According to an article in the Journal of Family practice by William A. Alto, Screening for gestational diabetes using urine dipsticks for glycosuria is ineffective with low sensitivities. False-positive tests outnumber true positives 11:1. A 50-g oral glucose challenge is a better test. Tests for glycosuria after this blood test are not useful. Proteinuria determined by dipstick in pregnancy is common and a poor predictor for preeclampsia with a positive predictive value between 2% and 11%. If the blood pressure is elevated, a more sensitive test should be used. After urinalysis at the first prenatal visit, routine urine dipstick screening should be stopped in low-risk women. Urinalysis can be a quick and reliable indicator for some conditions such as UTI, dehydration and malnourishment (ketonuria). However in the case of gestational diabetes and pre eclampsia, urinalysis is a poor indicator, and any positive outcomes need to be followed up by further
References: www.ihs.gov/medicalprograms/mch/m/.../urinprenat9405.doc Noreen Murray, Caroline S E Homer, Gregory K Davis, Julie Curtis, George Mangos and Mark A Brown 2002, MJA, ‘The clinical utility of routine urinalysis in pregnancy: a prospective study’ MJA 2002; vol177: pp.477-480 Urinalysis By Dipstick For Proteinuria - 3centres Collaboration. 2012. Urinalysis By Dipstick For Proteinuria - 3centres Collaboration. [ONLINE] Available at: http://3centres.com.au/guidelines/urinalysis-by-dipstick-for-proteinuria/. [Accessed 30 August 2012]. William A. Alto 2005, The Journal of Family Practice, ‘No need for routine glycosuria/proteinuria screen in pregnant women’, November 2005 • Vol. 54, No. 11