Preview

utilitarion vs kantianism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1099 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
utilitarion vs kantianism
PHIL.RLST 2345 EL 10 Bioethics: Human Life Issues

Assignment #1
Amanda Secord
Ethical Theories and Ethical Tools

Utilitarianism versus Kantianism in case study #1: An accident on Makalu The main rule of utilitarianism is to perform the one action that will provide the greatest amount of pleasure and the least amount of pain to the greatest number of people. In our case study, one would think the choice is quite easy, if we let go of Gary, we are providing no happiness for anyone and a great deal of pain to his family and friends and to ourselves. However, the one person that will get pleasure from this scenario is perhaps Gary, who is suffering. According to the utilitarian theory, the right action to perform would be to do everything in our power to save Gary, because if we save him there would be a lot more people that will be happy then if we were to let him die. There is only one person who would get pleasure from letting Gary go, and that is Gary himself. One could argue that the person watching Gary suffer will provide that person with a great amount of pain, but if we were to let Gary go, as painful as it may be to watch our friend die and be the one responsible, we may find ourselves happy that he did not suffer. The Greatest Happiness Principle suggest that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to promote the reverse of happiness. In our case study, saving Gary would promote happiness to ourselves and friends and family of Gary, letting Gary succumb to his injuries and letting go will promote the reverse of happiness to ourselves and friends and family of Gary. According to Mill, pleasures are qualitatively different, depending on their origin, meaning some pleasures should be counted more heavily. Does the pleasure we will receive in saving Gary and watching him live outweigh the pleasure Gary might receive by not suffering and dying a quick death. According to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The essential part of utilitarianism, whether it is Act or Rule, is to promote the greatest overall utility for the given situation. If we look in terms of Utilitarianism, one would be in favor of killing Tom to save the other four children. Even though, Tom would be killed, he would promote overall utility by saving four people through his one body. This reminds me a lot of the Trolley problem we studied in Unit five. They killed one man to save multiple. This may be considered immoral in a way, but according to Act Utilitarianism, the correct choice and the one that promotes overall utility would be to kill Tom and use his body to save the four siblings. In an Act Utilitarian’s mind, they would first think “In what way could I promote the greatest utility for every single person in the situation?” They must then think about the situation. The mother and father could either lose Tom, or they could lose their other four children. The Doctor could either kill Tom and save the four children or let Tom live and watch the others die…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pt2520 Unit 1 Assignment

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Beauchamp T, Childress J. 2001. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 5th edition Oxford University Press ISBN 0-19-514332-9…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this paper, we discussed the ethical implications of New York’s ban on smoking in public places. We looked at two considerations with this policy, Utilitarianism - greatest overall amount of good or happiness and deontology - rightness or wrongness of the actions themselves, not the consequences of those actions. We discussed several issues involved with Initiative…

    • 1790 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Now, the question of whether or not he made the right decision would depend on which theory you consulted. In terms of utilitarianism, there is no immediate right answer. The argument could even be made that an act utilitarian and a rule utilitarian would give the man different advice. So an act utilitarian is one that evaluates an action based on its individual effects; that is to say, they would perform an action if that specific circumstance would lead to more aggregate pleasure than pain. So in this situation, you would be required to try and quantify the aggregate pleasure and pain of the decision. On one hand, there would be potential for plenty of pleasure to be gained. If the man releases his knowledge, it could lead to health regulations and reforms, potentially saving thousands of lives and helping to avoid thousands more cases of cancer. However, there is also the chance that he would follow through, but his word would not have much of a social or political impact, and there would be very little aggregate pleasure. The same seems to hold true for the pain aspect. Potentially, the man’s…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Results Lens, the effect of the stakeholders is that for the shareholders will be medium impact. Carol Tempest impact will be low because the issue has not yet been exposed and she has not taken any action. The impact for Anastacio is high because harassment is bad business for everyone once the issue becomes exposed. The impact for Gayle Dornier will be high because she is the alleged victim of harassment. Bill Witherspoon impact is medium because harassment has yet to be proven and for John…

