were completely ignored or violated during the Tuskegee study. The patients involved in the study were not treated with respect. It was almost as if they were seen as subhuman by the researchers. When medication was available to treat, and actually cure, the condition it was withheld from these patients without reason or rationale. These patients were not thoroughly informed of the reason for the study nor were they educated on the effects of the disease would have on…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Comm 335

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In reading and doing some research on the subject above I believe that some of the ethical decisions of this case were that there was never an informed consent from the men that this study was conducted on. The participants were not informed of all the known dangers, participants had to agree to an autopsy after their death, in order to have their funeral costs covered, some patients were denied treatment so that scientists could observe the individual dangers and fatal progression of the disease, patients were not given the cure, even though it was easily available. The researchers advertised for participants with the slogan; "Last Chance for Special Free Treatment". This was a misleading advertisement and the participants were NOT given a treatment, instead being recruited for a very risky spinal tap-diagnostic. These participants were used as a form of a lab rat. They were unable to make rational decision because they were never provided all of the required information. The scientist who conducted this study was totally out of line. They choose to make decisions concerning others health and lives when they had not right to do so.…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment was started in the early 1930’s and continued on for over 40 years causing a great deal of physical and emotional health problems to thousands of black men and their families in Macon County, Georgia. Beneficence, according to The Belmont Report states, “Research involving human subjects should do no intentional harm, while maximizing possible benefits and minimizing possible harms, both to the individuals involved and to society at large” (National Institute of Health, 1979).…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the past, scientists have done very unwise and unimaginable experiments with humans as the test subject. Like in 1932, the public health service was working to find treatment for syphilis in the african american race.They had 600 black men, 399 with syphilis and 201 that did not have the disease. Without the patient's knowing that they were contracted with syphilis, scientists told the men that they were being treated for “bad blood”. But really they were not given the right treatment to cure their illness. Also in exchange the men received free medical exams, free meals, and burial insurance, which is like life insurance. But in 1968 this research raised concern for peter buxton and others, so they wrote a news article about what these…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tuskegee Syphilis Study

    • 2578 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Experimentations on humans have always been met with some degree of suspicion in America. Yet, history recalls several incidents which implicated well –established agencies that have been involved. One such embarrassing incident took place at Tuskegee. This is the story of “Miss Evers Boys.” It has come to symbolize racism in medicine, ethical misconduct in human research, paternalism by physicians and government abuse of vulnerable people.…

    • 2578 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jardine, C. (2011). GMC brands Dr Andrew Wakefield 'dishonest, irresponsible and callous '. Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/7095145/GMC-brands-Dr-Andrew-Wakefield-dishonest-irresponible-and-callous.html…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The international community is attempting to crack down on the issue. Doctors Against Forced Organ Harvesting has been charted as a contribution to mankind to protect ethical medical practices that further human dignity. The newly formed organisation aims to provide society and the medical community with objective findings of unethical and illegal organ harvesting. Forced organ harvesting and/or the removal of organs from a donor, without obtaining voluntary consent is considered to be one of the most barbaric forms of slavery and one of the greatest crimes against humanity, as well as a threat to medical science in…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tuskegee experiments are one of many times in science where ethics, morals, and simple fair treatment of human beings were completely neglected. The worst part of the “Tuskegee Syphilis Experiments” is that they were under the advisement of The United States Government. The Public Health Service began these experiments, which did not end until many years later. These experiments conducted on black men who suffered from syphilis. The PHS was interested to see what would happen to a man with syphilis if he went untreated.…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment was a fundamentally unethical research project that began in 1932 and lasted 40 years ("U.S. Public Health Service Syphilis Study at Tuskegee"). In the study, about 600 black men were told that they were being treated for “bad blood,” a colloquial term for syphilis (“U.S. Public Health”). In reality, the men were not being given any treatment and were merely acting as test subjects so that researchers from the U.S. Public Health Service could study the disease (“The Deadly Deception”). The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment clearly violated the ethical principles put forth in 1979 by the Belmont Report. The Belmont Report has three key components to protect the rights of human research participants: beneficence, autonomy, and justice.…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Medical Apartheid

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the book, Medical Apartheid, Harriet A. Washington touches on some major soft points, that really made me think and I believe that if many other people read this they would be surprised as well, because when she goes into detail about the cruel treating of African Americans in the past, it is just shocking to find out what we didn’t know. Basically, Medical Apartheid is the first and only comprehensive history of medical experimentation on African Americans. It begins with the earliest encounters between black Americans and Western medical researchers and the racist pseudoscience that resulted, it talks about the way that both, slaves and freedmen were used in hospitals for experiments conducted without their knowledge, a tradition that continues today within some black populations. It reveals how blacks have historically been prey to grave-robbing as well as unauthorized autopsies and dissections. Moving into the present times, it shows how the pseudoscience of eugenics and social Darwinism was used to justify experimental exploitation and shoddy medical treatment of blacks, and the view that they were biologically inferior, oversexed, and unfit for adult responsibilities. Shocking new details about the government’s notorious Tuskegee experiment are revealed, as are similar, less-well-known medical atrocities conducted by the government, the armed forces, prisons, and private institutions. It also talked about the Tuskegee Experiment which was the most shocking out of all of it. The Tuskegee Experiment was a study that began in 1932; Investigators enrolled in the study 399 impoverished African-American sharecroppers from Macon County, Ala., infected with syphilis. For participating in the study, the men were given free medical exams, free meals and free burial insurance. They were never told they had syphilis, nor were they ever treated for it. According to the book, Medical Apartheid, the men were told they were being treated for…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays