The question in front of the court is to determine whether the defendant acted in negligence by not adhering to a relevant background check, and hiring a convicted felon, with a history of violence. The outcome of the case will determine the need to conduct a valid reliable extensive background check, and whether or not a Business should be held accountable for the actions of employees, be that they have been hired after being convicted felons.…
Utilitarian ethical theories are based on one’s ability to expect the concerns of an deed. Utilitarianism’s creed is that the result of any action takes importance over any type of means, this means that Utilitarianisms objective is to help as many individuals as possible even if it were to negatively disturb people along the way so as long as it helped the general populace. Basically, it’s the ends that matter not necessarily the means.…
According to Merriam-Webster slippery slope is defined as a process or series of events that is hard to stop or control once it has begun and that usually leads to worse or more difficult behavior. In the law enforcement field, gratuity, which is the receipt of free meals, services, or discounts, goes hand in hand with the term slippery slope. Many think it is both unethical and immoral to except gratuities on and off the job. Gratuity by others is viewed as “A relatively innocent transaction in a work universe in which the standard form of reciprocity . . . is extortion-ate rather than hospitable.” (Delattre,…
The issue here is that employers will often discriminate, against former criminals during the hiring process. It is almost impossible to even get an interview if someone has to indicate that they have a criminal record on a job application. To make matters worse, a released criminal will be hit with a bevy of fines and payments that need to be made to the state ranging from public defender fees to expenses incurred in prison. As if living on minimum wage, without government help, and with little to no job security wasn’t hard enough, these fines make it nearly impossible for people to support…
I agree with you ethics in the criminal justice system is very important, the officer of law could affect the other people life over their decision. I think your friend was make the right decision. On the friend aspect yes she was betray her friend, but it is the right thing to do, friendship is show out the right and wrong things help each other go up not to cover up for the other. On the work aspect, she also right because tell the truth and help the other got what he/she is deserved it has.…
The long debated question of the importance of men and women and their roles has raged on for years. Should men and women be treated equally, that truly is the question that seems to have more answers than resolution. Applying the question to Deontology and the work of Immanuel Kant, the answer would be all people regardless of gender should be treated equally. However, these theories do not take into account the actions of the male or female in question. The question still remains, should men and women be treated equally or should it be based on the situation, all accounts will be taken into further consideration.…
Since the events of the Newtown School Shooting and the Boston Marathon Bombing both cities have rebuilt themselves after suffering attacks in 2012 and 2013 that shook the cities and took the lives of many. As the responsible party of any facility or public event security planning and practice plays a vital part in a city subject to future acts of selfless acts of crimes or acts of terrorism. Societal structures, such as schools, malls and churches, are key elements of American lifestyles. Public events such as concerts, marathons, or parades, host millions of people at any given time making them subjective to mass terrorist attacks. Terrorist groups focus on creating organized chaos and inflicting major damage on areas and people. Like the events of September 11th, terrorist events are not always in a particular area at a particular time. This was shown to be true with past events such as the Newton School Shootings and the Boston Marathon Shooting.…
Criminal background checks (CBC), however, are complicated because records are decentralized and maintained at the federal, state, and county levels. Your institution may need to check the records in each state and county in which a person has lived over the past five to 10 years. A 2004 survey by the Society for Human Resources Management found a substantial increase since 1996 in the number of employers performing various background checks on potential employees (Hughes et. al., 2007). The popularity of such checks is growing in part because electronic-data-collection techniques make it quicker and easier to find out information about current and prospective employees. Also, “high-dollar verdicts against organizations and institutions for negligently hiring employees have focused employers on potential liability. Criminal-background checks are becoming a common element of faculty and administrative searches” (Der Werf, 2006 pg.33). Many state, and an increasing number of private colleges, are requiring background checks prior to or as part of job…
The Utilitarianism theory supports individual capability to foresee the costs of an act. A Utilitarian considers the decision of giving the best profit to a large number of people; this is known to be ethically correct.…
I am in agreement with laws in certain states such as Alabama, where a license is required to carry a firearm. The logic of requiring individuals to attend and pass safety classes for handguns is no less important than the classes currently required to obtain a hunting license in the state of Alabama. (AL Online Hunter Safety Course) Unlike the Alabama Driver License program, I believe recertification should be required no less than every five years. I’m not opposed to citizens having the right to own weapons in their home as a right protected under the Second Amendment. But if those citizens wish to carry the protection with them into public, I am not opposed to a testing, safety, and license process. I concur that background checks will not cover all situations, since nothing is a complete fix to the problem. Background checks serve a purpose and filter specific individuals from obtaining a gun. Tracking individuals, and qualifying them to carry their weapons into public is a measure I can…
You succinctly described, through personal experience, the biases that affects many regardless of profession. “The racial profiling controversy, which began within the context of traffic stops, is encroaching into other areas like, transportation security, shoplifting, immigration and quality of life enforcement” (Withrow & Dailey, 2011). Many in society will see this as a failure in the lack of family instilled values or a leadership failure but refuse to see it as a personal accountability issue. As accountability is not addressed, people begin to accept a warped reality where stepping over the line of ethics is justified by the results it brings, such as the “honey pot” areas you discussed. This type of behavior spreads like the wildfire…
One of the most common and probably most important uses of a criminal record is access to a background check on that person. This can be extremely crucial to someone’s chances of getting a quality job whether it be a part-time or professional career. They can question you at any time about the incident(s) and can deny you from the position. Additionally, if you lie about your record in your application, it looks worse and can actually be a crime in itself. Depending on the case and amount of convictions one can still receive the job but even that might be too difficult to guarantee. Some of the main reasons an employer frowns upon hiring a convict has do with security of the company, workplace safety and enforcement of employment laws. The ability for employers to conduct background checks on somebodies criminal history is just one of many consequences to be faced.…
The principle reasons for prison overcrowding are the mandatory minimum laws passed by Congress in 1984 and the Three Strikes law passed in the state of California in 1994. Mandatory minimums were enacted in order to fight the war on drugs; however, the law has not worked in the reduction of illegal drug crimes.…
Employers can ask job applicants whether they have been convicted of a crime although federal anti-discrimination laws place some restrictions on the use of criminal histories. State law also prohibits employers, including the state and its political subdivisions, from taking certain…
Background checks are meant to serve as a way to ensure the people owning a firearm are responsible and capable of owning a weapon. Even though background checks are occurring there are still millions of irresponsible people in possession of a firearm. There needs to be tighter restrictions during the background check for people to purchase a gun. Many individuals who suffer from mental illness get their hands on guns and use the weapons for mass destruction instead of its intended purpose of…