Utilitarianism Vs Deontology Essay

Utilitarianism and deontology are two moral theories that can often pull us in different direction. Utilitarianism is the ethical doctrine that virtue is based on utility, and that conduct should be directed toward promoting the greatest happiness of the greatest number of persons. This can be viewed as a contingent right. Contingent means something that could happen or come up depending on other occurrences. An example of a contingent right is the unexpected need for a bandage on a hike. The bandage is what the hiker needs and it will bring happiness to the person. Deontology is an ethical theory that the morality of an action should be based on whether that action itself is right or wrong under a series of rules, rather than based on the consequences of the action. This can be viewed as a fundamental right. These are rights that humans have by the fact of being
A utilitarian approach to deception would consider whether telling a lie creates greater happiness than telling the truth or keeping silent. If it does, then it is morally right. If it doesn’t, then it is morally wrong. A deontological example to deception is Kant rules out making a false promise as immoral because it involves a contradiction in conception. The same applies to lying in general. If you lie, you are following the maxim to tell a lie when you want to. If everyone told lies when they wanted to, people would stop believing each other. But you can deceive someone with a lie only if they believe you. So the maxim cannot be universalized, and lying is wrong. In the occidental case, an example of deception would be how Deborah implicitly acknowledges Wayne's claim that it would be wrong for him to lie about test results by formulating for him a statement he can assent to. They both come to different conclusions about what should be done and both are acting out of good