While at the Council of Clermont, the pope made this encouraging speech full of exaggerations about the Turks and what they were doing to Jerusalem to all that were in attendance (Ancient History). The pope encouraged all of the Christians with the exception of women, elderly, the feeble, and clergy (unless they had permission) to launch a crusade to take back the holy land in the name of GOD (The Council). In exchange for their service to the Lord our God, Pope Urban II made the following promises to those that chose to go on this endeavor: the absolution of their sins and everlasting life in heaven for their ultimate sacrifice (Ancient History). He asked those at the council to spread his…
The author, Baldric of Dol, was a French Christian bishop. The bishop is most famous for his work, the History of Jerusalem, which accounts the First Crusade. This source provides a description of Pope Urban’s declaration to retake Jerusalem in 1095. Urban stated to all Roman Catholics in the West that the primary goal was to recapture the Holy Land in the East. Although not being a direct transcript, Dol’s account conveys the major points made by the Pope for the Roman Catholics throughout Western Europe. With this, the History of Jerusalem is a vital source for the First Crusade. In respect to historical context, recognizing Dol’s glorification of what the Pope said is crucial. It may not be a direct transcript, but its accuracy can be confirmed from comparison with…
Religious enthusiasm had spread from France to Northern Britain and other areas of the west at that time. Along with the expansion of extremely devout races such as the Normans came the spread of the pope’s influence across Europe. Christians were anxious to demonstrate their faith, and the crusade provided the perfect opportunity to combine the interests of the pope with the purposes of the lay people of Christendom. The ardent religious factor was one of many of the Christians’ show of faith. It was fulfilling what they felt as a religious duty, but also love and charity which was a part of being a Christian. Another was the idea of “punishing evil” which was the underlying reason for the crusade. And of course, the promise of the many “sin reprieves” promised by Urban II for the participants. In addition, the traditions of pilgrimages and Holy Wars were not new. Pilgrimages had been established long before with the idea of going to shrines and holy places as a show of the peoples’ faith. Pilgrimage was regarded as the primary method for the articulation of faith and…
As the crusades began, Christians gathered to hear the insightful speech given by Pope Urban II in which he was able take unruly knights and give them a common enemy to fight. The enemies were the Muslims and Turks who were attacking the Byzantine Empire and the Holy Land. Urban II’s speech gave insights to the knightly class who were engaging in warlike tendencies and encouraged them to help people in need.…
In March of 1095, the Byzantine emperor Alexius I Comnenus appealed to the papacy for military aid to help against increasingly hostile neighbours. In 1095 the Seljuk Turks had come within one hundred miles of Byzantium or Constantinople, and they were thought to be threatening Eastern Christians. It was at this point that Alexius summoned the pope’s help to rid the area of the ‘pagans’. It was Alexius’ call for help which provided Urban with a stable reason for launching the crusade.…
European crusades to the eastern Mediterranean from 1095-1291 CE were a series of violent encounters between Christians and Muslims over control of certain lands. These crusades had a number of consequences, but perhaps more than anything else they brought many more Europeans than ever before into close contact with Muslims. Through this, Europeans learn more than ever before about these Muslims they were in contact with: both positively and negatively. Through Joinville’s account of the sixth and seventh crusades in The Life of Saint Louis, we are informed about a few of the things that the crusaders learned from their direct contact with these Muslims, or ‘Saracens’ as Joinville calls them.…
In a final attempt to get Christians to fight under his control, Pope Urban II says all Christians will be attacked, including Pilgrims and Latin Christians. Therefore the Pope felt it was vital that he and his army protected the Christians, especially Pilgrims on their sacred journey. This would be very important in convincing Christians to help him as they often went on pilgrimages to Jerusalem to go and visit the Holy Sepulchre, and would therefore feel obliged to help the Pope. For the Crusade to take place certain criteria had to be met; the Crusade had to be called by ‘legitimate authority’ for the ‘right intention’. These criteria were met as the Pope was calling the crusade to defend Christians and Christian property.…
For many years the point has been argued by historians as to whom to give credit for initiating The First Crusade. Some individuals might say that Peter the Hermit is responsible. However, historians agree that Pope Urban II 's speech at the Council of Clermont initiated the First Crusade and influenced the people and events in the battles.…
In 1095, Pope Urban II at the Council of Clermont made a plea to those present that the French, “to whom God has given above other nations outstanding glory in arms, greatness of spirit, fitness of body and the strength to humiliate the hairy scalp of those who resist you” should “set out on the road to the Holy Sepulchre, deliver that land from a wicked race and take it yourselves”. This was the beginning of the First Crusade. In this paper I will compare the accounts of the fall of Jerusalem and the battle of Ascalon in the early chronicle texts of Robert of Reims’ History of the First Crusade (Historia Iherosolimitana) with that of Ibn al-Athir. Robert, known as Robert the Monk, was likely a Benedictine Monk from the influential French city of Reims. According to his writing, Robert personally attended the Council of Clermont and was asked by his abbot to chronicle the history of the First Crusade. Although it is unclear whether Robert was an eyewitness to the other events included in his History of the First Crusade, Robert’s chronicle became one of the most popular versions of the First Crusade in Europe during the Middle Ages. By contrast Ibn al-Athir was an Arab historian that was born sixty years after the First Crusade. However al-Athir, as an Historian, compiled an important work detailing the history of the world (to that time) from a Muslim perspective and undoubtedly read and studied eyewitness accounts of the First Crusade.…
While there is no official account of the words spoken at the Sermon of Pope Urban II, there are five versions that depict the same common themes he addressed to noblemen and clergy, which then spread. Looking at Fulcher of Chartres’s version, a French monk and historian of the First Crusade, one of Urban II’s approaches of captivating his audience was by urging the people to help put a stop to the persecution of their Christian brothers living in the East. In this speech he calls out, “Freshly quickened by the divine correction, you must apply the strength of your righteousness to another matter which concerns you as well as God. For your brethren who live in the east are in urgent need of your help, and you must hasten to give them the aid which has often been promised them.” Medieval Europeans were comfortable with the idea of fighting for family members, and this helped form the idea that fighting and killing is not sinful as long as it is promoting greater peace.…
Circa 1100 A.C.E. Pope Urban II makes makes one of the most influential speeches of religion during the Middle Ages. He orders all the Christians to fight the Muslims to take back the Holy Land. Pope Urban II made a huge religious impact during the middle ages by fueling the hate against muslims, guaranteeing a path to heaven, and giving the Church more power. There was already mistrust between the Christians and Muslims.…
The months which followed the Council of Clermont were marked by an epidemic of religious excitement in western Europe. Popular preachers everywhere took up the cry "God wills it!" and urged their hearers to start for Jerusalem. A monk named Peter the Hermit aroused large parts of France with his passionate eloquence, as he rode from town to town, carrying a huge cross before him and preaching to vast crowds. Without waiting for the main body of nobles, which was to assemble at Constantinople in the summer of 1096 a horde of poor men, women, and children set out, unorganized and almost unarmed, on the road to the Holy Land. This was called the Peoples Crusade, it is also referred to as the Peasants Crusade. Dividing command of the mixed multitudes with a poor knight, called Walter the Penniless, and followed by a throng of about 80,000 persons, among whom were many women and children, Peter the Hermit set out for Constantinople leading the Peoples Crusade via an overland route through Germany and Hungary.…
In the first Crusade, Muslim armies were taking over parts of the Byzantine Empire and now the Seljuk Turks had posed as a serious threat to the ancient capital of Constantinople. Emperor Alexius had sent a message to Pope Urban the second for assistance in protecting pilgrims and the future of his empire. Both these incidents illustrate how political gain had played a part in the beginning of the Crusades. Despite the Crusades have been started by the prospect of political gain and economic benefits, it was not as significant as the religious devotion displayed by individuals. On the other hand, men went on Crusades to relieve their state of poverty. The quote of “There were others who were oppressed by debts to other men or who sought to escape the service of their lords” highlights the economic benefit of going on the Crusade as Crusaders would be able to be relieved from the burden of having to repay back their debts. However this was supported by a hostile view of the Second Crusade, which meant that sections were exaggerated. Despite the Crusades have been started by the prospect of political gain and economic benefits, it was not as significant as the religious devotion displayed by…
In Pope Urban II’s Call for the First Crusade Pope Urban is calling for Christians to fight in the name of God. The reason being that in the Middle East the Turks and Arabs were persecuting the Christians. The invaders killed and captured the Christians, and destroyed the churches. The Call for the Crusade was a result of a request sent by Emperor Alexios I Komnenos to Pope Urban in 1095. The Emperor asked of the Pope for aid against further invasions. In return for fighting in the Crusade, the Pope promised all who died, by land or by sea, or against the pagans, would have immediate remission of his sins. The remission of sin was a driving factor and provided any God-fearing man who had committed sins with an irresistible way out of eternal damnation in hell.…
When Pope Urban II received a petition from the Byzantine Emperor Alexius for military aid to repel the threat of Islam, particularly the Muslim Turks, he saw an opportunity to repair the Great Schism of forty years and unite the church under papal primacy.1 Europe at this time was not only fervently Christian, but its knights, although they regarded bloodshed as inherently sinful, consistently delved into violence and killing.2 It is therefore clear to see, when Pope Urban insisted that fighting in what would be known as the First Crusade would be a penitential act at the Council of Clermont in 1095, why there was so much enthusiasm and widespread support. Alexius probably expected no more than a token force, but the extent of support rendered the Byzantine Empire to be ‘overrun by Humankind’ according to Asbridge.3 The First Crusade was an undoubted success; creating four Crusader States in Outremer against the odds. However roughly one hundred years later a unified Muslim force under Saladin took Jerusalem and the following two crusades were comparatively utter failures. It is thus important to analyse and compare the both the continually fluctuating levels of Muslim unity and the changing mentality of the Franks to determine why and how the First Crusade achieved so much more than the two that followed.…