Unilever is an international conglomerate consisting of over 400 brands in several different markets. From creating brands to mergers with other companies, Unilever is dominating many markets by offering thousands of products to different consumers. This research will discuss the history, market segmentation, and the target markets of Unilever.…
BMF consulting has evaluated the structure of Global Household Brands, in order to give recommendations for possible growth and stability for the future of the company. In this analysis, I have gathered information regarding financial statements, internal and external factors in Global Household Brands competitive structure, and strategic priorities in order for the company to grow in the household product industry.…
4. What price, product, promotion, and distribution strategy would allow Unilever to deliver value to low-income consumers without cannibalizing its own premium brands too heavily?…
From its genesis Unilever adopted a dual company structure i.e. having two headquarters, one in London (Unilever PLC) and the other in Rotterdam (Unilever NV) which shared a common board of directors with a citizen from each headquarters as the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the organization. By 1930 the United Africa Company (UAC), a company that had a very strong position in Western Africa in export-import trade merged with Unilever. The two parent companies owned factories and trading subsidiaries in Asia and Africa. Unilever in the early years from 1909 to 1933 built and also purchased factories in Japan, Argentina, Brazil, Thailand, Indonesia and India. Between 1945 and 1980 they expanded their activities in mostly Western Europe and the product line in those early years were margarine and soap products until Unilever began to diversify into new areas in the market into the food sector - frozen foods, transport, chemicals and printing. However, Unilever’s food sector remained predominantly a Western European company. (Elshof, 2005)…
The main issue of the P&G Korea case is centered around the question of market share. P&G and Unilever are the two major market shareholders in the Korean detergent industry holding 80-85% of the total market share. The remaining 15-20% of the market is held by low-priced local Korean brands. There are no new markets either company can tap for further market share since most Korean households already use laundry detergent, making the market saturated. Other than peripheral chemical changes claimed to be “improvements”, there are no major innovations to be explored for product development or diversification. Per Ansoff’s strategic opportunities matrix, P&G and Unilever are both focused on Market Penetration, working to increase their prospective shares of the Korean detergent market.…
The goal of Unilever Brazil is to target the low income consumers, in order to gain market share among this segment they should develop an extension of Minerva brand with a small packaging and a cheaper formulation that maintains a good quality.…
The economic upturn by Plano Real brought the higher purchasing power for consumers in the Brazil and this has made the detergent powder market grow at 17%. In the detergent powder market, Unilever has three products, OMO, Minerva and Campeiro. While OMO and Minerva are perceived to have good quality and grasp substantial share in the market, Campeiro is perceived to be low-quality product, so Campeiro has just 6% market share. Unilever is concerned that its competitor like P&G may gain the substantial market share in low-income market, threatening Unilever’s detergent business in Brazil. In the short term launching new product helps Unilever expand its market share in low income market and boost up its sales and profit, and in the long term this will let the company be market leader in low-income market in the Northeast Brazil.…
According to the Unilever Brazil case, Unilever already had an 81% share of the Brazil detergent market which far exceeds than its strong competitor Procter& Gamble’s 15% share. However, it is facing a real threat that P&G Brazil may draw on worldwide R&D and marketing expertise is closing up and will attack in low-income segment in the Northeast of Brazil. What’s more, there is no other way to expand Unilever Brazil in detergent market and growing number of small local brands targeted at low-income consumers simultaneously. Within the increasing usage of detergent powder, as a result, focusing on the low-income consumers in the Northeast of Brazil gives another way to boost Unilever’s market share.…
By contrast, laundry soap market, with no giant competitors, is where Unilever can steal market share from. As shown in Exhibit 1 and 2, the targeted customers are low-income northeast Brazil people, and they do washing manually. They mostly scrub clothes using bars of laundry soap because of lower price and only add a little detergent powder at the end primarily to make the clothes smell good. If the new detergent powder can satisfy them with low price, good smell, and keep the function of soap that is stains removing and dissolve power, it’s very likely that they will switch to detergent powder from soap. In addition, as an extension of OMO, one of Brazil’s top brands, strong ability of stains removing, OMO Scrub can more easily attract target customers than having a new brand. By doing so, it’s not likely to cannibalization because the targeted customer groups have big gap of price preference.…
Unilever is a multi-national consumer goods company. Its products include total wellness from food and drink to personal hygiene and care products. It has won numerous awards, is one of the top three consumer goods companies and is the face of a company which has embellished the new age of digital media. Its products and marketing strategies have become known world-wide because of Unilever's constant dedication and connection to its consumers through the use of combining marketing tactics of the past, present as well as trying to predict the future.…
February 19, 2006 Unilever Unilever House, Blackfriars London EC4P 4BQ, United Kingdom Sent Via Electronic Mail RE: Strategy Analysis Ladies and Gentlemen: At the request of the Board of Directors of Unilever, we provide herein our analysis of the Personal Products Industry and a strategy analysis of both Unilever and its biggest competitor, Procter & Gamble. The enclosed analysis also provides recommendations for Unilever to improve its competitive advantage.…
Unilever is the company in which this assignment is going to be based on. I chose this company because I’ve been following its growth and development in Portugal for the last few years. This because a member of my family has been working in this company for the last three years and that triggered my interest in such a company. It amazed me how big the company is and how come hadn’t I heard about it before, I actually found out that most of the food (including margarine, beverages, ice creams, etc.) and cleaning products I had at home had that unique “U” printed in the back of the pack.…
As the company continued to grow, they faced tough competition from local sweet and snack food vendors in the unorganized market. Their Unique Selling Proposition (USP) against the unorganised sector was the level of hygiene and product quality they maintained without any compromise in taste. This resulted in a shift of the utility curve towards the right, whereby consumers got a higher level of satisfaction, by consuming products from a bigger brand which believed in far better hygienic procedures (Ref graph). With this in mind, they evolved a competitive pricing strategy to survive and grow in the market dominated by smaller players.…
• • • • • • Established on Dec 5, 1933 Focus on Home & Personal Care and Food & Ice Cream Products Home & Personal Care Portfolio in 2011 comprises 27 wellknown brands Portfolio Food & Ice Cream in 2011 is 16 Brands Received 68 awards in 2011 Strong distribution network more than 400 independent distributors covering more than 600,000 outlets throughout Indonesia Market capture 40% of Indonesian market share…
Unilever formed in 1930 when Dutch Margarine Company “Margarine Unie” merged with Lever Brothers. Both of the companies were competing for the same raw materials and were involved in producing marketing products in large scale. They both used the similar type of distribution channel. They together had operations in more than 40 countries…