Preview

Unit 61 Assignment 1

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1524 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Unit 61 Assignment 1
Exercise #61

Item #1
Tom,
I would like to have a meeting with yourself and your supervisor to review the evaluation. Are you available on Friday at 10:00 am?
Sincerely,
Jane Smith
HR Department
Additional Action:
I will email Tom Morrison’s boss and discuss the evaluation with him. I hope that in my discussion I will discover that he has set forth a course of action to discus training and performance goals with this employee in achieving a stronger performance review in the future. (Mathis, Robert, et al. pg. 357) I will be sure to discuss with him the dangers of rating patterns and contrast errors. It is important that the reviewers understand that they should steer clear of rating employees against each other and stick to rating employees
…show more content…
To help support this matter in the future, we have reviewed our performance evaluation and decided to add some additional criteria to our evaluations. These changes will be covered in an upcoming meeting with all managers and supervisors. You should receive an additional email in the next month with a date for this meeting.
Sincerely,
Jane Smith
HR Department Additional Action:
Review the evaluation. I would take this scenario and also present it to the executive managers in my meeting. I would suggest that a narrative method be added to the evaluation so that managers can use critical incidents to support their rating. (pg 355) This would help an employee to accept the constructive criticism given because there are supporting facts to be given.
Item #6
Howard,
Now that Harold has had some time to absorb the information, meet with him again and see if he will sign the evaluation. If he still refuses, call a third party into the meeting and have them be a witness that Harold agrees with the evaluation. His signature will no longer be needed, as you will have a witness signature.
Sincerely,
Jane
…show more content…
Item #10
It is against our company policy for an supervisor to discuss employee evaluations with third parties. I would like to have a meeting with Helen, her supervisor and yourself to further discuss this situation and reveal all the facts.
Sincerely,
Jane Smith
HR Department
Additional Action:
I would call in Helen Jackson’s supervisor and see if she is aware of the situation. We would discuss the common law deformation that is at stake and the potential for a lawsuit with Jeff. If Helen did communicate to other employees about false reports of Jeff’s performance, it could harm his reputation and cause unfair results. (Van Bogaerd) We would then conduct a meeting with Helen and Jeff to gather the facts related to the case. If Helen is found guilty, she will be reprimanded up to or including termination according to our policy.

References:

Mathis, Robert, et al. Human Resource Management (14th edition). Cengage Learning. Stamford. CT. 2014. Print.

Society for Human Resource Management. Performance Management: What if an employee refuses to sign a performance warning or evaluation? December 12, 2012. Reference. SHRM.org. Web. 27 Oct.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    1. Performance evaluations- The employee evaluations are not a complete review of the employee and they are not very honest. The evaluation forms lack detail and information; they are vague.…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cango Week 6

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2. Another idea is a peer review, which would have everyone in the office fill out a review for each other but not put their name on the top. Then the person giving the review can put these together and get a better feel for how the people that work with the employee each day think they are doing.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It has been brought to my attention that due to the recent downsizing of the company, People.com, and the subsequent layoffs, there are some questions regarding employee reviews and how they are interpreted. I have reevaluated the review process and I feel that the supervisors are not accurately measuring the employees' performances and need to be trained on the proper ways to complete the company reviews. There are many problems that can arise when a supervisor completes a performance review. In this training proposal, I will outline a few of the problems and make suggestions to correct and implement them.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    BUS 303 Week 3 Assignment

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The performance appraisal, when properly carried out, can help to fine tune and reward the performance of present employees. Strengths of the negotiated performance appraisal are its ability to promote candid two-way communication between the supervisor and the person being appraised and to help the latter take more responsibility for improving performance. In contrast, in the traditional performance appraisal, the supervisor acts more as a judge of employee…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A manager rating an employee more severely than their work performance merits will create a frustrated and disgruntled employee. Workers will resent the unfair assessment of their performance. The opposite is also true, if a manager rates an employee more favourably than their performance merits “cheats them and the department of the benefits of exploring areas for improvement and the opportunities for developing and coaching” (MacKenzie, 2013)…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All employees want a fair and accurate performance evaluation. It’s it important that an evaluation reflect each employee’s job duties and how well they have performed. In this scenario, the engineer’s first performance review ended with him being angry over the way in which he was being evaluated. There were three main issues with the engineer’s evaluation. The engineer felt that no one in the company, including the plant manager was qualified to complete his annual review. He felt this way because he is the only trained engineer in the company. As a result, the engineer had little confidence in the way that he was being evaluated and was upset that most of his review was based on relationships with other co-workers and his own personal characteristics. For the second annual review the plant manager is exploring other options when it comes to evaluating the engineer.…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Week 4 Team D

    • 538 Words
    • 2 Pages

    All of the group members reach the same conclusions as far as the importance of evaluating, assessing, and delivering feedback. Team D came to a consensus that constant communication and the value of feedback where the most key points in our plans . We also discuss the job analysis process and the importance of determining what each position entails. Because we know from our readings in class and what we have researched, the employee needs to know exactly what is expected from them in their job position in order to succeed. If you want the employee’s performance to excel, they must receive clear and concise directions. This week, team D reviewed the requirements for performance management, define performance, facilitate performance and encourage performance. Team D also discussed how we could approach these three requirements. After bouncing several ideas off each other, we concluded to define the performance by the job analysis,…

    • 538 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though performance appraisals can be good for the organization, it can also be a controversial management tool. Critics of performance appraisals have many compelling arguments against its use. They can have a false degree of accuracy, engenders dysfunctional employee conflict and competition, assigns an inordinate amount of responsibility to individual with poor work performance. Many will argue that these negative effects of appraisal can be fixed through genuine employee participation.…

    • 854 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to our policies and procedures at my organization, the process for performance evaluation for employees, excluding faculty and MDs, is that each employee will have a 90 day evaluation from the date of hire and then annual evaluations. Annual evaluations must be completed within 30 days of an employee’s review date. The completed performance evaluation must be reviewed and approved by the next highest official to the rating supervisor. Employees must be allowed 30 days to make a formal request for reconsideration for their performance evaluation. The employee must sign the form stating that they have discussed the rating with the supervisor. They must also receive a copy whether they agree or disagree. Although this is the policy, it is not always followed. Evaluations…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unit 3 Individual Project

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Dessler, G. (2008). Human Resource Management (11 ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hal.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The following paper will give valuable information regarding performance appraisal. It will also give example of personal experience with evaluations. Next the strengths and weaknesses of the evaluation process will be incorporated into the paper. Lastly strategies to improve the performance appraisal process in your workplace for a more positive experience in the future.…

    • 579 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cango Week 6 Analysis

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Employee assessments are vital to the success of a business. They allow you to give praise for a job well done as well as point out areas in the job performance that are in need of improvement. For the good of both the employee and the business it is imperative to have these assessments on a regular basis. As much as possible, you want to make sure that the employee’s assessment is a thorough review of their job performance; this will allow you to clearly see where there has been improvement and what areas in their training are still behind. TBC Consulting has identified that CanGo would benefit from an improvement to their employee performance assessment. An improved method for performing these assessments will help CanGo communicate more effectively with its staff and further encourage growth for the employee and the company.…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unfortunately, there are situations in which supervisors have to deal with difficult employees and some employees have called out the report line about their supervisors. However, when it is time for evaluating employee’s performances, supervisors might feel tempted to inflate their rating because they are afraid that if they give them a lower rate is because they are retaliating. Most of the supervisors prefer to give an intentional rating inflation and keep their jobs than given a rate that can end up losing their jobs. Moreover, unintentional rating inflation can occur when supervisors have to evaluate a group of employees in a giving time just to fulfill their deadlines (Aguinis,…

    • 111 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Heet, L. (2007). Guide to performance appraisals, [Conduct performance reviews to help you employees reach their potential].. Retrieved February 21, 2008, from http://www.work.com/performance-appraisal-2303/…

    • 3767 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Conducting a performance appraisal is an important part of evaluating the abilities of staff members. Performance appraisals are “structured events involving a periodic examination of performance to ascertain how well a particular employee is performing relative to what is expected” (Fallon & McConnell, 2007, p 221). Performance appraisals can assist both management and subordinates in setting expectations and understanding roles and polices. In addition to these benefits it is also a mandate of many health care organizations that old certain accreditation standards and must be conducted to uphold compliance. There are many different systems that can be utilized to conduct performance evaluations and each facility should use the system that fits them best. The performance appraisal process can consist of an essay, a critical incident, employee comparison, a checklist, or management by objectives and regardless of the system used employees and management should both be on the same page as the expectations of what is to be achieved by the appraisal. I work at M. D. Anderson Cancer Center and we conduct performance evaluations in November. Our evaluation process is conducted by utilizing a 360 model, where employees evaluate themselves and are in turn evaluated by their co-workers and superiors. Employees are evaluated on their use of the core values in their everyday practices as well as communication skills and safety standards. A formal evaluation review interview is conducted and employees are given the opportunity to discuss their evaluations with their supervisors and a final evaluation number is decided upon. Employees are evaluated on a five point scale Outstanding, Exceeds, Achieves, Met, Not Met. Upon completion employees are asked to sign evaluations and management then determines the level of compensation an employee will be given based on their evaluation score. I personally like this type of evaluation…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays