Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Utilitarianism: Pros and Cons

Good Essays
674 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Utilitarianism: Pros and Cons
Antoine James
September 29, 2010
Justice & Legal Theory

Utilitarianism: Pros and Cons

Random House Dictionary defines utilitarianism as “the ethical doctrine that virtue is based on utility, and that conduct should be directed toward promoting the greatest happiness of the greatest number of persons. The father of utilitarianism, Jeremy Bentham believed that all human beings are motivated by minimizing pain and maximizing pleasure; therefore morality and justice should be determined on those same grounds. Utilitarianism teaches that maximizing pleasure, and minimizing pain can answer any moral question. This way of looking at justice has its high points where it works well, and its nadirs where the theory falls apart. I’ll explore both sides below. On the surface, the basic theory behind utilitarianism seems very attractive. If all decisions are based on doing the greatest amount of good for the most people- isn’t that justice? Even Captain Kirk on Star Trek told Mr. Spock that the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few. Most of the time this is correct. Environmental laws may lower the profits of an oil refinery, but the greater good is the clean air that the citizens that live around the refinery get to enjoy and the lower amount of pollution in the air for the general public. There are many examples of policy decisions, laws, and moral decisions that follow the same principle; doing the greatest amount of good for the most people. In many situations this philosophy is appropriate and effective in promoting justice. However, there are also situations where the utilitarian point of view is not the best way to settle a moral question.

The major downside to utilitarianism is its lack of respect for individual rights. Sandel’s Throwing Christians to the Lions example sums up the individual rights criticism; while throwing a “small” number of Christians to be eaten by lions for the happiness of the crowd (and arguably could be extended outwardly) may be maximizing utility, it ignores the major moral question regarding “should we be killing in this fashion?” That leads to the next major criticism of utilitarianism- the theory doesn’t prioritize pleasures and pains, therefore it doesn’t prioritize moral questions. The Dudley and Stephens cannibalism case shows some moral decisions are more complicated than simply doing the greatest good for the most people. It is hard to argue that killing and eating the sickly minor on board so they could live was the morally “right” thing to do.

John Stuart Mill tried to address the two main criticisms of utilitarianism in his theories. Mill’s central principle is that people should be free to do anything that does not harm anyone else. Mill was a strong believer in individual rights, and tried to reconcile his views with utilitarianism. Under Mill’s view, utility must be used in the, “larger sense, grounded on the permanent interests of man as a progressive being.” His argument is that if we use utility to judge actions in the long run, and not on a case-by-case basis, he avoids some of the criticisms of utilitarianism regarding individual rights. While Mill injects his strong views on individual rights into his theories of utilitarianism, it still may fall short in certain situations. If the majority is great enough, the utility balance may reach the point where the happiness created by restricting minority views outweighs the freedom of the minority. I believe minority rights are still threatened by using utility to judge conduct or actions.

The utilitarian method of balancing pleasure and pain, and maximizing pleasure for the most people is a theory that makes sense and promotes justice. Basic public policy decisions and policies benefit from this way of thinking; in my opinion utilitarianism is most appropriate in this community sense. It is less appropriate when it is being applied to moral decisions between individuals and how people behave toward each other. In these cases I believe other theories of solving moral questions should be explored to promote justice.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Correct! Utilitarianism is based on the principle of maximizing happiness (or any other measure of utility) for the greatest number of people, as well as minimizing unhappiness for the greatest number. The means of achieving this outcome is not as much of an issue as the actual outcome for the utilitarian.…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    I will first explicate on the theory of utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is a philosophical theory which states that that which is right is what brings the greatest amount of happiness to the greatest maximum number of people. The act that manages to fulfill this criteria is the act that is then morally right. As a result, whenever we consider what is a morally right action to do, we have to keep in mind that the action that would make it so that the accumulated level of happiness in the majority would be higher than the accumulated number of unhappiness in a majority. As well, utilitarianism is bias-free, in that the happiness levels of your close friends and family do not take priority over the happiness levels of the neighbors next door, or of people in countries that you have never visited and will never…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism is a theory in normative ethics holding that the proper course of action is the one that maximizes overall happiness. Utilitarianism can be characterized as a quantitative and reductionist approach to ethics. It can be contrasted with deontological ethics which does not regard the consequences of an act as a determinant of its moral worth.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism revolves around the concept of “the end justifies the means.” It believes that outcomes as a result of an action have a greater value compared to the latter, the morally right action is the action that produces the most good. It also states that the most ethical thing to do is to take advantage of happiness for the good of the society. This normative theory considers the overall good for all people and not just a single person.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Louis P. Pojman, “Strengths and Weaknesses of Utilitarianism” in Steven M.Cahn “Exploring Ethics –An Introductory Anthology” (Oxford University Press, 2011 , ISBN:978-0-19-975751-0) pp.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A tragic hero is defined as “a [great] man who is neither a paragon of virtue and justice nor undergoes the change to misfortune through any real badness or wickedness but because of some mistake” (“Aristotle”, n.d.). Therefore, a tragic hero has some sort of tragedy that surrounds their life. A tragic hero also makes dramas more interesting and makes readers think. Dramas sometimes either exemplify or refute Aristotle’s definition of a tragic hero. Oedipus by Sophocles exemplifies Aristotle’s definition in four different aspects. The first aspect involves both Oedipus’ ignorance and knowledge of his life situations, the second involves his hamartia, the third involves the actual plot itself, and the fourth involves the characterization of…

