Utilitarian Objection Raised By Srinivasan Analysis

Furthermore, Srinivasa states that we are pressurized by the Utilitarian that ourselves belong to us and should be at the service of helping others. But we don’t belong to ourselves, we cannot be a service by helping others if we don’t want that and wish for. Srinivasan mentions the statement presented by MacAskill when he says that he did not donate to the hospital in Haiti where one of his friends was there. He did not donate there because he could donate elsewhere and should not donate to somewhere or someone who has to have personal connect with. If he were to donate to that friend of his it would have been for emotional rather than moral reasons. He also says that arbitrary was the pattern he crossed by deciding who to donate to and his point is all about the morality.
Another objection raised by Srinivasan will be by worrying about the world while your loved one is in need without the help of anyone will not make us happy. As the Utilitarian want everyone to think like them and care for others and their happiness. We are normal people who cannot be forced to anything that we don’t want. For instance, If the utilitarian suggest we donate to Donald Trump’s funds because that money goes to affected areas. And If I was an immigrant from the middle east or South Africa, I would not donate to Trump’s funds for many reasons. One, he only cares about the American people then why should my money goes to them when I can give it to charities back in my country in the middle east or Africa. Two, with the donation the funds can become so stronger that can create more racism and kick me out from the US. We have our own personal identity and loyalties. People will always be loyal to the people that are always there for