Preview

Using Material from Item a and Elsewhere Assess the View That Crime and Deviance Are the Product of Labelling Processes.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
706 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Using Material from Item a and Elsewhere Assess the View That Crime and Deviance Are the Product of Labelling Processes.
Assess the view that crime and deviance are the products of the labelling process (21 marks)

The labelling theory is a micro interactionist approach, this is because it focuses on how individuals construct the social world through face-face interactions. It recognises the concept of the ‘procedural self’ where ones identity is continuously constructed and recognised in interaction with significant others, this results in the individual’s behaviour, including that related to crime and deviance.

Significant others are those who are in high social power and thus able to dictate influence and actively determine an individual’s life. Such individuals may include police officers, prison officers, politicians, parents and teachers. Feminists would argue however that these are all the males in society, determining and controlling the lives of females, keeping society patriarchal. The influence that significant others place on individuals lives is through the use of labels, the labels aren’t usually based on individual characteristics, more so stereotypes, working assumptions and professional knowledge. For example Cicaurel found that police patrolled working class areas more intensively, resulting in more arrests, this is due to the police’s stereotypical view that delinquent individuals are part of the working class.

Lemert distinguishes between primary and secondary deviance in society. Primary deviance involves minor offences such as vandalism or smoking underage and these acts are usually uncaught or insignificant. However an individual may be caught for such acts and inturn be labelled as delinquent or deviant, the social reaction of this label results in the development of secondary deviance: more serious crimes such as assault or drugs. This therefore illustrates that it is not the act itself but the hostile societal reaction by significant others that creates serious deviance, thus crime and deviance being products of the labelling process.
Support

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    When studying crime and deviance, in particular the causes of crime, it is often useful to look at the reasons behind why people commit crimes in the first place. For interactionists, crime and deviance is a product of labelling. They believe that when a crime is committed, it is because a public application of a negative description of a powerless individual has occurred and that is the reason why a crime has been committed by that individual. Labelling is deterministic of your future life. Interactionists reject official statistics on crime, seeing them as little more than a social construction. They maintain that they vastly underestimate the extent of crime and do not present an accurate picture of crime in society.…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Using material from item A and elsewhere, assess the view that crime and deviance are the product of using labelling processes (21 marks)…

    • 810 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay question: Assess the usefulness of the labelling theory in explaining crime and deviance. (33 marks)…

    • 916 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This question includes assessment of your understanding of the connections between crime and deviance and sociological theory.…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Using material from Item A and elsewhere, assess the usefulness of labelling theory in explaining crime and deviance. (21 marks)…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Interactionists argue that a mistake most perspectives make is that they assume lawbreakers are somehow different from law-abiding people. The labelling theory suggests that most people commit deviant and criminal acts but only come are caught and stigmatised for it. It is for this reason that emphasis should be on understanding the reaction and definition of deviance rather than the causes of the initial act.…

    • 1194 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mr Stefan Sledmore

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Pease (1994) said, ‘Crime comprises those actions which are deemed so damaging to the interest of the community that the state determines that it must take a direct role in identifying and acting against the criminal.’ Downes and Rock (1998) said ‘Deviance may be considered as banned or controlled behaviour which is likely to attract punishment or disproval.’ In short, ‘Deviance’ is a asocial construct that can change across time and place and ‘Crime’ is an action that breaks the law.…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Some say labelling is not a ‘theory’ because it does not give an explanation of law, but questions why we have such rules. For Labelling theorists there is no such thing as crime, as we create the laws and punishments by defining certain acts to be deviant. Deviant means to depart from usual or accepted standards. Leading theorist Kitsuse said “it is the responses of the conventional and conforming members of society which identify and interpret behaviour as deviant which sociology transforms persons into deviants”. This means that it is not the actions themselves that are crimes…

    • 4485 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Labelling Theory

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Labelling theory addresses a larger definition of crime, referring not only to illegal conduct or actions but much rather to deviant behaviour in general. Deviance is seen as a quality attributed to a certain act by those who witness it directly or indirectly and deem it immoral and wrong. Behaviours acquire the label of being deviant by social interaction and maintain it by social learning. This new approach is in contradiction with the former views of crime as inherent to the action or behaviour and in some cases excusable by the circumstances such as anomie or social strain, which assume homogenous norms and equal responses or punishments to all those guilty.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Howard Becker is a sociologist that is often credited with the development of the labelling theory. However the origins of this theory can be traced back to sociologists at the beginning of the twentieth century who made invaluable contributions to the creation of the “labelling” concept. The first was Charles Cooley who wrote “Human Nature and the Social Order” in 1902, in which he introduced the term the “looking glass self”. This idea suggests that an individual will respond to society based on how the individual thinks society perceives them. Another was Frank Tannenbaum (1938) who studied juvenile participation in street gangs. He argued that when society defines certain behaviour as deviant, a “tag” is then placed upon the individual that displayed the deviant behaviour, thus causing further deviant / criminal behaviour. Although Cooley and Tannenbaum influenced Becker it was the much later influence of Edwin Lamert that truly led the way. Lemert was, by many of his peers, credited with introduction of the ‘original’ version of the labelling theory. In Lemert’s 1951 publication, “Social Pathology” he states that primary deviance is the original offence that causes a figure in authority to “label” the offender as deviant. Furthermore he states that if said offender accepts the deviant “label” offered to them, this will result in further deviance, known as secondary deviance. This may then lead to a “self- fulfilling prophecy” causing the individual to live up to their deviant label.…

    • 1985 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Within criminal justice Labelling Theory has been seen as a way of manipulating and encouraging both the would be offender to think and behaviours in a particular way so as to live up to the label and equally to manipulate and direct the thoughts and actions of those that work and manage the system e.g. a label encourages them to takes on particular negative perspective or bias towards a person or group of people. This essay will focus on describing all aspects of Labelling Theory in relation to crime and the criminal justice system. It will also evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of Labelling Theory which dominated sociological theory of crime and thinking in the 1960’ and 70’s.…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crime and deviance are always been a matter of fact, the ‘collateral effect’ of living among other people. Norms and rules are set in each society, from rural ones to the largest urban environments, but this cannot prevent the attitudes by some individuals, that in the most of case gang up, to not follow these norms. They are the deviant ones and they are condemned to be considered not normal, sometimes just without choosing that. Paradoxically, most of actions and situations that are considered as normal, under a more peculiar analysis may be not so ‘normal’. For example, the norms that consider smoking as a ‘crime’ are the ones that ban this action in public places, since smoking is injurious both to yours and to the others’ health but, in…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lilly's Labeling Theory

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Thus, when discussing labeling theory, it can be assumed that society is the most responsible for the deviant behaviors of its citizens for various reasons. The first, and presumably most significant, is the fact that powerful citizens are in charge of determining which behaviors are considered criminal and which ones are not. For example, wife battering was only criminalized when individuals were motivated to create legal reform, it was not always a crime (Lilly, 2015). Society is also responsible for such behaviors because they construct the labels that lead citizens to make negative assumptions about offenders that are often times untrue (Lilley et al., 2015). As a result, these assumptions influence people’s reactions to offenders, making room for stereotyping and stigmas that produce unequal treatment for all offenders (Lilly, 2015). For example, a murder takes places in our community. While the murder itself is considered a socially deviant act, weather or not it will be viewed as a homicide depends upon the reaction of others, rather than the act itself (Lilly, 2015). If the victim was a police officer, people are going to react differently than if the victim was a…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Critical perspectives on crime differ from other perspectives in that they focus on ways people and institutions respond to crime and criminals. Critical perspectives are often called social reaction theories. The different theories covered under critical perspectives include Labeling theory, Conflict and radical theory and feminist theory. Labeling theory states that deviance is not the act itself that a person commits; a deviant label will lead us to be more deviant. Labeling theory is one of the most significant perspectives in the study of criminology. Amongst these theories is the labeling theory which is one of the most significant theories studied. Labeling theory adopts a relativist’s definition, by assuming that nothing about a…

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Using material from item A and elsewhere assess the view that crime and deviance are the product of the labelling process.…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics