Validating the Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal
Validating the Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal Author(s): Karma El Hassan and Ghida Madhum Reviewed work(s): Source: Higher Education, Vol. 54, No. 3 (Sep., 2007), pp. 361-383 Published by: Springer Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/29735117 . Accessed: 26/02/2012 04:22
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Springer is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Higher Education.
http://www.jstor.org
Higher Education (2007) 54:361-383 DOI 10.1007/sl0734-006-9002-z
?
Springer
2006
Validating KARMA
Office Bliss
theWatson EL HASSAN
Research 11-0236,
Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal & GHIDA MADHUM
& Assessment Beirut 1107 2020, (OIR?), Lebanon American University of Beirut,
of Institutional Box st., P.O.
Abstract.
(WGCTA) evidence structure different
This
study validated of 273
the Watson university Glaser students Critical in Lebanon.
Thinking
For
Appraisal
on a sample for construct and levels, subscale and
private was validation total streams correlations, a using was
that purpose,
investigated in addition series also
the test's factor through identifying to differences in scores by gender, tests. Evidence of ANOVA for the test's Moreover, students in five courses
and reliability that emphasize
concurrent critical
validity
collected.
factor revealed analysis in scores on differences different revealed results were with levels except
were tested the WGCTA. pre-post using
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Springer is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Higher Education.
http://www.jstor.org
Higher Education (2007) 54:361-383 DOI 10.1007/sl0734-006-9002-z
?
Springer
2006
Validating KARMA
Office Bliss
theWatson EL HASSAN
Research 11-0236,
Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal & GHIDA MADHUM
& Assessment Beirut 1107 2020, (OIR?), Lebanon American University of Beirut,
of Institutional Box st., P.O.
Abstract.
(WGCTA) evidence structure different
This
study validated of 273
the Watson university Glaser students Critical in Lebanon.
Thinking
For
Appraisal
on a sample for construct and levels, subscale and
private was validation total streams correlations, a using was
that purpose,
investigated in addition series also
the test's factor through identifying to differences in scores by gender, tests. Evidence of ANOVA for the test's Moreover, students in five courses
and reliability that emphasize
concurrent critical
validity
collected.
factor revealed analysis in scores on differences different revealed results were with levels except
were tested the WGCTA. pre-post using