    • 1506 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism claims that everyone shares a common intrinsic value of happiness and that because this is seen as the most important value in life, we should try to maximize…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It was the first day of 6th grade for Michael Brown in the United States. Michael came from a Military family who spent the last 12 years living in France and had never been anywhere outside the Country or to a public school before.As Michael sat in the driver seat of his mothers car, eating what was left of his breakfast, he could taste the bitter taste that lay upon his tongue from his gut wrenching stomach.He felt scared, nervous and unprepared.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism is a teleological theory which looks at the consequences of an act to decide whether it is right or wrong. There are lots of strengths to utilitarianism and not many weaknesses. One of the strengths is that it is a theory which established whether something was good or bad according to the majority of people. Bentham came up with this theory and it is known as the principle of utility. Bentham said ‘Nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure. It is for them to point out what we shall do’. This is the foundation for the principle of utility and it is a strength to utilitarianism as pleasure and pain can determine how people act. Bentham also said the aim of utilitarianism is ‘the greatest good of the greatest number’ and he used the Hedonic Calculus that he created to measure how good an act is and how many people it will affect, this is a major strength of utilitarianism because it tries to please everyone and each individual is equal. A weakness of Bentham’s view was noticed by Mill, Mill said it failed to differentiate humans from animals as animals can share the same pleasures that humans have, so this make human beings equal to animals. Mill also said that Bentham’s Hedonic Calculus was a weakness as it was too impractical as to use it you have to think of the; purity, intensity, certainty, extent, duration and fecundity of an act. In some situations this would be pointless as there might not be time to complete the Hedonic Calculus. For example is your house was on fire and you only had time to save either you cat or your dog you would not be able to think through the Hedonic Calculus as by the time you have your house would be burnt to the ground. This is a weakness to Bentham’s theory but not to utilitarianism because you can still please the majority without looking at the Hedonic Calculus every time you want to complete an act.Bernard…

    • 517 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism is amongst the most famous moral theories to argue social issues. Developed by Jeremy Bentham, Utilitarianism is a belief that welfare and happiness should be maximized. Bentham believed that the morality of an action was determined by how much overall utility resulted from that action. Following were philosophers like include John Stuart Mill and John Rawls who mentioned that utilitarianism was a moral theory that could be used to justify inequality. Utilitarianism however is perhaps the most efficient theory to approach normative ethics. This consequential theory is understood to hold that the right action will always produce the greatest good. It is not concerned with the means to achieve the greatest good but how much good is produced. So, to refer back to Rawls’ comment, utilitarianism is a theory most commonly effective to argue against inequality since both Bentham and Mill will agree that, the action that produces ‘the greatest good for the greatest number’ will always be the right action. Because utilitarianism in all emphasizes social welfare, it is best to acknowledge that the rising income inequality in the United States is unethical.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarian’s would be against abortion if it were damaging society. If there were a low in the amount of babies being born because of abortions it would damage society as a whole because we need people to sustain society. Or if we found that unborn babies sensed the pain of an abortion it would be against utilitarian view because the group of babies was feeling pain. Also an abortion could bring about the death of a great person that affects humanity. What if Einstein was aborted or what if bill gates was aborted? Humanity would be significantly different without those individuals and with that society, as a whole would be affected negatively by abortion.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ultilitarianism

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages

    But this brings up an issue: most of morality is considered partial. It makes sense to care more about your children, family, and friends than complete strangers, but utilitarianism rejects this. If giving money, time, etc. to total strangers while “sacrificing the important needs of friends and family” results in the least amount harm than you are morally obligated to do so. We need to count everyone’s well being and interests equally. But this could lead to disastrous results. What if a majority of society benefits from an atrocity such as slavery? Utilitarianism would require us to allow it even if everyone’s interests were equally, since there would be a large amount of ‘benefit.’…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Perhaps rationally, many are skeptical that voting is a worthwhile practice. This is why, especially in the months leading up to an election, we are encouraged to vote by signs and posters, social media campaigns, our peers, and our government. Some maintain that voting is a ‘civic duty’ and a meaningful exercise in self-expression. Others contend that we should vote in pursuit of a democratic ideal, and still others argue that we should vote out of respect for those who have defended our rights.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Occupy Wall Street

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Utilitarian is the moral doctrine that we should always act to produce the greatest possible balance of good over bad for everyone affected by our actions. The greatest happiness of all constitutes the standard that determines whether an action is right or wrong. Our belief that we are individuals and society is the net result of our choices. For example, the practice of blowing up rocks to release underground natural gas would not be permitted near residential areas if energy complaints…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Greatest Happiness principle in general is good, but it has many flaws as any ethical systems does. Due to our inability to perfectly predict the future according to our actions (assuming he future is capable of being altered with our actions), the results we desire are capable of, and often do, fall short of what was intended. If unforeseen parameters caused all of our actions to backfire, even though we were attempting to act in accordance with Utilitarianism, we would all be considered immoral as our results only caused pain. If this happened to everyone in the entire world, then no man could be considered moral. The Greatest Happiness principle also allows for us to cause pain to others as long as a majority of the people become…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays