Region varieties of English have developed different grammatical forms, for example, take the sentences “the stylus needs changed” and “the stylus needs changing”; one of these will be more familiar and natural than the other. If you live in the southeast of England, in Scotland or in North America the first form will probably be preferred however if you come from the north or the Midlands of England, or are from the southwest then the latter would be preferred and would appear to be of normal grammatical form.
A more obvious grammatical change is shown in the past of the familiar verb “go”. This verb has an irregular past-tense from “yede” or “yode” however, in the fifteenth century it acquired a new past-tense form “went” which follows the same past tense pattern as the verbs “send/sent” or “spend/spent”.
As previously stated, words in the Old English changed their form far more as what occurs within modern language. So, for example, “the king” is variously “se cyning” or “phone cyning”, depending on its grammatical role. As well as this, the order of words in Old English is sometimes rather different from the modern order. The placement of pronouns such as “me” and “it” has particularly changed, for example “she gave it me/she gave me it”.
In Old English, the language construct “passive” has existed side by side with the language construct “active”, the passive and active can be seen within these two sentences; “Edison invented the electric light” illustrates an active construct as this sentence consists of a subject-verb-object form however the sentence “the electric light was invented by Edison” demonstrates the passive as it uses the form object-verb-subject. Although these two constructs existed side by side, for many centuries the passive was limited to occurring in certain very simple types of sentences. In more complex sentences the passive could not be used; this was particularly so with the –ing form of the verb. For example, “I guessed there was some mischief contriving” demonstrates the use of the active construct within language; in modern English this would be seen as unusual grammar. The use of the passive English construct is regularly seen in newspaper articles for titles and subtitles; the passive can easily be misconstrued so journalists will use this in order to make things appear differently to what they actually are.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
English Dept. of Quinnipiac University. “Part Seven: Editing Grammar.” The College Writers Reference. 5th Ed. Upper Saddle River: New Jersey, 2008. 335-350.…
- 2937 Words
- 12 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Instead of changing forms (in English ‘I’ becomes ‘me’ and ‘him’ becomes he), word order is…
- 612 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Each generation change over the years, so the language spoken back in the 18th century is way different then the English we use now. I think because in the old generation people use to spell and write words backwards and differently from the way things are now. In the old days they didn't have all the new technology that we have today they had type writers, and other kind of things. Unlike the technology that we have today. In todays world the language that we use is more slang than back in the days.…
- 466 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The first half of eighteen century is commonly designated in histories of literature the Augustan Age in England. During the half-century preceding, the principal characteristics of this period may be seen taking form, and in the fifty years following. They are still clearly visible, however mixed with new tendencies foreign to it.…
- 1143 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The subject-matter of our study is French borrowings into the English language.The aim of this work is the comparative analysis of the borrowings in the Middle English and the Modern English periods and the peculiarities of word changes.…
- 5996 Words
- 34 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Murphy, Raymond (1994) New English Grammar in use. A self study reference and practice book for…
- 3199 Words
- 13 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Cited: 1.) Durkin, Philip. "Old English—an Overview." OED. OED, 1 Jan. 2013. Web. 3 Nov. 2014. <http://public.oed.com/aspects-of-english/english-in-time/old-english-an-overview/>.…
- 1260 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
Like an example that is mentioned by Holmes, it says that the k of knit and knife wasn 't silent in the fifteenth century. So it can be seen how important the matter of time is in language change. Another example given by Holmes is about the meaning of the words like once nice meant precise ', and before that it meant fastidious ' and earlier still it meant ignorant '.…
- 525 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
' 'Old English as it is well known, was a highly inflected language, which made it possible to show the connection between words in word groups and sentences by means of synthetic devices; analytical ways of word-connection were of lesser importance. Accordingly, the word order in the sentence and within noun patterns and verb patterns was relatively free. The Old English sentence was characterized by a variety of objects expressed by different case forms with and without prepositions; various case forms of nouns could also serve as adverbial modifiers. On the other hand, the structure of the sentence was relatively simple: thus there wvre as vet very few complex parts of the sentence (only the complex object," used on a very restricted scale and an adverbial modifier, the so-called Dative Absolute, which soon went out of use), The structure of the complex sentence in the Old English period was yet in the making, probably because the written form of language, which favors the growth of more complicated sentence patterns, had only recently come into being. These and many other features of Old English syntax will have to be recalled in considering the changes in the structure of the word groups and sentences in the Middle English and Early New English periods.…
- 5170 Words
- 21 Pages
Powerful Essays -
2. Ginzburg R.S., Khidekel S.S., Knyazeva G.Y., Sankin A.A. A Course in Modern English Lexicology – M. : Higher School Publishing House, 1979. – P. 5 – 11…
- 4999 Words
- 20 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
This research helps to discover some of the interesting findings of a survey conducted to determine how Modern English language came to us. Our main issue of this research paper is total information about modern English. What is language chronicles? What is the period of modern English language?…
- 1053 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Bibliography: 1. Algeo, J. (ed.) (2005) The Cambridge History of the English Language: English in North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.…
- 4448 Words
- 18 Pages
Best Essays -
One of the most important sound changes of the Early ME period was the loss of OE diphthongs and the growth of new diphthongs, with new qualitative and quantitative distinctions. Towards the en of the OE period some of the diphthongs merged with monophthongs. In Early ME the remaining diphthongs were also contrasted to monophthongs: the long [ea:] coalesced with the reflex of OE [ :] - ME [ :]; the short [ea] ceased to be distinguished from OE [ ] and became [a] in ME. The diphthongs [eo:, eo] – as well as their dialectal variants [io:, io] – fell together with the monophthongs [e:, e, i:, i]. Later they shared in the development of respective monophthongs.…
- 2186 Words
- 9 Pages
Good Essays -
Word-meaning is liable to change in the course of the historical development of language. Changes of lexical meaning may be illustrated by a diachronic semantic analysis of many commonly used English words. The word fond (OE. fond) used to mean ‘foolish’, ‘foolishly credulous’; glad (OE, glaed) had the meaning of ‘bright’, ’shining’ and so on.…
- 2425 Words
- 10 Pages
Powerful Essays -
An earlier version of this paper was presented as a plenary address to the annual meeting of the British Association ofApplied Linguistics, University of Southampton, September 1995. I thank all those who provided important feedback, suggestions, and criticisms on earlier versions of this article. I am especially grateful to Merrill Swain, John Schumann, Elaine Tarone, and Leo van Lier. Any shortcomings, and there are no doubt many, are my responsibility alone. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to James P. Lantolf, Department of Modern Languages, 314 Morrill Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853 USA. Internet: JPL5Qcornell.edu…
- 13072 Words
- 53 Pages
Better Essays