    • 1135 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The creed which accepts as the foundation of morals, Utility, or the Greatest Happiness Principle, holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness” (11). That quote is from “Utilitarianism” written by John Stuart Mill. Mill is noted in history as a man who pushed for radical change of social and legal principles using Utilitarianism as his guide. That quote sums up his belief in that theory. In this essay I will be discussing Mill, the theory of Utilitarianism and how that theory relates to contemporary ethical issues.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    One would consider when making a decision about euthanasia for an ill family member that according to Mill The utilitarian doctrine is, that happiness is desirable, and the only thing desirable, as an end; all other things being only desirable as means to that end. My interpretation is that in other words, we are to treat others and ourselves as a means to an end, and it would be immoral to use people and ourselves as a mere means. Happiness is something that can be experienced so far as we understand when we are alive. Mill also states that “… there is in reality nothing desired except happiness. Whatever is desired otherwise than as a means to some end beyond itself, and ultimately to happiness, is desired as itself a part of happiness, and is not desired for itself until it has become so.”Utilitarianism seeks to find an answer to why people behave the way that they do, and according to Mill our actions derive from the pursuit of happiness. I would argue that according to utilitarianism that one does not commit suicide in order to seek happiness as an…

    • 1769 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    phil 111 exam

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1. Utilitarianism is moral theory that tries to lay a set of rules that you should follow to achieve the most good or pleasure from any one act. Two popular proponents of this systems are philosophers by the name of Jeremy Bentham and James Mill. They both have different ideas for how one should go about the use of utilitarianism to achieve the greatest happiness. Bentham's approach is often called quantitative utilitarianism in which Bentham came up with an idea called the felicific calculus which is a way one can measure the level of happiness that can come out of one certain decision. For Bentham pleasure is countable and tangible, by this I mean that pleasure can be used as sort of a measuring system for what should be morally right or wrong. Now on the other hand James Mill takes a different view of utilitarianism in which he allows for so called greater pleasure. Meaning that even though the decision that the felicific calculus tells you to make may not be the most pleasurable because some decisions have the potential to grow overtime into a more rewarding pleasure. This is where Mills is commonly referred to as a qualitative utilitarianism because he differentiates between the qualities of the pleasures you can choose. This greater pleasure idea, though, also raises a few questions in such that is it really that the decision is a so called greater pleasure or is it that you choose such decision because of the opportunity to create more pleasure. It seems as though pleasure is still the end result when you make this decision it is just that you have the opportunity to fail or be successful in this decisions which is not really consistent with the idea of pleasure but more so of opportunity.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ross, W.D., (2002). The Right and the Good. Edited, with an Introduction, by Philip Stratton-…

    • 1598 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This theory is a consequentialist based ethical theory which states you must choose the action that increases the total utility. John Stuart Mill was a key proponent of Utilitarianism. Utility is defined as the total happiness or pleasure, minus the total unhappiness or pain involved in the action. Another name for utility is the Greatest Happiness principle. From the definition of utility, pleasure and the absence of pain are the only things desirable as ends in themselves and are the only things that are good.…

    • 1730 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Stuart Mill

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages

    From my viewpoint, I would say that Mill would tell the doctor to go forth with the family’s wishes because of his statement “is it not moral for people to pursue what makes them personally happy” (Sparknotes Editors) and in this case – it would not be moral to do as the patient wishes because the end result would be that it would only make the patient happy. However, from a utilitarian view point, a physician assisted suicide can appear to be morally justified in all cases. But in this case, it would be only morally justified in the patients’ case because he is the only one who is on board with the idea of physician assisted suicide. The only way this way this would be morally justified in all cases is if not only the patient was on board, but the entire family would have to be as well, by looking at such things like the physician assisted suicide as an elimination of the financial burden due to medical costs.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Ethics

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Two forms of utilitarianism are act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism. Act utilitarianism focuses on the consequences of individual actions and how those involved will be affected. The right course of action to take is the action that will produce the most overall happiness. An example of act utilitarianism would be whether or not to tell a patient they have a serious, life-threatening illness. Telling them would cause much unhappiness; therefore lying would be the right decision. While act utilitarianism concentrates on individual actions to maximize happiness, rule utilitarianism states that moral codes should be used. A set of moral codes would better distinguish what is right and what is wrong. The moral rules are used to produce overall happiness for society. This form of utilitarianism explains that we should utilize the optimal moral code to maximize happiness. The same example above can be applied to rule utilitarianism. The doctor would need to consider moral rules. As a doctor, what is morally right? In this case, telling the truth would be the right decision.…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Defining the Moral Status

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Bibliography: Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2013). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nathanson, P., 2000, Betraying Trust or Providing Good Care? When is it okay to break…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Barney says no (Case study)

    • 2764 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Babor, Eddie. Bioethics a Philosophical Journey and a Critical Analysis into the Life Sciences: A guide to…

    • 2764 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics