Working on this case, a variety of alternative intervention theories were used to support both Child R and his mother.
Strengths-based approach
The strengths perspective acknowledges ‘problems’ but takes the focus away from issues by concentrating on factors which increase resilience to overcome difficulties. Through getting to know the qualities of each individual within the family, each person becomes valued for their personal contributions or abilities; including their skills, capabilities, values and dreams. Seen as strengths, these assets are utilised to secure empowerment as families access them to build a better life. For example, people who have a sense of humour are more likely to establish friendships and be affected by isolation (Seleebey, 1996). Learning about individual strengths, however, can be challenging as those experiencing complexities tend to solely discuss their issues. I found this to be true with child R’s mother as she consistently talked about child R’s problematic behaviour. Nevertheless through time spent with her son, I myself had been able to identify many of the mother’s strengths. I highlighted to mother that she is an attentive listener whom shows interest in hearing her son thoughts, feelings and concerns; she is a dedicated and caring …show more content…
I appeared to minimise the power-imbalance as the mother realised that I was working in her child’s best interests. Whilst, the mother and I were able to work in partnership and share ideas regarding boosting child R’s self-esteem, including suggesting activities which allow him to make friends and have fun. Furthermore, I applied ethical principles by stating that the final decision over the choice of activities must be child R’s as he was