Preview

Unjust and Unfair Society

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
585 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Unjust and Unfair Society
Unjust and Unfair Society
We live in a world with freedom of speech and everyone is said to be treated equally. We have the Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence which protects us. Even with that I believe that our society is not fair and just; as well as not as democratic as we like to believe. Thomas Jefferson, Cady Stanton, and John Rawls has different prospective of what a just society is. There are many phenomena that leads to the democracy’s potential for a lesser democratic institutions. In fact, using John Rawls’ Theory of Justice, our society is unjust and unfair because of unequal education, unequal distributions of taxes and unequal applications of laws.
Rawls theory goes up against utilitarianism. Utilitarianism argues that justice is that which brings the most happiness or goodness to the biggest amount of people. Rawls had two purposes for his justice theory. They were to define the appropriate distribution of the benefits and burdens and provide a way of assigning rights and duties in the basic institutions of society. A right would be something a person has such as, the right to free speech or the right to practice a religion. These rights can be considered benefits. Rawls says that justice entails providing a way of assigning rights and duties in basic institutions. The way we provide these rights are through voting. Rawls values a system that creates a fair and just society without bias towards those who have a big say in creating it.

Our system is only distantly related to Rawls theory of justice. In my opinion, individuals and particularly politicians are very aware of their place in society and make most of their decisions on governmental issues based on furthering those personal goals and ambitions. Most all decisions that are made in the political arena are made with an eye toward self-advancement by those making them.
In today’s society, everyone is given a chance to go to school, but it doesn’t necessarily mean that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In many societies, including our own, we labeled the meaning of the word “justice” for the sole purpose of maintaining social and political stability and order for the good of many instead of the few. However, what we believe to be just and unjust in regards to what Plato’s Republic explains about what is actually just and unjust are inadvertently blurred from a somewhat conflicting (if not unintended biased) perspective. These concepts of thought originate in a hierarchical group of knowledge: understanding, thought, belief, and imagination (Socrates 511e); most of which we use for measuring the ideal implementation of practical and critical forms of theory. What we portray justice in the United States today mostly consists of both opinionated…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Larry Cuban, a former social studies high school teacher, superintendent, manages to compress the mantra that has been repeated for several of years with his article entitled, “Why Everyone Shouldn’t Go To College”. He accomplishes this by giving us countless of interesting facts about the reality of college and life. He argues that the annual college tuition seems to be extremely expensive, that may not worth the amount of money you’re paying.In addition, he makes note that college graduates working at manufacturing places that don’t need college diplomas, in order to complete their job. Furthermore, he makes clear that one might be a high school dropout or graduate of high school and can still be highly…

    • 117 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Society fails to include the extremities of life and its circumstances when considering a person’s value. Not having the opportunity to continue school is very common. One example is Rose’s mother who had to “quit school in the seventh grade to help raise her brothers and sisters” (98). Another example is of my parents who were born in another country and who did not have the level of formal education past high school. This made it very challenging for my parents to go to school because they had many varied responsibilities, including going to work to the family. Another example is my friend Catherine who gave birth to her first newborn, who also watched her father pass away two months before her son’s birthdate. These life-changing events influenced her inability to afford time and money for college. All these people are deemed less intelligent because they do not fit the given model for society to judge them…

    • 1591 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States Pledge of Allegiance is an honorable and commendable mantra. It concludes with, “one nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all.” Justice in the former reference is inclusive for everyone, an entitlement, granted upon birth. John Rawls position of justice is that “everyone should be treated equally and as fair as possible”. Mr. Rawls position parallels the Egalitarian theory of equality and mutual respect. This isn’t necessarily the practice because contrary to the hope for multiple factors are factored in to the outcome.…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Theories of justice are also referred to in the article. These theories utilize concepts by John Rawls which include ideas on how to “create an environment of opportunity and access by all to the most comprehensive range of prospects” (Colin, 2012, p. 444). This theory can lead to a society where individuals are given opportunities to succeed.…

    • 1775 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The thought experiment offers a way of deducing just principles that free and rational persons would choose if they were not able to know what position they would occupy in life. The principles are chosen behind a veil of ignorance that prevents the participants from knowing particular information about themselves. Rawls believes this would lead to fair results as participants are unable to choose principles that they can profit from. Rawls argues that the rational persons, behind the veil of ignorance, would give priority to the Liberty Principle which means that "each person is to have an equal right to the most extensive total system of equal basic liberties compatible with a similar system of liberty for all". Participants would choose a second principle which stipulates that social and economic inequalities are justifiable if they satisfy two conditions: they are arranged so that they are both to the greatest possible benefit of the least advantaged, which is known as the Difference Principle; and that positions and offices are open to all under the conditions of fair equality of…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rawls Summary

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rawls first begins with discussing how we are lead to the original position. The original position is a hypothetical argument that considers a society where people do not decide what is right or wrong based on a higher power or emotion, but rather on common sense. These ideas establish justice or fairness simply based on the community’s beliefs that they create. However, these agreements cannot be made without the “veil of ignorance.” This means that all instances that would create a distortion of views must be ruled out. Thus, the people discussing what the rules will be cannot have any information about the other individual, or the society’s position. The hypothetical argument is contingent on all things being fair and equal, which means that all people involved in crating the beliefs must be free of any preconceived ideas. Another part of the equality of this situation is that every member of a society, including the minority, must be treated fairly. Rawls stated that every citizen had basic liberties and human rights that must be protected. He believed that societies need to protect the least advantaged citizen in order to be successful. We determine which citizens are least advantaged based on if they possess primary goods. Primary goods are what is needed to be a functioning and contributing member of society. These things are not necessarily monetary, but rather on psychological capabilities, historical facts, social capabilities, as well as, moral abilities being free and equal. Rawls believe that the five most important primary goods that determine advantage are basic rights and liberties, freedom to choose, responsibility, income and self respect. These things can make this hypothetical a reality and a society fair as equals.…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A social institution is a system in our society that has sets of statuses, roles, and groups that makes a society function. These institutions have a common group of people that come together to complete some common goal. These institutions have sets of norms and structures that support society's success. Just like in any set of groups or roles in our society, there is institutional injustice. Institutional injustice is different from other forms of injustice because these institutions have injustice in their statuses and roles in them. For example, In the nine states Petrella examined, private facilities housed higher percentages of people of color than public facilities did. (Palta). The criminal…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As citizens we should follow the laws that supports one another. On the other hand, some laws in America are unjustified. It seem like some laws just want to keep people under control and not free . I truly believe if every citizen in America follow the law without problems the government will control our lives like puppets.…

    • 196 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Theory of Justice

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Rawls goes on to decide the necessary principles of justice that a good society may be based upon and using these as a foundation to build from. There were three principles addressed in the theory. The first principle addressed is the principle of the greatest equal liberty. This means each person is to have an…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe that Americans have a choice whether they want to stand up for others or to stay neutral, we are not required to fight the battle of others but in my opinion we should help others in need. If you don’t stand up for justice of all people you are technically letting it happen but it doesn’t mean you support injustice or propose it upon others. If you see injustice happening what do you do? Do you step in or do you let it go? I think it depends on the situation, if it is someone that can’t fend for themselves then yes I believe you should step in, if someone is harming another to better themselves someone should step in.…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The issue of distributive justice is relevant in our society due to current thoughts on economic inequality in politics. The political philosophers John Rawls and Robert Nozick have differing views when it comes to the topic of distributive justice. This analyze the positions of John Rawls and Robert Nozick, finding that Nozick’s view of distribution is preferable to Rawls’ difference principle because people deserve to keep what they earn and their earnings should not be taken away from them because that would be a violation of their personal liberties.…

    • 1823 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unjust Justice

    • 1794 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The 14th amendment of Constitution of the United States grants every American Citizen the right of due process of the law. This right is being denied juveniles sentenced to “life without parole”. Recent Supreme Court rulings have held that “life without parole” is cruel and unjust punishment for those juveniles sentenced for non-homicidal crimes, because of limited capacity. Life without parole is essentially cruel and unjust punishment for all juveniles sentenced, regardless of crime committed.…

    • 1794 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Rawls Vs Nozick

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Both John Rawls and Robert Nozick have made major contributions to modern political philosophy. Rawls’ most successful philosophical work, “A Theory of Justice,” has helped construct both modern liberal and social democratic concepts of social justice. On the other hand, “Anarchy, State, and Utopia”, Nozick’s most successful philosophical work, constructs a form of libertarianism traditionally associated with John Locke and other philosophers prescribed to individual rights and freedoms. Evidently, both philosophers exhibit two highly distinct political philosophies. One major difference between the two philosophies is the legitimacy of governmental redistribution of wealth. As a result, Rawls and Nozick are at two opposite ends of the political…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Student Debt

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Education is a luxury that many cannot afford. If you want to study, you have to pay for it. Once the poor knew their place and it wasn't in the classroom. Today that no longer applies. We are told we have a choice and that education is freely available.…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays